Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of the inclusive charged-current cross section for neutrino and antineutrino scattering on isoscalar nucleons

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields

Abstract

This paper reports on measurements of the total cross section for the inclusive reaction vμ+N , as a function of incident energy. Neutrinos and antineutrinos with energy in the range 30–300 GeV were produced in the 1982 Fermilab narrow-band neutrino beamline. A total of 35 000 neutrino and 7000 antineutrino interactions were recorded in the CCFR detector located in LabE. The incident neutrino flux was determined by methods similar to those used in previous experiments. The rate of increase with energy of the total cross section (σ/E v) in the range 30 to 75 GeV was determined to be 0.659±0.005(stat)±0.039(syst)×10−38 cm2/GeV and 0.307±0.008(stat)±0.020(syst)×10−38 cm2/GeV for incident neutrinos and antineutrinos, respectively. The 5.9% systematic errors are due primarily to uncertainties in the flux intensity measurement. The energy dependence of the cross section in the regionE ν=100–300 GeV was found to be linear, as determined by relative normalization techniques. A weighted average of our previous and present measurement for the total ν-N cross section yields:

$$\begin{gathered} \sigma (vN) = 0.666 \pm 0.020(statistical \hfill \\ + systematic)E_v 10^{ - 38} cm^2 ; \hfill \\ \sigma (\bar vN) = 0.324 \pm 0.014(statistical \hfill \\ + systematic)E_v 10^{ - 38} cm^2 ; \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$

.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.C. Barish et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1977) 1415;

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.C. Bosetti et al.: Phys. Lett. 39 (1977) 1595

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. E. Asratian et al.: Phys. Lett. 70B (1977) 273;

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.G.H. de Groot et al.: Z. Phys. C Particles and Fields 1 (1979) 143;

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Jonker et al.: Phys. Lett. 99B (1981) 265; Erratum 100B (1981) 520;

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Lee: Ph. D. thesis, Caltech (1981);

  7. T. Kitagaki et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 (1982) 98; Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 955;

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.C. Bosetti et al.: Phys. Lett. 110 (1982) 167;

    Google Scholar 

  9. G.N. Taylor et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 739;

    Google Scholar 

  10. N.J. Baker et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 735;

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Balair et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 5; I. P. Berge et al.: Z. Phys. C — Particles and Fields 35 (1987) 443;

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.S. Auchincloss: Ph. D. thesis, Columbia University (1987)

  13. I. Stockdale et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 1384; I. Stockdale et al.: Z. Phys. C — Particles and Fields 27 (1985) 53

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. MacFarlane et al.: Z. Phys. C — Particles and Fields 26 (1984) 1

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Blair et al.: Nucl. Instrum. Methods 226 (1984) 281

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Bodek et al.: Z. Phys. C — Particles and Fields 18 (1983) 289

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Malensek et al.: Fermilab FN-341 (1981)

  18. D.C. Carey: SLAC-0246 (1982); FN-247, Fermi National Laboratory (1972)

  19. A. Buras, K. Gaemers: Nucl. Phys. B132 (1987) 249

    Google Scholar 

  20. The estimate of the quasielastic cross section was made by integrating the expression for the differential cross section with respect toQ 2, this expression being stated in several articles, for example, T. Kitagaki et al.: Phys. Rev. D28 (1983) 436

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Alasia et al.: Nucl. Phys. B239 (1984) 301

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. de Rujula et al.: Nucl. Phys. B154 (1979) 394

    Google Scholar 

  23. P.S. Auchincloss et al.: Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, Sendai, p. 351, T., Kitagaki, H. Yuta (ed.) (1986)

  24. S.R. Mishra et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989) 132

    Google Scholar 

  25. H.E. Fisk, F. Sciulli: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 32 (1982) 499

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Altarelli, G. Martinelli: Phys. Lett. 76B (1978) 89

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Rein, L.M. Sehgal: Ann. Phys. 133 (1981) 79; Nucl. Phys. B223 (1983) 29; D. Rein: Z. Phys. C35 (1987) 43; R. Belusevic, D. Rein: Phys. Rev. D38 (1988) 2753

    Google Scholar 

  28. Events withE had<0 result from the detector resolution at small values ofE had. Hadronic energy is obtained by summing counter pulse heights. This summation entails a small subtraction of the muon contribution to the shower region. The subtraction, however, dominates the resolution at smallE had, occasionally smearing events to negative values. The resolution function for zeroE had processes was extracted from straight through muons originating in the earth shield upstream of the detector. This resolution function, subsequently, was used to investigate the excess events in the low-y region. For details see, W.K. Sakumoto et al.: Calibration of CCFR target calorimeter, UR-1142, 1990; submitted to Nucl. Instrum. Methods

  29. E. Bloom, F. Gilman: Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 (1970) 1140

    Google Scholar 

  30. E. Oltman et al.: Nucleon structure functions from high energy neutrino-nucleon interactions. Invited talk presented at DPF'88, Storrs, Conn., 1988, Nevis-R-1417. To be submitted to Z. Phys. C—Particles and Fields

  31. S.R. Mishra, F.J. Sciulli: Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci 39 (1989) 259

    Google Scholar 

  32. P.Z. Quintas et al.: in preparation

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Auchincloss, P.S., Blair, R., Haber, C. et al. Measurement of the inclusive charged-current cross section for neutrino and antineutrino scattering on isoscalar nucleons. Z. Phys. C - Particles and Fields 48, 411–431 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01572022

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01572022

Keywords

Navigation