Skip to main content
Log in

The fragile site (16)(q22)

II. Sister chromatid exchanges

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In the lymphocytes of heterozygous carriers of the rare autosomal fragile site (16)(q22) an exceptionally high frequency of sister chromatid exchanges was demonstrated at the induced fragile site by means of simultaneous berenil and BrdU treatment of the cultures. The rate of sister chromatid exchanges at q22 is also increased in the fragile chromosome 16 by treating the cells with BrdU alone. The possible reasons for the preferential occurrence of induced and spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges at fra (16)(q22) are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bostock CJ, Christie S (1976) Analysis of the frequency of sister chromatid exchange in different regions of chromosomes of the kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii). Chromosoma 56:275–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrano AV, Wolff S (1975) Distribution of sister chromatid exchanges in the cuchromatin and heterochromatin of the Indian muntjac. Chromosoma 53:361–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernos JE, Rattner JB, Martin RH (1986) An investigation of human sperm pronuclear chromosome “gaps” using scanning electron microscopy. Cytogenet Cell Genet 42:57–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Croci G (1983) BrdU-sensitive fragile site on long arm of chromosome 16. Am J Hum Genet 35:530–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossen PE (1982) SCE in lymphocytes. In: Sandberg AA (ed) Progress and topics in cytogenetics, vol 2: Sister chromatid exchange. Liss, New York, pp 175–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossen PE, Drets ME, Arrighi FE, Johnston DA (1977) Analysis of the frequency and distribution of sister chromatid exchanges in cultured human lymphocytes. Hum Genet 35:345–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux B, Laurent C, Couturier J, Lejeune J (1973) Coloration par l'acridine orange des chromosomes préalablement traités par le 5-bromodèoxyuridine (BUDR). CR Acad Sci (D) 276:3179–3181

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux B, Fosse AM, Prieur M, Lejeune J (1974) Analyses des échanges de chromatides dans les cellules somatiques humaines. Chromosoma 53:361–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Festy B, Lallemant AM, Riou G, Brack C, Delain E (1970) Mécanisme d'action des diamidines trypanocides. Importance de la composition en bases dans l'association berenil-polynucléotides. CR Acad Sci (D) 271:684–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison CJ, Jack EM, Allen TD, Harris R (1983) The fragile X: a scanning electron microscope study. J Med Genet 20:280–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Krey AK (1980) Non-intercalative binding to DNA. In: Hahn FE, Kersten W, Szybalski W (eds) Progress in molecular and subcellular biology, vol 7. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 43–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt SA (1974) Localization of sister chromatid exchanges in human chromosomes. Science 185:74–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu LF, Liu C-C, Alberts BA (1980) Type II DNA topoisomerases: enzymes which unknot a topologically knotted DNA molecule via a reversible double strand break. Cell 19:697–707

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter RB (1980) A replication model for sister-chromatid exchange. Mutat Res 70:337–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Painter RB (1982) A replication model for sister chromatid exchange. In: Sandberg AA (ed) Progress and topics in cytogenetics, vol 2: Sister chromatid exchange. Liss, New York, pp 115–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry P, Wolff S (1974) New Giemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids. Nature 251:156–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg AA (1982) Sister chromatid exchange in human states. In: Sandberg AA (ed) Progress and topics in cytogenetics, vol 2: Sister chromatid exchange. Liss, New York, pp 619–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanfilippo S, Neri G, Tedeschi B, Carlo-Stella N, Triolo O, Serra A (1983) Chromosomal fragile sites: preliminary data of a population survey. Clin Genet 24:295

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid M, Klett C, Niederhofer A (1980) Demonstration of a heritable fragile site in human chromosome 16 with distamycin A. Cytogenet Cell Genet 28:87–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid M, Hungerford DA, Poppen A, Engel W (1984) The use of distamycin A in human lymphocyte cultures. Hum Genet 65:377–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid M, Feichtinger W, Jeßberger A, Köhler J, Lange R (1986) The fragile site (16)(q22). I. Induction by AT-specific DNA-ligands and population frequency. Hum Genet 74:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzacher HG, Gropp A, Ruzicka F (1976) Fine structure of 33258 H-treated chromosomes. Hum Genet 33:259–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetka DG (1982) Operative and non-operative mechanisms of sister chromatid exchange. In: Sandberg AA (ed) Progress and topics in cytogenetics, vol 2: Sister chromatid exchange. Liss, New York, pp 99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GR, Jacky PB, Baker EG (1984) Heritable fragile sites on human chromsomes. XI. Factors affecting expression of fragile sites at 10q25, 16q22, and 17p12. Am J Hum Genet 36:110–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker JD, Christensen ML, Strout CL, Carrano AV (1986) Determination of the baseline sister chromatid exchange frequency in human and mouse peripheral lymphocytes using monoclonal antibodies and very low doses of bromodeoxyuridine. Cytogenet Cell Genet 43:38–42

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmid, M., Feichtinger, W. & Haaf, T. The fragile site (16)(q22). Hum Genet 76, 365–368 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272446

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00272446

Keywords

Navigation