Abstract
The jointness efficiency of large jurisdictions and the distributional efficiency of small jurisdictions present a dilemma in the organization of a governmental system. Working from the point of view that governments exist to provide services, the two types of efficiency are integrated through Lagrangian methodology. The result is an optimal provision of public goods, an equitable taxing structure, and an efficient distribution system.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bowen, H. R., “The Interpretation of Voting in the Allocation of Economic Resources,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, November, 1943.
Feldstein, M. S., “Distributional Equity and the Optimal Structure of Public Prices,”American Economic Review, Vol. LXII, 1972, pp. 32–36.
Foley, Ducan K., “Resource Allocation and the Public Sector,”Yale Economic Essays, Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 1967.
Honey, Rex, “Conflicting Problems in the Political Organization of Space,”Annals of Regional Science, March, 1976.
Kneese, A. V.,The Economics of Regional Water Quality Management, Baltimore, 1964.
Lindahl, E., 1919, “Just Taxation--A Positive Solution,” in R. A. Musgrave and A. T. Peacock, eds.,Classics in the Theory of Public Finance, London, MacMillan, 1958.
Musgrave, R. A.,The Theory of Public Finance, New York, McGraw-Hill, 1959.
Samuelson, P.A., “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure,”Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 36, pp. 387–389.
Teitz, Michael B., “Toward a Theory of Urban Public Facility Location,”Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. XXI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Honey, R., Strathman, J. Jurisdictional consequences of optimizing public goods. Ann Reg Sci 12, 32–40 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01286108
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01286108