Skip to main content
Log in

Limitations to CO2-induced growth enhancement in pot studies

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, it has been suggested that small pots may reduce or eliminate plant responses to enriched CO2 atmospheres due to root restriction. While smaller pot volumes provide less physical space available for root growth, they also provide less nutrients. Reduced nutrient availability alone may reduce growth enhancement under elevated CO2. To investigate the relative importance of limited physical rooting space separate from and in conjunction with soil nutrients, we grew plants at ambient and double-ambient CO2 levels in growth containers of varied volume, shape, nutrient concentration, and total nutrient content. Two species (Abutilon theophrasti, a C3 dicot with a deep tap root andSetaria faberii, a C4 monocot with a shallow diffuse root system) were selected for their contrasting physiology and root architecture. Shoot demography was determined weekly and biomass was determined after eight and ten weeks of growth. Increasing total nutrients, either by increasing nutrient concentration or by increasing pot size, increased plant growth. Further, increasing pot size while maintaining equal total nutrients per pot resulted in increased total biomass for both species. CO2-induced growth and reproductive yield enhancements were greatest in pots with high nutrient concentrations, regardless of total nutrient content or pot size, and were also mediated by the shape of the pot. CO2-induced growth and reproductive yield enhancements were unaffected by pot size (growth) or were greater in small pots (reproductive yield), regardless of total nutrient content, contrary to predictions based on earlier studies. These results suggest that several aspects of growth conditions within pots may influence the CO2 responses of plants; pot size, pot shape, the concentration and total amount of nutrient additions to pots may lead to over-or underestimates of the CO2 responses of real-world plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arp WJ (1991) Effects of source-sink relations on photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ 14:869–875

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arp WJ, Drake BG (1991) Increased photosynthetic capacity ofScirpus olneyi after 4 years of exposure to elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ 14:1003–1006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barber SA (1984) Soil nutrient bioavailability: a mechanistic approach. Wiley, New York, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA (1990) Response of natural ecosystems to the rising CO2 levels. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 21:167–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz FA, Fajer ED (1992) Plant life in a CO2-rich world. Sci Amer 266:68–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boden TA, Sepanski RJ, Stoss FW (1992) Trends '91: A Compendium of Data on Global Change-Highlights. ORNL/CDIAC-049. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmi A, Hesketh JD, Enos WT, Peters DB (1983) Interrelationships between shoot growth and photosynthesis, as affected by root growth restriction. Photosynthetica 17:240–245

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cure JD, Acock B (1986) Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey. Agric For Met 38:127–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake BG, Leadley PW (1991) Canopy photosynthesis of crops and native plant communities exposed to long-term elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ 14:853–860

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajer ED, Bowers MD, Bazzaz FA (1992) The effect of nutrients and enriched CO2 environments on production of carbon-based allelochemicals inPlantago: a test of the carbon/nutrient balance hypothesis. Am Nat 140:707–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grulke NE, Riechers GH, Oechel WC, Hjelm U, Jaeger C (1990) Carbon balance in tussock tundra under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2. Oecologia 83:485–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch J, Chester ST (1986) Analysis of repeated measures experiments. Ecology 67:251–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert DW, Prudhomme TI, Oechel WC (1987) Response of tussock tundra to elevated carbon dioxide regimes: analysis of ecosystem CO2 flux through nonlinear modelling. Oecologia 72:466–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan KP, Smith AP, Ziska LH (1991) Potential effects of elevated CO2 and changes in temperature on tropical plants. Plant Cell Environ 14:763–778

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt R, Hand DW, Hannah MA, Neal AM (1991) Response to CO2 enrichment in 27 herbaceous species. Funct Ecol 5:410–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB (1984) The case for carbon dioxide. J Env Sci 27:19–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB (1986) Industrial age leading to the greening of the Earth? Nature 320:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB (1991) Comment on “Modelling the seasonal contribution of a CO2 fertilization effect of the terrestrial vegetation to the amplitude increase in atmospheric CO2 at Mauna Loa Observatory” by G.H. Kohlmaier et al. Tellus 43B:338–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB, Kimball BA (1991) Downward regulation of photosynthesis and growth at high CO2 levels. No evidence for either phenomenon in three-year study of sour orange trees. Plant Physiol 96:990–992

