Skip to main content
Log in

Social dominance in migrant and resident turkey vultures at carcasses: evidence for a despotic distribution?

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We placed carcasses in three different vegetation types in the heterogeneous savannas of central Venezuela to investigate the role of social dominance in habitat use by flocking migrant and resident turkey vultures (Cathartes aura meridionalis and C. a. ruficollis). Migrants foraged primarily in savanna habitats while residents foraged almost exclusively in gallery forest. In the gallery forest residents discovered carrion first significantly more often than migrants, despite there being equal densities of residents and migrants foraging over this habitat. Because residents fed in smaller groups than migrants at carcasses they had higher feeding rates. There was also a negative relationship between group sizes of residents and migrants. The feeding rate of residents declined in response to increased group size of migrants, but group size of residents had no effect. Migrant group size also had a greater effect on resident feeding rates than king vulture presence or absence. When the effect of migrant and resident group size on feeding rates in migrants was compared, the most significant factor was migrant group size. A second analysis showed that both resident group size and presence or absence of king vultures had a significant effect on feeding rates in migrants. Rates of agonistic encounters in migrant and resident turkey vultures increased weakly in relation to group size. However, there was an increase in residents' encounter rate with migrants in relation to increased migrant group size; there was no difference in resident encounter rates with other residents in relation to resident group size. Migrants dominated residents in almost all agonistic interactions over carcasses. We suggest that savanna habitats were less attractive to residents for foraging because they held larger groups of migrants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker MC, Belcher CS, Deutsch LC, Sherman GL, Thompson DB (1981) Foraging success in junco flocks and the effects of social hierarchy. Anim Behav 29:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard CJ, Stephens H (1983) Costs and benefits of single and mixed species flocking in fieldfares (Turdus pilaris) and redwings (T. iliacus). Behaviour 84:91–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake ER (1977) Manual of neotropical birds. Vol 1 Spheniscidae (penguins) to Laridae (gulls and allies). University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CR (1988) Social foraging in cliff swallows: local enhancement, risk sensitivity, competition and the avoidance of predators. Anim Behav 36:780–792

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown L, Amadon D (1968) Eagles, hawks and falcons of the world. Country Life, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CW, Mangel M (1986) The evolutionary advantages of group foraging. Theor Popul Biol 30:45–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS, Fraser JD (1986) Predation on black and turkey vultures. Wilson Bull 98:600–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS, Fraser JD (1987) Food habits of black and turkey vultures in Pennsylvania and Maryland. J Wildl Manage 51:733–739

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Agostino RB, Belanger A, D'Agostino RB Jr (1990) A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. Am Stat 44:316–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis D (1979) Behavior of a breeding population of turkey vultures in west Texas. PhD dissertation, Colorado State University, Fort Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg JF, O'Connell MA, August PV (1979) Density, productivity, and distribution of mammals in two Venezuelan habitats. In: Eisenberg JF (ed) Vertebrate ecology in the northern Neotropics. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, pp 187–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman JB, Askenmo CEH (1984) Social rank and habitat use in willow tit groups. Anim Behav 32:508–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming SP, Smith PC, Seymour NR, Bancroft RP (1992) Ospreys use local enhancement and flock foraging to locate prey. Auk 109:649–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthreaux SA Jr (1978) The ecological significance of behavioral dominance. In: Bateson PPG, Klopfer PH (eds) Perspectives in ethology, vol 3. Plenum, New York, pp 17–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraldeau L-A (1988) The stable group and the determinants of foraging group size. In: Slobodchikoff CN (ed) The ecology of social behavior, Academic Press, London, pp 33–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard JD, Durell Sea le V (1988) The effect of dominance and feeding method on the intake rates of oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralcgus, feeding on mussels. J Anim Ecol 57:827–844

