Skip to main content
Log in

The genetic significance of accessory bisatellited marker chromosomes

  • Original Investigations
  • Published:
Human Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ten new cases of accessory bisatellited marker chromosomes examined in different laboratories are reported. As a basis for genetic counselling in the context of prenatal diagnosis a cytogenetic categorization of such marker chromosomes is proposed and an estimation of the genetic risk associated with each category is carried out. The results are as follows:

  1. 1.

    There is no increased risk for offspring with abnormal phenotype born to a healthy carrier of an accessory bisatellited marker chromosome with either a single or two closely adjacent C-bands (Category AI or AII).

  2. 2.

    The unbiased sample of cases with de novo accessory bisatellited marker chromosomes of categories AI and AII is too small to allow a satisfactory estimation of the actual risk that, in case of such a prenatal finding, the foetus may not show a normal phenotype as a consequence of the marker chromosome. There is, however, evidence that this risk may be lower than 10%.

  3. 3.

    Accessory bisatellited marker chromosomes showing a discrete pattern of G- or R-bands situated between two distant C-bands (Category AIII) usually indicate a chromosomal imbalance giving rise to an abnormal phenotype. Mosaic carriers of such dicentric marker chromosomes may, however, present a normal phenotype.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aitken J, Brunton M, Jacobs PA, Price WH, McColl K (1971) Chromosome studies on male patients at a mental subnormality hospital. Clin Genet 2: 338–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Armendares S, Buentello L, Cuevas-Sosa A, Cantú-Garza JM (1969) Familial extra-centric bisatellited chromosome. Cytogenetics 8: 177–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch HD, de Azevedo Moreira LM, Röhrborn G, Claussen U, Gebauer HJ (1980) Possible origin of a small bisatellited additional chromosome. Hum Genet 54: 319–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein R, Hakim C, Hardwick B, Nurse GT (1978) Significance of detection of extra metacentric microchromosome in amniotic cell culture. J Med Genet 15: 136–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgaonkar S, Schimke RN, Thomas H (1971) Report of five unrelated patients with a small metacentric, extra chromosome or fragment. J Genet Hum 19: 207–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges WH, Wald N (1963) A diminutive satellited chromosome in a father and in one of two true hermaphrodite progeny. Midwest Soc Pediat Res 63: 474–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Brøndum-Nielsen K, Dyggve H, Friedrich U, Hobolth N, Lyngbye T, Mikkelsen M (1978) Small metacentric nonsatellited extra chromosome. Report of five mentally retarded individuals and review of literature. Contribution to further delineation of a new syndrome. Hum Genet 44: 59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabro a, Lungarotti MS, Dallapiccola B (1980) A comment on the paper: Recurrence of Down syndrome associated with microchromosome. By Ramos C, Rivera L, Benitez J, Tejedor E, and Sanchez-Cascos A. Hum Genet 53: 287–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmi R, Abeliovich D, Bar-Ziv J, Karplus M, Cohen MM (1980) Malformation syndrome associated with small extra chromosome. Am J Med Genet 5: 101–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Harris J (1980) Prenatal diagnosis in the presence of an extra small chromosome in amniotic cell culture. Ann Génét (Paris) 23: 97–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall BF, Carrel RE, Sparkes RS (1972) Chromosome findings in 700 children referred to a psychiatric clinic. J Pediatr 80: 62–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel A (1979) Normal phenotype and partial trisomy for the G positive region of chromosome 21. J Med Genet 16: 227–235

    Google Scholar 

  • De Falco JE, Willey AM (1978) Three cases of partial tetrasomy 15. Am J Hum Genet 30: 17A

