Skip to main content
Log in

Sequence learning by honeybees

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bees of several genera make foraging trips on which they visit a series of plants in a fixed order. To help understand how honeybees might acquire such routes, we examined whether (1) bees learn motor sequences, (2) they link motor instructions to visual stimuli, (3) their visual memories are triggered by contextual cues associated with the bees' position in a sequence.

  1. 1.

    Bees were trained to follow a complex route through a series of obstacles inside a large, 250 cm by 250 cm box. In tests, the obstacles were briefly removed and the bees continued to fly the same zig-zag trajectory that they had when the obstacles were present. The bees' complex trajectory could reflect either the performance of a sequence of motor instructions or their attempt to reach fixed points in their environment. When the point of entry to the box was shifted, the bees' trajectory with respect to the new point of entry was relatively unchanged, suggesting that bees have learnt a motor sequence.

  2. 2.

    Bees were trained along an obstacle course in which different flight directions were associated with the presence of different large patches of colour. In tests, the order of coloured patches was reversed, the trajectory followed by the bees was determined by the order of colours rather than by the learnt motor sequence suggesting that bees will readily link the performance of a particular trajectory to an arbitrary visual stimulus.

  3. 3.

    Bees flew through a series of 3 similar compartments to reach a food reward. Passage from one compartment to the next was only possible through the centre of one of a pair of patterns, e.g. white + ve vs. black — ve in the first box, blue + ve vs. yellow -ve in the second, vertical + ve vs. horizontal — ve in the last. In some tests, bees were presented with a white vs. a vertical stimulus in the front compartment, while, in other tests, the same pair of stimuli was presented in the rear compartment. Bees preferred the white stimulus when tested in the first compartment, but chose the vertical stimulus in the last compartment. Bees reaching a compartment are thus primed to recall the stimulus which they normally encounter there.

We argue that the elements which are linked together to form a route are “path-segments”, each of which takes a bee for a given distance in a given direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Collett TS (1992) Landmark learning and guidance in insects. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 337:295–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS (1993) Route following and the retrieval of memories in insects. Comp Physiol Biochem 104A:709–716

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS, Kelber A (1988) The retrieval of visuo-spatial memories by honeybees J Comp Physiol A 163:145–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Collett TS, Dillmann E, Giger A, Wehner R (1992) Visual landmarks and route following in desert ants. J Comp Physiol A 170:435–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingle H (1965) Turn alternation in bugs on a causeway as a delayed compensatory response and the effects of varying inputs and length of straight path. Anim Behav 13:171–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch K von (1967) The dance language and orientation of bees. Oxford Univ Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1976) Foraging specializations of individual bumblebees. Ecol Monogr 46:105–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1971) Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants. Science 171:203–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelber A (1989) Die Bedeutung von Kontextinformation für das Erinnern von Dressurmarken und Mustern bei der Honigbiene (Apis mellifera). Diplom Thesis, Univ Tübingen

  • Manning A (1956) Some aspects of the foraging behaviour of bumblebees. Behaviour 9:164–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel R (1990) Learning, memory and “cognition” in honeybees. In: Kesner RP, Olton DS (eds) Neurobiology of comparative cognition. Lawrence Earlbaum, Hove, pp 237–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller H (1882) Versuche über die Farbenliebhaberei der Honigbiene. Kosmos 12:273–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller M, Wehner R (1988) Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5287–5290

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R (1981) Spatial vision in arthropods. In: Autrum H (ed) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol VII 6C. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 287–616

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehner R, Menzel R (1990) Do insects have cognitive maps? Annu Rev Neurosci 13:403–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss K (1953) Versuche mit Bienen und Wespen in farbigen Labyrinthen. Z Tierpsychol 10:29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss K (1954) Der Lernvorgang bei einfachen Labyrinthdressuren von Bienen und Wespen. Z Vergl Physiol 36:9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth RS, Schlosberg H (1955) Experimental psychology. 3rd ed, Methuen, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Collett, T.S., Fry, S.N. & Wehner, R. Sequence learning by honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 172, 693–706 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195395

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00195395

Key words

Navigation