Skip to main content
Log in

Ecology and behavior of the desert burrowing cockroach,Arenivaga sp. (Dictyoptera, Polyphagidae)

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Measurements were made of environmental conditions in the microhabitat ofArenivaga sp., and results were correlated with their diurnal migratory behavior. The animals live in sand dunes with less than 1% moisture most of the year. During the day in spring, summer and fall they borrow in the sand at a depth of 20–60 cm, while at night, when surface temperatures have cooled, they borrow within 1–3 cm of the surface. In winter they are rarely found near the surface, remaining active at lower levels during both night and day. Adult males were collected on the surface or at a depth of 20–60 cm, but they were never observed burrowing near the surface at 1–3 cm.

The larvae and adult females are photonegative and remain at lower levels during the day, even though daytime temperature and humidity are sometimes favorable near the surface. In the summer, they migrate to the surface about 2 h later after darkness than in spring and fall. Temperature measurements indicated this was probably due to delayed nighttime cooling of the surface in the summer months. By burrowing near the surface the animals can experience cooler nighttime temperatures and water-loss may be reduced during the summer. This behavior may also facilitate disperasal and mating.

The cockroaches feed on decaying leaves and the roots of desert shrubs. Since the latter have 35–38% moisture, they are probably the main source of water for these animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar-zeev, M.: The reaction of mosquitos to moisture and high humidity. Entomologia exp. appl.3, 198–211 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beament, J. W. L., Noble-Nesbitt, J., Watson, J. A. L.: The waterproofing mechanism of arthropods. III. Cuticular permeability in the firebrat,Thermobia domestica (Packard). J. exp. Biol.41, 323–330 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, P. A.: Heat, moisture, and animal life in deserts. Proc. roy. Soc. B96, 123–131 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L.: Terrestrial animals in dry heat: Arthropods. In: Handbook of physiology. Adaptation to the environment, p. 451–465, D. B. Gill, ed. Washington, D. C.: Am. Physiol. Soc., 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L., Chadwick, M. J.: Life in deserts, 218 p. Philadelphia: Dufour 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edney, E. B.: Laboratory studies on the bionomics of the rat fleas,Xenopsylla grasiliensis, Baker, andX. cheopis, Roths. Bull. ent. Res.38, 263–280 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edney, E. B.: The water relations of terrestrial arthropods, 108 p. London: Cambridge University Press 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edney, E. B.: Absorption of water vapor from unsaturated air byArenivaga sp. (Polyphagidae, Dictyoptera). Comp. Biochem. Physiol.19, 387–408 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edney, E. B.: The body temperature of tenebrionid beetles in the Namib desert of southern Africa. J. exp. Biol.55, 253–272 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friauf, J. J., Edney, E. B.: A new species ofArenivaga from desert sand dunes in southern California (Dictyoptera: Polyphagidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash.71, 1–7 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, N. F.: Micrometerology and energy exchange in two desert arthropods. Ecology51, 434–44 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. J.: Competition and thermoregulatory behavior of the Namib desert tenebrionid beetle genusCardiosis. Ecology52, 810–822 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, J. L.: The biology of mycorrhiza, 233 p. New York: Interscience Publishers 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawke, S. D., Farley, R. D.: Antennal chemoreceptors of the desert burrowing cockroach,Arenivaga sp. Tissue & Cell3, 649–664 (1971 a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawke, S. D., Farley, R. D.: The role of pore structures in the selective permeability of antennal sensilla of the desert borrowing cockroach,Arenivaga sp. Tissue & Cell3, 665–674 (1971 b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J. E., Hanegan, J. L., Wilkin, P. J., Heath, M. S.: Adaptation of the thermal responses of insects. Amer. Zool.11, 145–156 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, J. E., Wilkin, P. J.: Temperature responses of the desert cicadeDiceroprocta apache (Homoptera, Cicadidae). Physiol. Zool.43, 145–154 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, I. A. H.: Sense organs in the antennae ofAnopheles maculipennis atroparvus (v. Thiel), and their possible function in relation to the attraction of female mosquitos to man. Acta trop. (Basel)19, 1–57 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, E. C.: The North American deserts, 308 p. Standford: Standford University Press 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacher, V.: Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen an einzelnen Rezeptoren für Geruch, Kohlendioxyd, Luftfeuchtigkeit und Temperatur auf den Antennen der Arbeitsbiene und der Drohne (Apis mellifica L.). Z. vergl. Physiol.48, 587–623 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble-Nesbitt, J.: Water balance in the firebrat,Thermobia domestica (Packard). Exchanges of water with the atmosphere. J. exp. Biol.50, 745–769 (1969).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L. M.: Loci of sensory end-organs used by mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti (L.) andAnopheles quadrimaculatus Say) in receiving host stimuli. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer.44, 59–74 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L. M., Willis, E. R.: Possible hygroreceptors inAedes aegypti (L.) andBlattella germanica (L.). J. Morph.91, 1–14 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruibal, R., Tevis, L., Roig, V.: The terrestrial ecology of the spadefoot toadScaphiopus hammondii. Copeia 571–584 (1969).

  • Slatyer, R. O.: Plant-water relationships, 366 p. New York: Academic Press 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M. E.: Control of humidity with potassium hydroxide, sulphuric acid, or other solutions. Bull. ent. Res.42, 543–555 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, R. G. D., Torrie, J. H.: Principles and procedures of statistics, 481 p. New York: McGraw-Hill 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tevis, L.: Interrelations between the harvester antVeromessor pergandei (Mahr) and some desert ephemerals. Ecology39, 695–704 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weast, R. C., Ture, G. L., Selby, S. M., Sunshine, I.: Handbook of chemistry and physics, 51st ed. Cleveland: Chemical Publ. Co. 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Went, F. W., Stark, N.: The biological and mechanical role of soil fungi. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash..)60, 497–804 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, P. W., Green, C. C.: Humidity responses from the antennae of the cockroachLeucophaea maderae. Naturwissenschaften54, 499 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hawke, S.D., Farley, R.D. Ecology and behavior of the desert burrowing cockroach,Arenivaga sp. (Dictyoptera, Polyphagidae). Oecologia 11, 263–279 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01882784

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01882784

Keywords

Navigation