Skip to main content
Log in

Familial pericentric and paracentric inversions of chromosome 1

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We investigated 33 individuals (21 carriers) from one family with a pericentric inversion involving a large part of chromosome 1 (1p36.1→1q32). In addition, we investigated 15 individuals (10 carriers) from another family with a paracentric inversion of a small part of chromosome 1(1p32→1p36.1). In each family, the index patient was ascertained because three miscarriages had occurred. Each carrier of these inversions was phenotypically normal. If the miscarriages of the index patients are excluded, the frequency of recognized miscarriages among the carriers of childbearing age was 9% (4 of 46) for the family with pericentric inversion and 17% (4 of 23) for the family with paracentric inversion. One of the pericentric inv(1) carriers had had a stillborn daughter. The carriers of the pericentric inversion who were of childbearing age had 41 children; carriers of the paracentric inversion who were of childbearing age had 19 children. No live-born children with birth defects were observed in either family. This evidence, together with the low frequency of miscarriages, suggests that crossover within the inversion loop occurs much less frequently than might be expected from the large size of this inversion. Our investigation suggests that the risk of recognized miscarriages, stillbirths, and live-born children with recombinant chromosomes who have birth defects may be much lower for inv(1) carriers than previously reported. The risk of having a malformed child because of a recombinant chromosome is probably less than 3% for carriers of the pericentric inversion and less than 6% for the carriers of the paracentric inversion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhasin MK, Foerster W, Fuhrmann W (1973) A cytogenetic study of recurrent abortion. Humangenetik 18:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Boué A, Gallano P (1984) A collaborative study of the segregation of inherited chromosome structural rearrangements in 1356 prenatal diagnoses. Prenat Diagn 4:45–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Callen DF, Woollatt E, Sutherland GR (1985) Paracentric inversions in man. Clin Genet 28:87–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Crippa L, Ferrier S (1975) Etude cytogénétique d'un cas de syndrome de Fanconi avec inversion pericentrique familiale. J Genet Hum 23:7–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel A (1979) Structural differences in reciprocal translocations: potential for a model of risk in Rep. Hum Genet 51:171–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel A (1981) Structural differences in pericentric inversions. Application to a model of risk of recombinants. Hum Genet 56:321–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Deroover J, Fryns JP, Haegeman J, Van den Berghe H (1979) Paracentric inversion in the short arm of chromosome 1. Hum Genet 49:117–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewald (1983) Modern methods of chromosome analysis and their application in clinical practice. Clin Lab Annu 2:1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryns JP, Kleczkowska A, Van den Berghe H (1986) Paracentric inversions in man. Hum Genet 73:205–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldo A, Silva E, Martínez I, Campos C, Guzmán J (1981) Pericentric inversions of chromosome 1 in three sterile brothers. Hum Genet 58:226–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Groupe de Cytogénéticiens Français (1986a) Paracentric inversions in man: a French collaborative study. Ann Génét (Paris) 29:169–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Groupe de Cytogénéticiens Français (1986b) Pericentric inversions in man: a French collaborative study. Ann Génét (Paris) 29:129–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Haapala K, Herva R, Leisti J (1983) Cited by Madan K, Seabright M, Lindenbaum RH, Bobrow M (1984) Paracentric inversions in man. J Med Genet 21:407–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Heemert C van (1977) Somatic pairing and meiotic nonrandom disjunction in a pericentric inversion of Hylemya antiqua (Meigen). Chromosoma 59:193–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoegerman SF (1979) Chromosome 13 long arm interstitial deletion may result from maternal inverted insertion. Science 205:1035–1036