  • De Gutierrez AC, Salamanca F, Lisker R, Segovia A (1975) Supernumerary bisatellited chromosome in a family ascertained through a patient with Sturge-Weber syndrome. Ann Génét (Paris) 18: 45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzarlieva R, Efinski D, Šopova M (1975) Genetic prognosis and counseling in the presence of extra small chromosomes. J Génét Hum 23: 197–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbin AJ, Wilson MG, Towner JW, Forsman I (1971) An inherited 1:G translocation. J Med Genet 8: 536–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis JR, Marshall R, Penrose LS (1962) An aberrant small acrocentric chromosome. Ann Hum Genet 26: 77–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Faed MJW, Robertson J, Field AS, Mellon JP (1979) A chromosome survey of a hospital for the mentally subnormal. Clin Genet 16: 191–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer-Michaelsen K, Lundsteen C, Juul Hansen F (1979) Prader-Willi syndrome and chromosomal mosaicism 46,XX/46,XY, +mar in two cases. Clin Genet 16: 147–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried K, Rosenblatt M (1979) A familial extra small marker autosome in persons with normal phenotype. Hum Hered 29: 371–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich U, Nielsen J (1974) Bisatellited extra small metacentric chromosome in newborns. Clin Genet 6: 23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace E, Sills J (1978) The occurrence of a ring 18, an accessory bisatellited fragment, and trisomy 21 within one sibship. Hum Genet 43: 111–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas-Andela H, Hansen S, Foerster W, Fuhrmann W (1981) Familial additional chromosomal fragment ascertained in amniotic cell culture. Clin Genet 19: 46–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrichs I, Wolf M, Steinbach P, Teller WM (1982) Diskrete klinische Auffälligkeiten bei kleinem überzähligem ringförmigem Chromosomenfragment mit aktiver NOR. Wissenschaftliche Information der Milupa AG 8: 393–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn H, Reinwein H, Engel W (1970) Genetic studies on a minute centric fragment transmitted through three generations. Cytogenetics 9: 186–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoo JJ, Forster C, Kindermann I, Zabel B, Hansen S (1974) Supernumerary small ring chromosome. Humangenetik 25: 17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoo JJ, Drummond M, Parslow I, Chambers D (1980) The ring nature of a tiny supernumerary chromosome fragment. Am J Med Genet 5: 331–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Peebles PN (1979) A familial bisatellited extra metacentric microchromosome in man. J Hered 70: 347–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn G, Shaham M, Ornoy A, Beyth Y, Cohen MM (1978) Small marker chromosome mosaicism confirmed in two cases ascertained prenatally. Am J Med Genet 2: 167–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieber E, Shah P, Hack M (1978) Hazards of amniocentesis: An unidentifiable fragment. Clin Genet 14: 130–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattei MG, Mattei JF, Vidal I, Giraud F (1980) Advantages of silver staining in seven rearrangements of acrocentric chromosomes, excluding Robertsonian translocations. Hum Genet 54: 365–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee D, Burdette WJ (1966) A familial minute isochromosome. Am J Hum Genet 18: 62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy MT, Jenkyn J (1972) Results of 538 chromosome studies on patients referred for cytogenetic analysis. Med J Aust 2: 1333–1338

