Skip to main content
Log in

Size fractionated impactor sampling of aerosol particles over the Atlantic Ocean from Europe to Antarctica as a methodology for source identification of Cd, Pb, Tl, Ni, Cr, and Fe

  • Original Papers
  • Environmental Analysis
  • Published:
Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four different samples of aerosol particles over the North Atlantic, South Atlantic, an area near the equator influenced by Saharan mineral dust, and the Antarctic Ocean were collected on board of the German research vessel “Polarstern” by a six stage cascade impactor system. A continental sample, typical in its size distribution pattern and heavy metal enrichment factors (relative to crust material) for industrialized areas, was used for comparison. To analyse the elements of interest, isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) using the thermal ionization technique was applied. The samples were digested with nitric acid followed by an electrodeposition of the heavy metals to be analysed in alkaline solution. Source identification could be carried out by the distribution of the heavy metals and enrichment factors on the different impactor stages using iron as a reference element for crustal origin. Two opposite types of size distribution patterns were obtained over the Atlantic Ocean. On the one hand, the main heavy metal fraction was found to be associated with the smallest particles collected on the last two impactor stages and the back-up filter with aerodynamic diameters (AD) of less than 0.95 μm. This pattern together with the high enrichment factors of up to several thousand indicates combustion processes and biogenic emissions as possible sources and were typical for cadmium and lead. On the other hand, chromium and iron were preferably associated with the larger particles of >1.5 μm AD. This and the low chromium enrichment factor demonstrate that the earth crust is the major source for these two elements in marine aerosol particles. Thallium and nickel could not be classified by one of these two size distribution patterns, which indicates that at least two different primary sources contribute to the content of these heavy metals in marine aerosol particles depending on the region investigated. Contrary to that, the sample collected over the Antarctic Ocean showed some significant differences. Here, a substantial amount of the total cadmium and lead was associated with the larger particles. However, relatively high enrichment factors found for cadmium, nickel, lead, and thallium in the smallest particles suggest a natural source, probably biogenic activities, in the Antarctic Ocean.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pui DYH, Liu BYH (1988) Physica Scripta 37:252

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davidson CI, Osborn JF (1986) In: Nriagu JO, Davidson CI (eds) Toxic metals in the atmosphere. Wiley, New York, p 355

    Google Scholar 

  3. Willeke K, Whitby KT (1975) J Air Pollut Control Assoc 25:529

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schroeder WH, Dobson M, Kane DM, Johnson ND (1987) J Air Pollut Control Assoc 37:1267

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buerki PR, Gaelli BC, Nyffeler UP (1989) Atmos Environ 23:1659

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marple VA, Chien CM (1980) Environ Sci Technol 14:976

    Google Scholar 

  7. Novick VJ, Alvarez JL (1987) Aeros Sci Technol 6:63

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen BT, Yeh HC (1987) J Aerosol Sci 18:203

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marple VA, Liu BYH (1974) Environ Sci Technol 8:648

    Google Scholar 

  10. Newton GJ, Raabe OG, Mokler BV (1977) J Aerosol Sci 8:339

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wagner H, Georgii HW (1984) Staub-Reinhalt Luft 44:522

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dzubay TG, Hines LE, Stevens RK (1976) Atmos Environ 10:229

    Google Scholar 

  13. Markowski GR (1987) Aerosol Sci Technol 7:143

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marple VA, Rubow KL (1983) Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 44:361

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell JP, Costa PA, Waters S (1988) J Aerosol Sci 19:213

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vaughan NP (1989) J Aerosol Sci 20:67

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gladney ES, Zoller WH, Jones AG, Gordon GE (1974) Environ Sci Technol 8:551

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maenhaut W, Zoller WH, Duce RA, Hoffmann GL (1970) J Geophys Res 84C:2421

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cunningham WC, Zoller WH (1981) J Aerosol Sci 12:367

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schütz L, Rahn KA (1982) Atmos Environ 16:171

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weisel CP, Duce RA, Fasching JL, Heaton RW (1984) J Geophys Res 89D: 11607

    Google Scholar 

  22. Heintzenberg J, Covert DS (1987) Tellus 39B:374

    Google Scholar 

  23. Völkening J, Baumann H, Heumann KG (1988) Atmos Environ 22:1169

    Google Scholar 

  24. Völkening J, Heumann KG (1990) J Geophys Res 95D:20623

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rädlein N, Heumann KG (1992) Int J Environ Anal Chem 48:127

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis CW, Macias ES (1980) Atmos Environ 14:185

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sturges WT, Harrison RM (1989) Atmos Environ 23:1083

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maenhaut W, Raemdonck H, Andreae MO (1987) Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res B22:248

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wouters L, Artaxo P, van Grieken R (1990) Int J Environ Anal Chem 38:427

    Google Scholar 

  30. Maenhaut W (1989) In: Pacyna JM, Ottar B (eds) Control and fate of atmospheric trace metals. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 259

    Google Scholar 

  31. Völkening J, Heumann KG (1988) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 331:174

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lum KR, Betteridge JS, Macdonald RR (1982) Environ Technol Lett 3:57

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chester R, Murphy KJT, Towner J, Thomas A (1986) Chem Geol 54:1

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hamelin B, Grousset FE, Biscaye PE, Zindler A, Prospero JM (1989) J Geophys Res 94C:16243

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chester R, Lin FJ, Murphy KJT (1989) Environ Technol Lett 10:887

    Google Scholar 

  36. Heumann KG (1986) Fresenius Z Anal Chem 325:661

    Google Scholar 

  37. Heumann KG (1988) In: Adams F, Gijbels R, van Grieken R (eds) Inorganic mass spectrometry. Wiley, New York, p 301

    Google Scholar 

  38. Heumann KG (1990) In: Günzler H, Borsdorf R, Fresenius W, Huber W, Kelker H, Lüderwald I, Tölg G, Wisser H (eds) Analytiker Taschenbuch, Vol 9. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, p 191

    Google Scholar 

  39. Barnes IL, Murphy TJ, Gramlich JW, Shields WR (1973) Anal Chem 45:1881

    Google Scholar 

  40. Völkening J, Heumann KG (1986) In: Todd FJF (ed) Advances in mass spectrometry 1985, Part B. Wiley, New York, p 1059

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rahn KA, Schütz L, Jaenicke R (1977) WMO [Publ.] 460 (Air pollut Meas Tech) Part II: 150

  42. Taylor SR (1964) Geochim Cosmochim Acta 28:1273

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mason RP, Fitzgerald WF (1990) Nature 347:457

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Professor Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. J.F.K. Huber on the occasion of his 70th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rädlein, N., Heumann, K.G. Size fractionated impactor sampling of aerosol particles over the Atlantic Ocean from Europe to Antarctica as a methodology for source identification of Cd, Pb, Tl, Ni, Cr, and Fe. Fresenius J Anal Chem 352, 748–755 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323059

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323059

Keywords

Navigation