Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stiffness changes in chick hair bundles following in vitro overstimulation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

  1. 1.

    The in vitro effect of intense stimulation on the micromechanical stiffness of hair cell sensory hair bundles was studied at three locations on the chick basilar papilla. Threshold levels of hair bundle motion, produced by a water jet stimulus, were examined before and after exposure to a 300 Hz water jet stimulus set at 25 dB above the pre-exposure threshold level.

  2. 2.

    Threshold levels of motion were systematically examined in 8 unexposed control cells. The level of water jet stimulus needed to achieve the detection threshold of motion remained constant in these cells when periodically tested over a 36.5-min interval.

  3. 3.

    Post-exposure changes in the motion detection threshold of hair bundles were examined in 82 hair bundles, and a number of effects were identified: 2.4% of the hair bundles showed no threshold change; 31.7% of the hair bundles had threshold shifts which indicated an increase in stiffness; 18.3% exhibited a threshold shift that indicated a decrease in hair bundle stiffness, but with no recovery; and 47.6% had thresholds that indicated a decrease in hair bundle stiffness with recovery to pre-exposure levels within 16–18 min.

  4. 4.

    The results suggest that chick hair bundles exhibit complex and varied responses to overstimulation which are very different from that seen in the mammal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PRET :

pre-exposure threshold

TS :

threshold shift

VDL :

visual detection level

WD :

working distance

References

  • Adler HJ, Keneally JFX, DeDio RM, Saunders JC (1992) Threshold shift, hair cell loss, and hair bundle stiffness following exposure to 120 and 125 dB pure tones in the neonatal chick. Acta Otolaryngol 112: 444–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Canlon B (1988) The effect of acoustic trauma on the tectorial membrane, stereocilia, and hearing sensitivity: possible mechanisms underlying damage, recovery, and protection. Scand Audiol Suppl 27: 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Canlon B, Miller J, Flock Å, Borg E (1987) Pure tone overstimulation changes the micromechanical properties of the inner hair cell stereocilia. Hearing Res 30: 65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotanche DA, Saunders JC, Tilney LG (1987) Hair cell damage produced by acoustic trauma in the chick cochlea. Hearing Res 25: 267–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Czukas SR, Rosenquist TH, Mulroy MJ (1987) Connections between stereocilia in auditory hair cells of the alligator lizard. Hearing Res 30: 147–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan RK, Grant JW (1993) Finite element analysis of stereocilia stiffness: Interconnection effects. Abstr Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16: 81

    Google Scholar 

  • Flock Å (1977) Physiological properties of sensory hairs in the ear. In: Evans EF, Wilson JP (eds) Psychophysics and physiology of hearing. Academic, New York, pp 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman DM, Weiss TF (1990) Hydrodynamic analysis of a twodimensional model for micromechanical resonance of freestanding hair bundles. Hearing Res 48: 37–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Frishkopf LS, DeRosier DJ (1983) Mechanical tuning of free-standing stereociliary bundles and frequency analysis in the alligator lizard cochlea. Hearing Res 12: 393–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttenplan M, Jenkins OM, Saunders JC (1989) Structural changes in hair cells after incubation in tissue culture medium. Hearing Res 43: 47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard J, Ashmore J (1986) Stiffness of sensory hair bundles in the sacculus of the frog. Hearing Res 23: 93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinke R, Smolders JW (1993) Performance of the inner ear. Prog Brain Res 97: 31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim DJ (1980) Cochlear anatomy related to cochlear micromechanics. A review. J Acoust Soc Am 67 (5): 1686–1695

    Google Scholar 

  • Luft JD, Rosen MR, DeVito MA, Saunders JC (1988) Changes in hair bundle stiffness on cochlear hair cells following overstimulation and ototoxic injury. Trans Penns Acad Ophthalm Otolaryngol 40: 770–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller J, Canlon B, Flock Å (1986) High intensity noise effects on stereocilia mechanics. Abstr Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8: 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller J, Nilsson R, Flock Å, Canlon B (1987) Effects of noise on the nervous system. In: Ellingson RJ, Murray N, Halliday A (eds) The London Symposia (EEG Suppl. 39). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 364–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Neugebauer DC, Thurm U (1985) Interconnections between the stereovilli of the fish inner ear. Cell Tissue Res 240: 449–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Pae SS, Saunders JC (1994) Calcium modulation of sensory hair bundle stiffness on cochlear hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 1153–1157