    Google Scholar 

  • Götmark F, Winkler DW, Andersson M (1986) Flock-feeding on fish schools increases individual success in gulls. Nature 319:589–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Hake M, Ekman J (1988) Finding and sharing depletable patches: when group foraging decreases intake rates. Ornis Scand 19:275–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1988) Winter foraging at carcasses by three sympatric corvids, with emphasis on recruitment by the raven, Corvus corax. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23:141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel F (1994) Diversity in body size and feeding morphology within past and present vulture assemblages. Ecology 75:1074–1084

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston DC (1986) Scavenging efficiency of turkey vultures in tropical forest. Condor 88:318–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston DC (1988) Competition for food between Neotropical vultures in forest. Ibis 130:402–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk DA (1988) Ecological separation of small cathartid vultures in South America. PhD dissertation, University of Glasgow, Scotland

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk DA, Currall JEP (1994) Habitat associations of migrant and resident vultures in central Venezuela. J Avian Biol 25: 327–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk DA, Gosler AG (1994) Body condition varies with migration and competition in migrant and resident South American vultures. Auk 111, in press

  • Knight SK, Knight RL (1986) Vigilance patterns of bald eagles feeding in groups. Auk 103:263–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Koester F (1982) Observations on migratory turkey vultures and lesser yellow-headed vultures in northern Colombia. Auk 99:372–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindström K, Ranta E (1993) Foraging group structure among individuals differing in competitive ability. Ann Zool Fenn 30:225–232

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinstry MC, Knight RL (1993) Foraging ecology of wintering black-billed magpies. Auk 110:632–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Heinrich B (1991) Foraging by common ravens in the presence and absence of territory holders: an experimental analysis of social foraging. Anim Behav 42:755–770

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan P, Metcalfe NB (1985) Group foraging in wild brown hares: effects of resource distribution and social status. Anim Behav 33:993–999

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Sutherland WJ (1986) Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models. Anim Behav 34:1222–1242

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker Rabenold P (1983) The communal roost in black and turkey vultures — an information center? In: Wilbur SR, Jackson JA (eds) Vulture biology and management. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 303–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker Rabenold P (1986) Family associations in communally roosting black vultures. Auk 103: 32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker Rabenold P (1987) Roost attendance and aggression in black vultures. Auk 104:647–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker Rabenold P, Decker MD (1989) Black and turkey vultures expand their ranges northwards. Eyas 2:11–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit DR. Bildstein KL (1987) Effect of group size and location within the group on the foraging behavior of white ibises. Condor 89:602–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior KA, Weatherhead PJ (1990) Turkey vultures foraging at experimental food patches: a test of information transfer at communal roosts. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28:385–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior KA, Weatherhead PJ (1991) Competition at the carcass: opportunities for social foraging by turkey vultures in southern Ontario. Can J Zool 69: 1550–1556

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 122–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E (1993) There is no optimal group size. Anim Behav 46:1032–1035

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranta E, Rita H, Lindström K (1993) Competition versus cooperation: success of individuals foraging alone and in groups. Am Nat 142:42–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner JMV (1988) Form and function in avian flight. Curr Ornithol 5:1–66

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1988) SAS user's guide: statistics, 6th edn. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Senar JC, Metcalfe NB (1988) Differential use of local enhancement for finding food by resident and transient siskins. Anim Behav 36:1549–1550

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, Parker GA (1985) Distribution of unequal competitors. In: Sibly RM, Smith RH (eds) Behavioural ecology: ecological consequences of adaptive behaviour. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 255–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Troth RG (1979) Vegetational types on a ranch in the central Llanos of Venezuela. In: Eisenberg JF (ed) Vertebrate ecology in the northern Neotropics. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickery WL, Giraldeau L-A, Templeton JJ, Kramer DL, Chapman CA (1991) Producers, scroungers, and group foraging. Am Nat 137:847–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace MP, Temple SA (1987) Competitive interactions within and between species in a guild of avian scavengers. Auk 104:290–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirk, D.A., Houston, D.C. Social dominance in migrant and resident turkey vultures at carcasses: evidence for a despotic distribution?. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36, 323–332 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167793

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167793

Key words

Navigation