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis PG (1989) Atmospheric carbon dioxide and forests. Philos Trans R Soc London B324:369–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyner SP (ed) (1985) SAS/STAT guide for personal computers. Version 6 edition. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball BA (1986) CO2 stimulation of growth and yield under environmental constraints. In: Enoch HZ, Kimball BA (eds) Carbon dioxide enrichment of greenhouse crops. (Volume II; Physiology, yield and economics) CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, pp 53–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer PJ (1981) Carbon dioxide concentration, photosynthesis, and dry matter production. BioScience 31:29–33

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krizek DT, Carmi A, Mirecki RM, Snyder FW, Bunce JA (1985) Comparative effects of soil moisture stress and restricted root zone volume on morphogenetic and physiological responses of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr]. J Exp Bot 36:25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawlor DW, Mitchell RAC (1991) The effects of increasing CO2 on crop photosynthesis and productivity: a review of field studies. Plant Cell Environ 14:807–818

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnaughay KDM, Bazzaz FA (1991) Physical space as a soil resource. Ecology 72:94–103

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnaughay KDM, Bazzaz FA (1992) The occupation and fragmentation of space: consequences of neighbouring roots. Funct Ecol 6:704–710

    Google Scholar 

  • Norby RJ, Gunderson CA, Wullschleger SD, O'Neill EG, McCracken MK (1992) Productivity and compensatory responses of yellow-poplar trees in elevated CO2. Nature 357:322–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parish JAD, Bazzaz FA (1976) Underground niche separation in successional plants. Ecology 57: 1281–1288

    Google Scholar 

  • Reekie EG, Bazzaz FA (1991) Phenology and growth in four annual species grown in ambient and elevated CO2. Can J Bot 69:2475–2481

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins NS, Pharr DM (1988) Effect of restricted root growth on carbohydrate metabolism and whole plant growth ofCucumis sativus L. Plant Physiol 87:409–413

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sionit N, Patterson DT (1984) Responses of C4 grasses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. I. Effect of irradiance. Oecologia 65:30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, second edition. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stitt M (1991) Rising CO2 levels and their potential significance for carbon flow in photosynthetic cells. Plant Cell Environ 14:741–762

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strain BR, Bazzaz FA (1983) Terrestrial plant communities. In: Lemmon ER (ed) CO2 and Plants: The Response of Plants to Rising Levels of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Westview, Boulder, Colorado, USA, pp 177–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas RB, Strain BR (1991) Root restriction as a factor in photosynthetic acclimation of cotton seedlings grown in elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Physiol 96:627–634

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Velleman PF (ed) (1989) Data Desk® Statistics Guide, Volume II. Data Description, Inc., Northbrook, Illinois, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Warncke DD (1990) Testing artificial growth media and interpreting the results. In: Westerman RL (ed) Soil testing and plant analysis, 3rd edition. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp 337–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland NK, Bazzaz FA (1975) Physiological ecology of three codominant successional annuals. Ecology 56:681–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward FI, Thompson GB, McKee IF (1991) The effects of elevated concentrations of carbon dioxide on individual plants, populations, communities and ecosystems. Ann Bot 67 [Suppl] 1: 23–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong SC (1979) Elevated atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 and plant growth. I. Interactions of nitrogen and photosynthetic capacity in C3 and C4 plants. Oecologia 44:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McConnaughay, K.D.M., Berntson, G.M. & Bazzaz, F.A. Limitations to CO2-induced growth enhancement in pot studies. Oecologia 94, 550–557 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00566971

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00566971

Key words

Navigation