Skip to main content
Log in

Diclofenac versus dipyrone in acute renal colic: A double-blind controlled trial

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A randomized, double-blind clinical trial in 50 patients was done to compare the efficacy and tolerance of single doses of intramuscular diclofenac 75 mg and dipyrone 2 g in acute renal colic.

Both drugs were equally effective, but diclofenac was better in terms of complete relief of pain. Vital signs were affected according to the stress and pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. The International Agranulocytosis and Aplastic Anemia Study (1986) Risks of agranulocytosis and aplastic anemia: A first report of their relation to drug use with special reference to analgesics. J Am Med Assoc 256: 1749–1757

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lundstam S, Wahlander L, Leissner KH, Kral JG (1982) Prostaglandine-synthetase inhibition with diclofenac sodium in treatment of renal colic: comparison with use of a narcotic analgesic. Lancet 1: 1096–1097

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vignoni A, Fierro A, Moreschini G, Cau M, Agostino A, Daniele E, Foti G (1983) Diclofenac sodium in ureteral colic: Double-blind comparison trial with placebo. J Int Med Res 11: 303–307

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hetherington JW, Philp NH (1986) Diclofenac sodium versus pethidine in acute renal colic. Br Med J 292: 237–238

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miralles, R., Camí, J., Gutiérrez, J. et al. Diclofenac versus dipyrone in acute renal colic: A double-blind controlled trial. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 33, 527–528 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00544249

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00544249

Key words

Navigation