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickles JO, Corey DP (1992) Mechanoelectrical transduction by hair cells. Trends Neurosci 15(7): 254–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickles JO, Brix J, Comis SD, Gleich O, Köppl C, Manley GA, Osborne MP (1989) The organization of tip links and stereocilia on hair cells of bird and lizard basilar papillae. Hearing Res 41: 31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryals BM, Rubel EW (1982) Patterns of hair cell loss in chick basilar papilla after intense auditory stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 93: 205–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders JC, Coppa N (1986) The contribution of stereocilia, rootlet, and cuticular plate injury to sensorineural hearing loss. In: Collins M, Glattke T, Harker L (eds) Sensorineural hearing loss: Mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment. Univ Iowa Press, Iowa City, pp 29–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders JC, Flock Å (1986) Recovery of threshold in hair-cell stereocilia following exposure to intense stimulation. Hearing Res 23: 233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders JC, Szymko YM (1989a) Micromechanical movements of chick sensory hair bundles to sinusoidal stimuli. In JP Wilson and DT Kemp (eds) Cochlear mechanisms. Plenum, New York, pp 135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders JC, Szymko YM (1989b) The design, calibration, and use of a water microjet for stimulating hair cell sensory hair bundles. J Acoust Soc Am 86: 1797–1804

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders JC, Tilney LG (1982) Species differences in susceptibility to noise exposure. In: Hamernik RP, Henderson D, Salvi RJ (eds) New perspectives on noise induced hearing loss. Raven, New York, pp 229–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders JC, Canlon B, Flock Å (1986a) Growth of threshold shift in hair-cell stereocilia following overstimulation. Hearing Res 23: 245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders JC, Canlon B, Flock Å (1986b) Changes in stereocilia micromechanics following overstimulation in metabolically blocked hair cells. Hearing Res 24: 217–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders JC, Canlon B, Flock Å (1986c) Mechanical changes in stereocilia following overstimulation: Observations and possible mechanisms. In: Salvi RJ, Henderson D, Hamernik RP, Colletti V (Eds.), Basic and applied aspects of noise-induced hearing loss. Plenum, New York, pp. 11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymko YM, Dimitri PS, Saunders JC (1992) Stiffness of hair bundles in the chick cochlea. Hearing Res 59: 241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka K, Smith C (1978) Structure of the chicken's inner ear: SEM and TEM study. Am J Anat 153, 251–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilney LG, Saunders JC (1983) Actin filaments, stereocilia, and hair cells of the bird cochlea. I. Length, number, width, and distribution of stereocilia of each hair cell are related to the position of the hair cell on the cochlea. J Cell Biol 96: 807–821

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilney LG, Egelman EH, DeRosier DJ, Saunders JC (1983) Actin filaments, stereocilia, and hair cells of the bird cochlea II. Packing of actin filaments in the stereocilia and in the cuticular plate and what happens to the organization when the stereocilia are bent. J Cell Biol 96: 822–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilney MS, Tilney LG, DeRosier DJ (1987) The distribution of hair cell bundle lengths and orientations suggests an unexpected pattern of hair cell stimulation in the chick cochlea. Hearing Res 25: 141–151

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Y. M. Szymko

  2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, 19104, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    P. M. Nelson-Adesokan & J. C. Saunders

Authors
  1. Y. M. Szymko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. M. Nelson-Adesokan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. C. Saunders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szymko, Y.M., Nelson-Adesokan, P.M. & Saunders, J.C. Stiffness changes in chick hair bundles following in vitro overstimulation. J Comp Physiol A 176, 727–735 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192621

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192621

Key words

Search

Navigation