Skip to main content
Log in

Improving efficiency of breeding for higher crop yield

  • Published:
Theoretical and Applied Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Exclusive selection for yield raises, the harvest index of self-pollinated crops with little or no gain in total bipmass. In addition to selection for yield, it is suggested that efficient breeding for higher yield requires simultaneous selection for yield's three major, genetically controlled physiological components. The following are needed: (1) a superior rate of biomass accumulation. (2) a superior rate of actual yield accumulation in order to acquire a high harvest index, and (3) a time to harvest maturity that is neither shorter nor longer than the duration of the growing season. That duration is provided by the environment, which is the fourth major determinant of yield. Simultaneous selection is required because genetically established interconnections among the three major physiological components cause: (a) a correlation between the harvest index and days to maturity that is usually negative; (b) a correlation between the harvest index and total biomass that is often negative, and (c) a correlation between biomass and days to maturity that is usually positive. All three physiological components and the correlations among them can be quantified by yield system analysis (YSA) of yield trials. An additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) statistical analysis can separate and quantify the genotype × environment interaction (G × E) effect on yield and on each physiological component that is caused by each genotype and by the different environment of each yield trial. The use of yield trials to select parents which have the highest rates of accumulation of both biomass and yield, in addition to selecting for the G × E that is specifically adapted to the site can accelerate advance toward the highest potential yield at each geographical site. Higher yield for many sites will raise average regional yield. Higher yield for multiple regions and continents will raise average yield on a world-wide basis. Genetic and physiological bases for lack of indirect selection for biomass from exclusive selection for yield are explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson JR, Hazell PBR (eds) (1989) Variability in grain yields: implications for agricultural research and policy in developing countries. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apel P (1984) Photosynthesis and assimilate partitioning in relation to plant breeding In: Vose PB, Blixt SG (eds) Crop breeding: a contemporary basis. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 163–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin RB (1990) Prospects for genetically increasing the photosynthetic capacity of crops. In: Zelitch I, Allen NS (eds) Perspective in biochemical and genetic regulation of photosynthesis. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 395–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernier G (1988) The control of floral evocation and morphogenesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 39:175–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Black CC, Burris RH (eds) (1975) CO2 Metabolism and plant productivity. University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Blixt S, Vose PB (1984) Breeding towards an ideotype — aiming at a moving target. In: Vose PB, Blixt SG (eds) Crop breeding: a contemporary basis. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 414–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum A, Golan G, Mayer J (1991) Progress achieved by breeding open-pollinated cultivars as compared with landraces of sorghum. J Agric Sci 117:307–312

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charles-Edwards DA, Vanderlip RL (1985) interfacing the analysis and synthesis of crop growth performance. In: Day W, Atkin RL (eds) Wheat growth and modeling. Plenum Press, New York, pp 275–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper RL (1988) Breeding for yield in soybeans: early generation testing and specific adaptation to high versus low yield environments. Presented at a workshop of Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia

  • Craufurd PQ, Bidinger FR (1988) Effect of the duration of the vegetative phase on shoot growth, development and yield in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum (L.) Leeke). J Exp Bot 39:124–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossa J (1990) Statistical analysis of multilocation trials. Adv Agron 44:55–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald CM (1968) The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17:385–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormling I, Gustafsson A, Ekman G (1975) Growth disorders and phenotype variability in phytotron-cultivated barley. Hereditas 79:255–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans LT (1983) Raising the yield potential: by selection or by design. In: Kosuge T, Meredith CP, Hollaender A (eds) Genetic engineering of plants. Plenum Press, New York, pp 371–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel OH (1947) The theory of plant breeding for yield. Heredity 1:109–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey KF (1988) Increasing grain yield of oats. Plant Physiol Biochem 26:539–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG Jr (1988) Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44:705–715

