Abstract
Heterochromatin is a dominant component of the genome in the bottae group of the pocket gopher genus Thomomys, having had a major role in the karyotypic evolution of member species. Heterochromatin characteristics of two subspecies of T. bottae and one of T. umbrinus were examined with fluorochrome dyes identifying presumptive GC- and AT-rich regions. In two karyotypic forms of T. b. fulvus and in T. umbrinus, chromatin that fluoresces brightly with chromomycin A3 is also C-band positive, although not all heterochromatin fluoresces. However, in T. b. bottae, only euchromatic regions fluoresce brightly with chromomycin. Fluorescence patterns produced with DAPI are the reverse of the chromomycin banding in all karyotypic forms. Heterochromatin in these taxa is thus highly differentiated, exhibiting heterogeneity in staining characteristics, and presumably in underlying DNA sequences, both across the genome within a given chromosomal complement as well as among the different karyotypic races and species of the bottae group of pocket gophers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bonaccorsi S, Pimpinelli S, Gatti M (1981) Cytological dissection of sex chromosome heterochromatin of Drosophila hydei. Chromosoma 84:391–403
Buys CHCM, Gouw WL, Blenkers JAM, Van Dalen CH (1981) Heterochromatin of human chromosome 9. Constitutive heterochromatin is revealed by sequential distamycin A/DAPI staining and C-banding. Hum Genet 57:38–30
Comings DE (1978) Mechanisms of chromosome banding and implications for chromosome structure. Ann Rev Genet 12:25–46
Deumling B, Greilhuber J (1982) Characterization of heterochromatin in different species of the Scilla siberica group (Liliaceae) by in situ hybridization of satellite DNAs and fluorochrome banding. Chromosoma 84:535–555
Hack MS, Lawce HJ (1980) In: The association of cytogenetic technologists cytogenetics laboratory manual. University of California, San Francisco
Holmquist G (1975) Hoechst 33258 fluorescent staining of Drosophila chromosomes. Chromsoma 49:333–356
Latt SA, Wohlleb JC (1975) Optical studies of the interaction of 33258 Hoechst with DNA, chromatin and metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 52:297–316
Lee MR, Elder FFB (1980) Yeast stimulation of bone marrow mitoses for cytogenetic investigations. Cytogenet Cell Genet 26:36–40
Lin MS, Comings DE, Alfi OS (1977) Optical studies of the interaction of 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole with DNA and metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 60:15–25
Olert J, Schmid M (1978) Comparative analysis of karyotypes in European shrew species. I. The sibling species Sorex araneus and S. gamellus: Q-bands, G-bands, and position of NORs. Cytogenet Cell Genet 20:308–322
Pardue ML, Gall J (1970) Chromosomal localization of mouse satellite DNA. Science 168:1356–1358
Patton JL (1967) Chromosome studies of certain pocket mice, genus Perognathus (Rodentia: Heteromyidae). J Mamm 48:27–37
Patton JL (1972) Patterns of geographic variation in karyotype in the pocket gopher, Thomomys bottae (Eydoux and Gervais). Evolution 26:574–586
Patton JL (1980) Chromosomal and genetic divergence, population structure, and speciation potential in Thomomys bottae pocket gophers. In: Reig OA (ed) Ecologia y genetica de la especiacion animal. Equinoccio, Caracas, Venezuela, pp 255–295
Patton JL, Sherwood SW (1982) Genome evolution in pocket gophers (genus Thomomys). I. Heterochromatin variation and speciation potential. Chromosoma 85:149–162
Patton JL, Yang SY (1977) Genetic variation in Thomomys bottae pocket gophers: Macrogeographic patterns. Evolution 31:697–720
Rumpler Y, Dutrillaux B (1978) Chromosomal evolution in Malagasy lemurs. III. Chromosome banding studies in the genus Hapalemur and the species Lemur catta. Cytogenet Cell Genet 21:201–211
Sahar E, Latt SA (1978) Enhancement of banding pattern in human metaphase chromosomes by energy transfer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:5650–5654
Sahar E, Latt SA (1980) Energy transfer and binding competition between dyes used to enhance staining differentiation in metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 79:1–28
Schnedl W (1978) Structure and variability of human chromosomes analyzed by recent techniques. Hum Genet 41:1–9
Schnedl W, Abraham R, Foster M, Schweizer D (1981) Differential fluorescent staining of porcine heterochromatin by chromomycin A3/distamycin A/DAPI and D 287/170. Cytogenet Cell Genet 31:249–253
Schweizer D (1976a) Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma 58:307–324
Schweizer D (1976b) DAPI fluorescence of plant chromosomes prestained with actinomycin D. Exp Cell Res 102:408–413
Schweizer D (1980) Simultaneous fluorescent staining of R bands and specific heterochromatin regions (DAPI bands) in human chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 27:190–193
Sen S, Sharma T (1980) Quantitative variation of “Mus musculuslike” constitutive heterochromatin and satellite DNA-sequences in the genus Mus. Chromosoma 81:393–402
Sherwood SW, Patton JL (1982) Genome evolution in pocket gophers (genus Thomomys). II. Variation in cellular DNA content. Chromosoma 85:163–179
Singh BK, Gupta JP (1982) Hoechst fluorescence pattern of heterochromatin in three closely related members of Drosophila. Chromosoma 87:503–506
Viegas-Pequignot E, Benazzou T, Prod'Homme M, Dutrillaux B (1984) Characterization of a very complex constitutive heterochromatin in two Gerbillus species (Rodentia). Chromosoma 89:42–47
Vosa CG (1973) Heterochromatin recognition and analysis of chromosome variation in Scilla siberica. Chromosoma 43:269–278
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barros, M.A., Patton, J.L. Genome evolution in pocket gophers (genus Thomomys). Chromosoma 92, 337–343 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327464
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327464