    Google Scholar 

  • Neri G, Cagiano Malvezzi D, Serra A, Bova R, Pelino A, Maugiatti L (1980) Properties and significance of a small chromosome in amniotic fluid cells. Clin Genet 18: 253–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton MS, Cunningham C, Jacobs PA, Price WH, Fraser IA (1972) Chromosome survey of a hospital for the mentally subnormal. Part 2: Autosome abnormalities. Clin Genet 3: 226–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J, Rasmussen K (1975) Extra marker chromosome in newborn children. Hereditas 81: 221–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen J, Hreidarsson AB (1973) Father and daughter with presumptive isochromosome. Satellites-short arms D or G. Humangenetik 19: 271–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata K, Iinuma K, Kamimura K, Morinaga R, Kato J (1977) A case report of a presumptive +i(18p) associated with serum IgA deficiency. Clin Genet 11: 184–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer RA, Diekmann L, Buchner T (1967) Familial occurrence of a small metacentric extra chromosome with satellites on both ends. Ann Génét (Paris) 10: 124–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Power MM, Barry RG, Cannon DE, Materson JG (1977) Familial partial trisomy 15. Ann Génét (Paris) 20: 159–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Price WH, Brunton M, Buckton K, Jacobs PA (1976) Chromosome survey ofnew patients admitted to the four maximum security hospitals in the United Kingdom. Clin Genet 9: 389–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Prieto F, Badia L, Ribes C, Medina VH (1981) Trisomie 21 par translocation 21/21 chez deux fils d'une mere avec un microchromosome surnumeraire. Ann Génét (Paris) 24: 117–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos C, Rivera L, Benitez J, Tejedor E, Sanchez-Cascos A (1979) Recurrence of Down syndrome associated with microchromosome. Hum Genet 49: 7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci N, Ventimiglia B, Preto G (1968) Transmission d'un petit chromosome surnuméraire dans une famille avec deux cas de trisomie 21. Ann Génét (Paris) 11: 114–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridler MAC, Berg JM, Pendrey J, Saldaña P, Timothy JAD (1970) Familial occurrence of a small, supernumerary metacentric chromosome in phenotypically normal women. J Med Genet 7: 148–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocci M, Stormi M, Archidiacono N, Filippi G (1979) Extra small metacentric chromosome identified as i(18p). J Med Genet 16: 69–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde RA (1965) A masculinizing syndrome associated with a doubly unsatellited extra chromosome. J Med Genet 2: 243–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Romain DR, Columbano-Green L, Smythe RH, Dukes PCM (1979) Discovery of an inherited bisatellited microchromosome in amniotic cell culture. Clin Genet 16: 183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmasi AM, Malcolm S, Elliot T, Williamson R, Ferguson-Smith MA (1980) Nucleolus-organiser regions in familial extra metacentric human chromosomes. Heredity 44: 63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinzel A, Schmid W, Fraccaro M, Tiepolo L, Zuffardi O, Opitz JM, Lindsten J, Zetterqvist P, Enell H, Baccichetti C, Tenconi R, Pagon RA (1981) The “cat eye syndrome”: Dicentric small marker chromosome probably derived from a no. 22 (tetrasomy 22pter→q11) associated with characteristic phenotype. Report of 11 patients and delineation of the clinical picture. Hum Genet 57: 148–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreck PR, Breg WR, Erlanger BF, Miller OJ (1977) Preferential derivation of abnormal human G-group-like chromosomes from chromosome 15. Hum Genet 36: 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Fraser IS, Shearman RP (1981) A 13-year-old girl with karyotype 47,XX,+i(22)(q11). J Med Genet 18: 61–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KD, Steinberger E, Steinberger A, Perloff W (1965) A familial centric chromosome fragment. Cytogenetics 4: 219–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Soudek D, Sroka H (1977) C-bands in seven cases of accessory small chromosomes. Clin Genet 12: 285–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Soudek D, McCreary BD, Laraya P, Dill FJ (1973) Two kinships with accessory bisatellited chromosomes. Ann Génét (Paris) 2: 101–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed RM, Johnston AW, Evans HJ (1976) Chromosome survey of total population of mentally subnormal in north-east of Scotland. J Med Genet 13: 295–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbach P, Djalali M (1983) Ineffectivity of accessory bisatellited marker chromosomes in inducing meiotic nondisjunction. Hum Genet 64: 402–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetten G, Sroka-Zaczek B, Corson VL (1981) Prenatal detection of an accessory chromosome identified as an inversion duplication (15). Hum Genet 57: 357–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RE, Patterson RB, Goodman HO (1966) Possible autosomal isochromosome in a malformed child. Am J Dis Child 111: 327–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Šubrt I, Prchlikova H (1970) An extra chromosomal centric fragment in an infant with stigmata of Down's syndrome. J Med Genet 7: 407–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland GR, Murch AR, Gardiner AJ, Carter RF, Wiseman C (1976) Cytogenetic survey of a hospital for the mentally retarded. Hum Genet 34: 231–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Toomey KE, Mohandas T, Leisti J, Szalay G, Kaback MM (1977) Further delineation of the supernumerary chromosome in the cat-eye syndrome. Clin Genet 12: 275–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer S, Breau G, Gerald PS (1969) A chromosome survey of 2400 normal newborn infants. J Pediatr 74: 438–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski L, Hassold T, Heffelfinger J, Higgins JV (1979) Cytogenetic and clinical studies in five cases of inv dup(15). Hum Genet 50: 259–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisniewski L, Witt ME, Ginsberg-Fellner F, Wilner J, Desnick RJ (1980) Prader-Willi syndrome and a bisatellited derivative of chromosome 15. Clin Genet 18: 42–47

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinbach, P., Djalali, M., Hansmann, I. et al. The genetic significance of accessory bisatellited marker chromosomes. Hum Genet 65, 155–164 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286654

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00286654

Keywords

Navigation