Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacological properties of nebivolol in man

  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aims of the present study were to determine (1) the β1-blocking potency and (2) the β1 adrenoceptor selectivity of nebivolol in man after repeated dosing (7 days) compared with that after a single oral intake and with that after atenolol for 7 days. In addition, it was investigated whether (3) nebivolol has α1-blocking properties which might at least in part explain the vasodilating property of the compound.

Methods

Twelve healthy subjects were randomized in an open, two-way cross-over study. β1-Blocking potency and β1-adrenoceptor selectivity of nebivolol 5 mg once daily (o.d.) were compared with those of atenolol at three doses (25, 50 and 100 mg) o.d. Measurements were performed after 1 and 7 days of drug intake. β1Adrenoceptor potency was assessed by the percentage decrease in exercise-induced tachycardia (AEIT) during β-blockade. β1-Selectivity of nebivolol and atenolol were investigated using the heart rate response to isoprenaline at equipotent β1blocking dosages of both drugs. α1-Blockade of nebivolol was measured using the phenylephrine dose-response test.

Results

ΔEIT after a single oral dose of nebivolol 5 mg (10%) was significantly smaller than after nebivolol 5 mg o.d. for 7 days (15%). After 1 week of treatment no difference was seen in ΔEIT between nebivolol 5 mg o.d. and atenolol 25 mg o.d. (16%). At these dosages the suppression in isoprenaline-induced tachycardia by both drugs did not differ (CD20 ratio 1.7). In contrast to atenolol 25 mg, after 1 week of nebivolol 5 mg o.d., blood pressure decreased. This decrease averaged 10% and — like in a study with hypertensive patients — was similar with that after atenolol 100 mg o.d. None of the phenylephrine test parameters changed from pre-study values after nebivolol.

Conclusions

β1-Blockade of nebivolol 5 mg is larger after repeated dosing than after a single oral intake. After once daily repeated dosing nebivolol 5 mg and atenolol 25 mg are equipotent in β1-antagonism. No difference in β1-selectivity is observed between the two drugs. Nebivolol has no additional α1-blocking property, which may at least in part explain its vasodilating effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van de Water A, Janssens W, Van Nueten J, Xhonneux R, De Crée J, Verhaegen H, Reneman RS, Janssen PAJ (1988) Pharmacological and hemodynamic profile of nebivolol, a chemically novel, potent, and selective β1-adrenergic antagonist. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 11: 552–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McLay JS, Irvine N, McDevitt DG (1991) Clinical pharmacology of nebivolol. Drug Invest 3: S31-S32

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldstein M, Vincent JL, De Smet JM, Barvais L, Van Nueten L, Scheijgrond H, d’Hollander A, Leclerc JL, Kahn RJ (1993) Administration of nebivolol after coronary artery bypass in patients with altered left ventricular function. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 22: 253–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stoleru L, Wijns W, Van Eyll C, Bouvy T, Van Nueten L, Pouleur H (1993) Effects of d-nebivolol and l-nebivolol on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function: comparison with d-l-nebivolol and atenolol. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 22: 183–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Bortel LMAB, Breed JGS, Joosten J, Kragten JA, Lustermans FAT, Mooij JMV (1993) Nebivolol in hypertension: a double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter study assessing its antihypertensive efficacy and impact on quality of life. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 21: 856–862

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lacourcière Y, Lefebvre J, Poirier L, Archambault F, Arnott W (1994) Treatment of ambulatory hypertensives with nebivolol or hydrochlorothiazide alone and in combination. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, factorial-design trial. Am J Hypertens 7: 137–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Bortel LMAB, van Baak MA (1992) Exercise tolerance with nebivolol and atenolol. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 6: 239–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammed AF, Hulks G, Thomson NC, Gould SD (1991) Effects of nebivolol, atenolol and propranolol on airway β-adrenergic responsiveness in normal subjects. Drug Invest 3: S196-S198

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van Peer A, Snoeck E, Woestenborghs R, Van de Velde V, Mannens G, Meuldermans W, Heykants J (1991) Clinical pharmacokinetics of nebivolol; a review. Drug Invest 3: S25-S30