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoo JJ, Lorenz R, Fisher A, Fuhrmann W (1982) Tiny interstitial duplication of proximal 7q in association with a maternal paracentric inversion. Hum Genet 62:113–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Peebles PN (1978) Familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 1 with a note on reproductive risks. Hum Genet 45:123–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs PA, Buckton KE, Cunningham C, Newton M (1974) An analysis of the break points of structural rearrangements in man. J Med Genet 11:50–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser P (1984) Pericentric inversions: problems and significance for clinical genetics. Hum Genet 68:1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly TE, Wyandt H, Kasprzak R, Ennis J, Willson K, Koch V, Schnatterly P (1979) Paracentric inversion: probable mechanism for an interstitial 3p deletion in a patient with multiple anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 31:100A (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleczkowska A, Fryns JP, Van den Berghe H (1987) Pericentric inversions in man: personal experience and review of the literature. Hum Genet 75:333–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee CSN, Ying KL, Bowen P (1974) Position of the Duffy locus on chromosome 1 in relation to breakpoints for structural rearrangements. Am J Hum Genet 26:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton NE, Jacobs PA, Frackiewicz A, Law P, Hilditch CJ (1975) The effect of structural aberrations of the chromosomes on reproductive fitness in man. I. Methodology. Clin Genet 8:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounoud RL, Klein D, Bettschart W, Cabrol C (1976) A clinical and cytogenetic investigation carried out in a special institution for mentally retarded patients. Preliminary results concerning 82 cases of oligophrenia. J Genet Hum 24:297–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Mules EH, Stamberg J (1984) Reproductive outcomes of paracentric inversion carriers: report of a liveborn dicentric recombinant and literature review. Hum Genet 67:126–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray J, Patil S, Fatemi C, Aschbacher A, Buetow K, Ferrell R, Miles J, Smith M, Carlock L (1985) Effect of a large pericentric inversion of chromosome 4 on meiotic recombination. Am J Hum Genet [Suppl] 37:A109

  • Nance WE, Engel E (1967) Human cytogenetics: a brief review and presentation of new findings. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 49:1436–1454

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (1978) An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature ISCN 1978. Cytogenet Cell Genet 21:309–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera H, Alvarez-Arratia MC, Moller M, Díaz M, Cantú JM (1984) Familial inv(1)(p3500q21.3) associated with azoospermia. Hum Genet 66:165–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Romain DR, Columbano-Green LM, Whyte S, Smythe RH, Parfitt RG, Gebbie OB, Chapman CJ (1983) Familial paracentric inversion of 1p. Am J Med Genet 14:629–634

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanitz G, Schmid P, Hägele C, Daffner HW, Grosse K-P (1977) Partial deletion of 1q, following a pericentric inversion, in a boy with multiple minor morphologic anomalies and mental retardation. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 26:173–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah HO, Shaham M, Jenkins EC, Davis JG, Babu A, Verma RS (1986) Prenatal diagnosis of a rare pericentric inversion of chromosome 1[inv(1)(p36q12)]. Am J Hum Genet [Suppl] 39:A265 (abstr)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes RS, Muller H, Klisak I (1979) Retinoblastoma with 13q-chromosomal deletion associated with maternal paracentric inversion of 13q. Science 203:1027–1029

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl-Maugé C, Weiss-Wichert P, Propping P (1982) Familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 1 in a boy with Goldenhar's syndrome. Hum Genet 61:78

    Google Scholar 

  • Stührenberg M (1983) De novo inversion 1, in amniotic, fluid cell cultures. Hum Genet 64:412

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GR, Gardiner AJ, Carter RF (1976) Familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 19,inv(19)(p13q13) with a note on genetic counselling of pericentric inversion carriers. Clin Genet 10: 54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Therman E (1980) Human chromosomes: structure, behavior, effects. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 150–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Tóth A, Gaál M, Sára G, Lászlo J (1982) Pericentric inversion of chromosome 1 in an azoospermic man. J Med Genet 19:303–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Trunca C, Opitz JM (1977) Pericentric inversion of chromosome 14 and the risk of partial duplication of 14q (14q31→14qter). Am J Med Genet 1:217–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Tüür S, Käosaar M, Mikelsaar A-V (1974) 1q+ variants in a normal adult population (one with a pericentric inversion). Humangenetik 24:217–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Valcárel E, Benítez J, Martínez P, Rey JA, Sánchez Cascos A (1983) Cytogenetic recombinants from a female carrying a paracentric inversion of the short arm of chromosome number 5. Hum Genet 63:78–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Linden AG, Pearson PL, Van de Kamp JJ (1975) Cytological assessment of meiotic exchange in a human male with a pericentric inversion of chromosome no 4. Cytogenet Cell Genet 14:126–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyandt HE, Kasprzak R, Ennis J, Willson K, Koch V, Schnatterly P, Wilson W, Kelly TE (1980) Interstitial 3p deletion in a child due to paternal paracentric inserted inversion. Am J Hum Genet 32:731–735

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, D.D., Dobyns, W.B., Gordon, H. et al. Familial pericentric and paracentric inversions of chromosome 1. Hum Genet 79, 315–320 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282168

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00282168

Keywords

Navigation