Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of tentacle regeneration as a biological assay inHydra

  • Published:
Wilhelm Roux's archives of developmental biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Tentacle number in non-buddingHydra attenuata, randomly selected from mass culture varies <0.5 tentacles over a 3 month period. Replicate samples of untreated regenerates (n=50–60), however, show some variability in mean tentacle number regenerated (S x0.13–0.15). The variability is similar whether experiments are performed using randomly selected animals or animals with identical tentacle numbers. The variability is, further, not the result of profound differences in the time of tentacle initiation in individual animals.

Addition of 10−5 M glutamate or a methanol extract to the assay medium results in both an earlier appearance of tentacles and in more tentacles being regenerated during early time periods. The mean tentacle number of methanol extract-treated animals is significantly higher than the mean tentacle number of either control or glutamate-treated animals at all time periods examined.

The distribution of tentacle number classes among regenerates is normal in control and glutamate-treated animals but nonparametric in methanol extract-treated animals, making statistical analysis of the data using Student'st-test in-appropriate. The usefulness of the Mann WhitneyU and Kruskal-Wallis tests is discussed, as is the appropriateness of tentacle regeneration as an assay forhydra morphogens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berking S (1979) Analysis of head and foot formation inHydra by means of an endogenous inhibitor. Wilhelm Roux's Archives 186:189–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Berking S, Gierer A (1977) Analysis of early stages of budding inhydra by means of an endogenous inhibitor. Wilhelm Roux's Archives 182:117–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett AL (1973) Biology ofhydra. Academic Press, New York London San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, JD (1976) Nonparametric methods for quantitative analysis. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanaev II (1952)Hydra, Lenhoff H (ed) Originally published Soviet Acad Sci, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenhoff HM, Brown RD (1970) Mass culture inhydra: an improved method and its application to other aquatic invertebrates. Lab Animals 4:139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenhoff HM, Loomis WF (1961) The biology ofhydra. Univ of Miami Press, Miami

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh GE, Burnett AL (1966) An analysis of the chemical control of polarized form inhydra. J Exp Zool 163:55–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh-Laurie GE, Flechtner VR, Hood RL (1980) Purification and analysis ofhydra morphogen. In: Tardent P, Tardent R (eds) Developmental and cellular biology of coelenterates. Elsevier/ North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, pp 401–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesh-Laurie GE, Hang L (1972) Tentacle morphogenesis inHydra. I. The morphological effect of actinomycin D. Wilhelm Roux's Archives 169:314–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Muscatine L, Lenhoff HM (1965) Symbiosis ofhydra and algae. I. Effects of some environmental cations on growth of symbiotic and aposymbiotic hydra. Biol Bull 128:415–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Roulon O, Child CM (1937) Observations and experiments on developmental pattern inPelmatohydra oligactis. Physiol Zool 10:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks PG, Davis LE (1979) Production of nervelessHydra attenuata by hydroxyurea treatments. J Cell Sci 37:189–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller HC (1975) A neurohormone fromhydra is also present in the rat brain. J Neurochem 25:187–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller H, Gierer A (1973) Distribution of the head-activating substance inhydra and its localization in membranous particles in nerve cells. J Embryol Exp Morphol 29:27–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaller HC, Schmidt T, Grimmelikhuijzen CJP (1979) Separation and specificity of action of four morphogens fromHydra. Wilhelm Roux's Archives 186:139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S (1956) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Co Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shostak S (1979) Digestive cell and tentacle number in freshly detached buds ofHydra viridis. Int J Invert Repro 1:167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Shostak S, Medic D Jr, Sproull FA, Jones CC (1978) Tentacle number in culturedHydra viridis. Biol Bull 155:220–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. WH Freeman and Co. San Francisco Reading

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flechtner, V.R., Lesh-Laurie, G.E. & Abbott, M.K. Evaluation of tentacle regeneration as a biological assay inHydra . Wilhelm Roux' Archiv 190, 67–72 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848397

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00848397

Key words

Navigation