Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of poiseuille flow of a polar fluid under various boundary conditions with applications to blood flow

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Rheologica Acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, Poiseuille flow of a polar fluid (model of a red blood cell suspension) under various boundary conditions at the wall, viz., slip or no-slip in the axial velocity and couple stresses zero or non-zero at the boundary, is considered from the point of view of its applications to blood flow. Analytic expressions for axial and rotational velocities, flow rate, effective viscosity and stresses are obtained. The magnitudes of the length ratioL and the coupling number N are determined in accordance with concentration and tube radius (in the existing literature, values ofL andN are chosen arbitrarily). Velocity profiles (both axial and rotational) and the variation of the effective viscosity with concentration, tube radius and for various values of the boundary condition parameters are shown graphically. The analytic results obtained are compared with experimental results (for blood flow). It is found that they are in a reasonably good agreement. The effective viscosity exhibits the Inverse Fahraeus-Lindquist Effect in all the cases (including the slip or no-slip in the velocity fields). A method is given for determining the non-zero couple stress boundary condition for a given concentration. Applications of this theory to blood flow are briefly discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dintenfass L (1981) Angiology 32:217–229

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chien S (1981) Recent Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases 2 (Supplement), 21–26

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dintenfass L (1967) Nature (Lond) 215:1099

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fahraeus R, Lindquist T (1931) Am J Physiol 96:562–568

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dintenfass L (1977) Cardiovascular Medicine 2:337–363

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schmid-Schönbein H (1981) Proc IV Int Cong Biorheology 20

  7. Caro CG (1981) Recent Advances in Cardiovascular Diseases 2 (Supplement), 6–11

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fry DL (1976) Hemodynamic Forces in Atherogenesis Cardiovascular Diseases (ed. P Scheinberg), pp. 77–95, New York

  9. Lighthill MJ (1975) Mathematical Biofluid-Dynamics (Philadelphia)

  10. Woodcock JP (1976) Rep Prog Phys 39:65–127

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldsmith HL, Skalak R (1975) Ann Rev Fluid Mech 7:213–247

    Google Scholar 

  12. Chaturani P (1979) Biorheology 16:377–387

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chaturani P (1979) Biorheology 16:109–118

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seshadri V, Jaffrin MY (1977) Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Dynamics 71:262–282

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta BB, Seshadri V (1977) Biorheology 14:133–143

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cowin SC (1974) Advan Appl Mech 14:295–365

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kline KA, Allen SJ, DeSilva CN (1968) Biorheology 5:111–118

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ariman T, Turk MA, Sylvester ND (1974) J Appl Mech (ASME) 41:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brunn P (1975) Rheol Acta 14:1039–1054

    Google Scholar 

  20. Erdogan ME (1980) Rheol Acta 9:434–438

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eringen AC (1966) J Math Mech 16:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stokes VK (1966) Phys Fluids 9:1709–1715

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chaturani P, Mahajan SP (1982) Biorheology 19:507–518

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pennington CJ, Cowin SC (1970) Trans Soc Rheol 14:219–238

    Google Scholar 

  25. Condiff DW, Dahler JS (1964) Phys Fluids 7:842–854

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bugliarello G, Sevilla J (1970) Biorheology 7:85–107

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bugliarello G, Kapur C, Hsiao G (1965) Symposium on Biorheology, Proc 4th Int Cong Rheology (Pt 4), New York, Interscience

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bugliarello G, Hayden JW (1963) Trans Soc Rheol 7:209–229

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goldsmith HL (1972) Proc 13th Int Cong Theor Appl Mech, Heidelberg, Springer 82–103

    Google Scholar 

  30. Einav S, Berman HJ, Fuhro RL, Digiovanni PR, Fure S, Fridman JD (1975) Biorheology 12:207–210

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chaturani P, Biswas D (1983) Biorheology 20:733–744

    Google Scholar 

  32. Chaturani P, Upadhya VS (1977) Biorheology 14:237–246

    Google Scholar 

  33. Astarita G, Marruci G, Palumbo G (1964) Ind Eng Chem Fund 3:333

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cheng DCH (1974) Ind Eng Chem Fund 13:394

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schlichting H (1968) Boundary Layer Theory, p. 78, New York

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaturani, P., Biswas, D. A comparative study of poiseuille flow of a polar fluid under various boundary conditions with applications to blood flow. Rheol Acta 23, 435–445 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01329196

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01329196

Key words

Navigation