    Google Scholar 

  10. McDevitt DG (1977) The assessment of β-adrenoceptor blocking drugs in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 4: 413–425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shand DG (1983) State-of-the-art: Comparative pharmacology of the β-adrenoceptor blocking drugs. Drugs 25: S92-S99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krämer B, Baiser J, Stubbig K, Krämer G, Kübier W (1986) Comparison of bisoprolol with other β-adrenoceptor blocking drugs. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 8: S46-S57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pringle TH, O’Connor PC, McNeill AJ, Finch MB, Riddell JG, Shanks RG (1986) Effects of ICI141.292 on exercise tachycardia and isoprenaline-induced β-adrenoceptor responses in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 21: 249–258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McGibney D, Singleton W, Silke B, Taylor SH (1983) Observations on the mechanism underlying the differences in exercise and isoprenaline tachycardia after cardioselective and non-selective β-adrenoceptor antagonists. Br J Clin Pharmacol 15: 15–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Arnold JMO, McDevitt DG (1983) Heart rate and blood pressure responses to intravenous boluses of isoprenaline in the presence of propranolol, practolol and atropine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 16: 175–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sumner DJ, Elliot HL, Vincent J, Reid JL (1987) A pragmatic approach to the pressor dose-response as an index of vascular reactivity and adrenoceptor function in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 23: 505–510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sumner DJ, Elliott HL (1987) The pressor dose-response in clinical cardiovascular pharmacology. Br J Clin Pharmacol 23: 499–503

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Rooy P, Van Nueten L, De Crée J (1991) Nebivolol: blood pressure reduction in relation to β-blockade in healthy volunteers. Drug Invest 3: 174–175

    Google Scholar 

  19. George CF, Conolly ME, Fenyvesi T, Briant R, Dollery CT (1972) Intravenously administered isoproterenol sulfate doseresponse curves in man. Arch Intern Med 130: 361–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cleaveland CR, Rangno RE, Shand DG (1972) A standardized isoproterenol sensitivity test. Arch Intern Med 130: 47–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanchez RA, Cianciulli T, Dopico AM (1991) Effects of nebivolol on left ventricular function in patients with essential hypertension. Drug Invest 3: S155-S160

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cockcroft JR, Chowienczyk PH, Brett SE, Chen CPI-H, Dupont AG, Van Nueten L, Wooding SJ, Ritter JM (1995) Nebivolol vasodilates human forearm vasculature: evidence of an L-arginine/NO-dependent mechanism. JPET 274: 1067–1071

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gao YS, Nagao T, Bond RA, Janssens WJ, Vanhoutte PM (1991) Nebivolol induces endothelium-dependent relaxations of canine coronary arteries. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 17: 964–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bowman AJ, Chen CP, Ford GA (1994) Nitric oxide mediated venodilator effects of nebivolol. Br J Clin Pharmacol 38: 199–204

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. De Crée J, Geukens H, Verhaegen H (1991) Non-invasive cardiac haemodynamics of nebivolol. Drug Invest 3: 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wisenbaugh T, Katz I, Davis J, Essop R, Skoularigis J, Middlemost S, Rothlisberger C, Skudicky D, Sareli P (1993) Long-term (3-month) effects of a new beta-blocker (nebivolol) on cardiac performance in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 21: 1094–1100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rousseau MF, Chapelle F, Van Eyll C, Stoleru L, Hager D, Van Nueten L, Pouleur H (1996) Medium-term effects of beta-blockade on left ventricular mechanics: a double-blind, placebo controlled comparison of nebivolol and atenolol in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiac Failure 2: 15–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hjalmarson A, Waagstein F (1994) The role of β-blockers in the treatment of cardiomyopathy and ischemic heart failure. Drugs 47: S31-S40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. CIBIS Investigators and Committees (1994) A randomized trial of β-blockade in heart failure. Circulation 90: 1765–1773

    Google Scholar 

  30. Waagstein F, Bristow MR, Swedberg K, Camerini F, Fowler MB, Silver MA, Gilbert EM, Johnson MR, Goss FG, Hjalmarson A (1993) Beneficial effects of metoprolol in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Lancet 342: 1441–1446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gottlieb SS (1994) β-Blockers for heart failure: where are we now? Curr Opin Cardiol 9: 295–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chatterjee K (1989) Potential use of third-generation β-blockers in heart failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 14: S22-S27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Packer M. Bristow MR, Cohn JN, Colucci WS, Fowler MB, Gilbert EM, Shusterman NH, for the US Carvedilol Heart Failure Study Group (1996) The effect of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 334: 1349–1355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bortel, L.M.A.B.V., Hoon, J.N.J.M.d., Kool, M.J.F. et al. Pharmacological properties of nebivolol in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 51, 379–384 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050217

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050217

Key words

Navigation