Skip to main content
Log in

Methods of comparing pharmacokinetics of slow release preparations: a comparison of “Theo-Dur” and “Phyllocontin” in patients with asthma

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The pharmacokinetics of two slow release theophylline preparations “Theo-Dur” (T) containing theophylline only and “Phyllocontin” (P) containing aminophylline have been compared in 12 patients with asthma. Each patient received both treatments in random order. The dose of treatment administered 12 hourly was increased or decreased to produce plasma theophylline concentrations of 10–20 mg/l at clinic visits normally 7 to 8 h after dosing. Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out after at least one week's treatment with this dose. After the first study day patients were crossed over to the second treatment at a dosage providing a similar amount of theophylline. They returned for a second study day after at least one week. Comparison of the dose corrected AUC, time to peak concentrations, within patient coefficients of variation (CV), number of concentration time points falling within 25% of Cmax and percentage fluctuations in plasma concentration showed no significant differences between the two preparations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chang J, Gotcher S, Gushaw JB (1982) Homogeneous enzyme immunoassay for theophylline in serum and plasma. Clin Chem 28: 361–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerstrom PO, Heintz L (1983) Absorption of sustained release theophylline tablets. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Tox 21: 359–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal P, Jusko WJ, Yurchak AM, Franklin BA (1978) Theophylline disposition in obesity. Clin Pharmacol Ther 23: 438–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SHD, Peverel Cooper CA, Turner TH (1985) Personality and theophylline pharmacokinetics. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 28: 429–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson SHD, Wright JM (1983) Sustained serum theophylline concentrations during chronic twice daily administration of a slow release preparation. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 24: 205–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Melethil S, Carlson JD, Haug MT (1982) Predictability of theophylline levels. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 16: 695–697

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger M, Hendeles L (1983) Current concepts. Slow-release theophylline. Rationale and basis for product selection. N Engl J Med 308: 760–764

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Merck Company Foundation Research Fellow in Clinical Pharmacology Division of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Texas, USA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, S.H.D., Shah, K. & Turner, P. Methods of comparing pharmacokinetics of slow release preparations: a comparison of “Theo-Dur” and “Phyllocontin” in patients with asthma. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 30, 313–317 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00541535

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00541535

Key words

Navigation