Skip to main content
Log in

Penbutolol and molsidomine synergism in angina pectoris. A double blind ergometric trial

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In order to test the additional efficacy of the combination of a beta blocker (penbutolol 40 mg single dose) with molsidomine (2 mg single dose), a double blind cross-over trial was performed in 30 patients with stable angina pectoris. Stress tests were done before and 1 h after the beta blocker alone and the combination therapy. Some training effect could be detected on comparing results from the first and second days. Combined therapy showed a better response of resting systolic arterial pressure, resting and maximal diastolic pressure, heart rate gain (from rest to maximal effort) and particularly in the angina severity score. All of these variables changed significantly in comparison to the beta blocker alone, 46 out of 60 post-drug ergometric studies were negative; of the 14 positive tests, 11 followed the beta blocker and only 3 the combined therapy. The combination of a preload reducer molsidomine and a beta blocker may be adequate for patients only partially compensated or with cardiomegaly and/or a depressed ejection fraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Russek HI (1967) Propranolol and isosorbide dinitrate synergism in angina pectoris. Am J Med Sci 254: 406–409

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aronow WS (1972) The medical treatment of angina pectoris. VI. Propranolol as an antianginal drug. Am Heart J 84 (5): 706–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Aronow WS (1972) The medical treatment of angina pectoris. VII. Newer beta-adrenergic blockers as antianginal drugs. Am Heart J 84(/): 834–837

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gillam PMS, Prichard BNS (1965) Use of propranolol in angina pectoris. Br Med J 2: 337–339

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wolfson S, Heinle RA, Herman MV, Kemp HG, Sullivan JM, Gorlin R (1966) Propranolol and angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 18: 345–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. The Norwegian Multicentre Study Group (1981) Timolol-induced in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 304: 801–807

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greenblat DJ, Koch-Weser J (1974) Adverse reactions to beta-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs: a report from the Boston Collaborative drug surveillance program. Drugs 7: 118–129

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grizzle JE (1965) The two-period change-over design and its use in clinical trials. Biometrics 21: 467–480

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hills M, Armitage P (1979) The two-period cross-over clinical trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1: 7–20

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jun HW, Hayes SL, Vallner JJ, Honigberg IL, Rojos AE, Stewart JT (1979) Plasma level profiles and clinical response of penbutolol after three different single oral doses in man. J Clin Pharmacol 19: 415–423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Witchitz S, Kolsky H, Moisson P (1982) Ergometric study of betablocker vasodilator combination. World congress of Cardiology, 9. Moscow, 1982. Abstract 0481, Vol 1

  12. Russek H (1968) Propranolol and isosorbide dinitrate synergism in angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 21: 44

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Battock DJ, Alvarez H, Chidsey CA (1969) Effects of propranolol and isosorbide dinitrate on exercise performance and adrenergic activity in patients with angina pectoris. Circulation 39: 157

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aronow WS, Kaplan MA (1969) Propranolol combined with isosorbide dinitrate versus placebo in angina pectoris. N Engl J Med 280: 847

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stauch M, Nechwatal W, Sigel H, Bitter F, Adam WE (1982) Effects of Molsidomine and metoprolol on global and regional left ventricular function at rest and during exercise in coronary heart disease. World Congress of Cardiology, 9, Moscow, 1982. Abstract 1202, Vol 2

  16. Orodá LA, Vazquez A, Paz N, Aptecar M (1982) Serial echocardiographic evaluation of effects and duration of action of Molsidomine (M). Double blind acute study in normals. World Congress of Cardiology, 9, Moscow, 1982. Abstract 0297, Vol 2

  17. Takeshita A, Nakamura M, Tajima T, Matsuguchi H, Kuroiwa Tanaka A, Kikuchi Y (1977) Long-lasting effect of oral molsidomine on exercise performance. Circulation 55: 401

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Guerchicoff S, Vazquez A, Kunik H, Drajer S, Diaz F (1978) Acute double-blind trial of a new anti-anginal drug: Molsidomine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 13: 247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Majid PA, DeFeyter PJF, Van der Wall EE, Wardeh R, Roos JP (1980) Molsidomine in the treatment of patients with angina pectoris. Acute hemodynamic effects and clinical efficacy. N Engl J Med 302: 1

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balestrini, A.E., Menzio, A.C., Cabral, R. et al. Penbutolol and molsidomine synergism in angina pectoris. A double blind ergometric trial. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 27, 1–5 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02395197

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02395197

Key words

Navigation