Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of tropospheric delay prediction models: comparisons with ray-tracing and implications for GPS relative positioning

  • Published:
Bulletin géodésique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ray-tracing is used to examine the accuracy of several well known models for tropospheric delay prediction under varying atmospheric conditions. The models considered include the Hopfield zenith delay model and related mapping functions, the Saastamoinen zenith delay model and mapping function, and three empirical mapping functions based upon the Marini continued fraction form. Modelled delays are benchmarked against ray-tracing solutions for representative atmospheric profiles at various latitudes and seasons. Numerical results are presented in light of the approximations inherent in model formulation. The effect of approximations to the temperature, pressure and humidity structure of the neutral atmosphere are considered; the impact of surface layer anomalies (i.e., inversions) on prediction accuracy is examined; and errors resulting from the neglect of ray bending are illustrated. The influence of surface meteorological parameter measurement error is examined. Finally, model adaptability to local conditions is considered. Recommendations concerning the suitability of the models for GPS relative positioning and their optimal application are made based upon the results presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bean, B. R., B. A. Cahoon, C. A. Samson, & G. D. Thayer (1966). “A world atlas of atmospheric radio refractivity.” Environmental Sciences Services Administration, Monograph 1, US Dept. of Commerce, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, A. L. (1976). “The prediction of zenith range refraction from surface measurements of meteorological parameters.” JPL Technical Report 32-1602, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beutler, G., I. Bauersima, W. Gurtner, M. Rothacher, T. Schildknecht & A. Geiger (1988). “Atmospheric refraction and other important biases in GPS carrier phase observations.” Atmospheric Effects on Geodetic Space Measurements, Monograph 12, School of Surveying, University of New South Wales, pp. 15–43.

  • Black, H. D. (1978). “An easily implemented algorithm for tropospheric range correction.”Journal of Geophysical Research, 38(B4), pp. 1825–1828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, H. D. & A. Eisner (1984). “Correcting satellite doppler data for tropospheric effects.”Journal of Geophysical Research, 89(D2), pp. 2616–2626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, C. C. (1972). “A model for tropospheric calibration from daily surface and radiosonde balloon measurements.” JPL Technical Memorandum 391-350, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, C. C. (1972A). “A new method to predict wet zenith range correction from surface measurements.” JPL Technical Report 32-1526, Vol. XIV, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., pp. 33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, A. E. & A. J. Kantor (1978). “Air force reference atmospheres.” US AFGL Technical Report 78-0051, Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, Hanscomb AFB, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. L. (1986). “Atmospheric propagation effects on radio interferometry.” AFGL Technical Report 86-0243, US Air Force Geophysical Laboratory, Hanscom AFB, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goad, C. C. & L. Goodman (1974). “A modified Hopfield tropospheric refraction correction model.” Presented Paper, AGU Annual Fall Meeting, San Francisco, Calif.

  • Hopfield, H. S. (1972). “Tropospheric range error parameters: further studies.” Applied Physics Laboratory Technical Memorandum TG1291, Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janes, H. W., R. B. Langley, & S. P. Newby (1989). “A comparison of several models for the prediction of tropospheric propagation delay.” Proceedings of the 5th International Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Positioning, Las Cruces, N.M., pp. 777–788.

  • Marini, J. W. (1972). “Correction of satellite tracking data for an arbitrary tropospheric profile.”Radio Science, 7(2), pp. 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (1966). “US Standard Atmosphere Supplements, 1966.” NTIS AD 659 543, National Technical Information Service, US Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, Va.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA (1976). “US Standard Atmosphere, 1976.” NOAA — S/T76 — 1562, NTIS ADA 035 728, National Technical Information Service, US Dept. of Commerce, Springfield, Va.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saastamoinen, J. (1973). “Contributions to the theory of atmospheric refraction.”Bulletin Geodesique, V105-107, pp. 279–298, 383-297, 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. L. (1966). “Note on the relationship between total precipitable water and surface dew point.”Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 5, pp. 726–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yionoulis, S. M. (1970). “Algorithm to compute refraction effects on range measurements.”Journal of Geophysical Research, 75(36), pp. 7636–7637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janes, H.W., Langley, R.B. & Newby, S.P. Analysis of tropospheric delay prediction models: comparisons with ray-tracing and implications for GPS relative positioning. Bulletin Géodésique 65, 151–161 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00806344

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00806344

Keywords

Navigation