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG Jr (1992) Statistical analysis of regional yield trials. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford RM (1986) Partitioning of photosynthate in the development of crop yield. In: Cronshaw J, Lucas WJ, Gianquinta RT (eds) Phloem transport. AR Liss, New York, pp 535–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford RM (1987) Barriers to increasing crop productivity by genetic improvement of crop yield in photosynthesis. In: Biggins J (ed) Progress in photosynthesis. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, vol. IV, pp 377–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Gniffke PA (1985) Studies of phenological variation in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as modulated by mean temperature and photoperiod. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez H (1991) Early generation selection of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under wide environmental variation. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JE, Schrader LE, Howell RW (1985) Exploitation of physiological and genetic variability to enhance crop productivity. Am Soc Plant Physiol, Rockville Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi K (1969) Efficiencies of solar energy conversion in rice varieties as affected by cultivating period. Crop Sci Soc Jpn 38:528–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges T (1991) Predicting crop phenology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogendoorn J (1985) The physiology of variation in the time of ear emergence among wheat varieties from different regions of the world. Euphytica 34:559–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan DB, Ogren WL (1983) Species variation in kinetic properties of ribulose 1,5-bisphospate carboxylase-oxygenase. Arch Biochem Biophys 227:425–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang MS (1990) Understanding and utilization of genotypeby-environment in plant breeding. In: Kang MS (ed) Genotype by environment interaction and plant breeding. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La., pp 126–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JD, Adams MW (1987) Phenotypic recurrent selection in ideotype breeding of pinto beans. Euphytica 36:69–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy WJ, Brim CA (1979) Recurrent selection in soybeans. I. Seed yield. Crop Sci 19:315–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinet JM, Sachs RM, Bernier G (1985) The physiology of flowering, vol. III. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H, Cambridge ML, Konings H, Pons TL (1990) Causes and consequences of variations in growth rate and productivity of higher plants. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawn RR (1990) Agronomic and physiological constraints to the productivity of tropical grain legumes and prospects for improvement. Exp Agric 25:509–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon JD (1990) Photosynthesis and crop productivity. In: Zelitch I, Allen NS (eds) Perspectives in biochemical and genetic regulation of photosynthesis. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 379–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Masaya PN, White JF (1991) Adaptation to photoperiod and temperature. In: van Schoonhoven A, Voysest O (eds) Common beans: research for crop improvement. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 445–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo O (1987) The theory of plant breeding, 2nd edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers JR (1988) Thirty-nineth Annual Report of the Cooperative Dry Bean Nurseries. University of Idaho, Kimberly, Idaho

    Google Scholar 

  • Murfet IC (1977) Environmental interaction and the genetics of flowering. Annu Rev Plant Physiology 28:253–278

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusson DC (1987) An evaluation of ideotype breeding. Crop Sci 27:1140–1146

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson LD, Frey KJ (1987) Honeycomb design for selection among homozygous oat lines. Crop Sci 27:1105–1108

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross JJ, Murfet IC (1985) A comparison of the flowering and branching control systems in Lathyrus odoratus L and Pisum sativum L. Ann Bot 56:847–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell RS (1977) Plant root systems: their function and interaction with the soil. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury FB, Ross CW (1991) Plant physiology, 4th edn. Wadsworth Publ, Belmont, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully BT, Wallace DH (1990) Variation in and relationship of biomass, growth rate, harvest index, and phenology to yield of common bean. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 115:218–225

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scully BT, Wallace DH (1991) Heritability and correlation of biomass, growth rates, harvest index, and phenology to the yield of common beans. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 116:127–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedgley RH (1991) An assessment of the Donald ideotype after 21 years. Field Crops Res 26:93–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds NW (1989) How frequent are superior genotypes in plant breeding populations. Biol Rev 64:341–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Cajiao C, Gutierrez JA, Garcia J, Pastor-Coralles MA, Morales FJ (1989) Selection for seed yield in inter-gene pool crosses of common bean. Crop Sci 29:1126–1131

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SP, Lepiz R, Gutierrez JA, Urrea C, Molina A, Teran H (1990) Yield testing of early generation populations of common bean. Crop Sci 30:874–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith ML, Francis CA (1986). Breeding for multiple cropping systems. In: Francis CA (ed) Multiple cropping systems. Macmillan Publ, London, pp 219–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder FW, Carlson GE (1984) Selecting for partitioning of photosynthetic products in crops. Adv Agron 36:47–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Squire GR (1990) The physiology of tropical crop production. Bookcraft, Bath, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfield RD, Roberts EH (1988) Photo-thermal regulation of flowering in pea, lentil, faba bean and chickpea. In: World crops: cool season legumes. Kluwer Academic Publ, Norwell, Mass., pp 911–922

    Google Scholar 

  • Syme JR (1973) Quantitative control of flowering time in wheat cultivars by vernalization and photoperiod sensitivities. Aust J Agric Res 24:657–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda K, Frey KJ (1987) Improving grain yield in backcross populations from Avena sativa × A. sterilis matings by using independent culling for harvest index and vegetative growth index or unit straw weight. Theor Appl Genet 74:659–665

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollenaar M (1991) Physiological basis of genetic improvement of maize hybrids in Ontario from 1959 to 1988. Crop Sci 31:119–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollenaar M, Hunter RB (1983) A photoperiod and temperature sensitive period for leaf number of maize. Crop Sci 23:457–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Torigoe Y (1986) A conceptual model of developmental phases of maize on the basis of the relationship between differentiation and growth of vegetative and reproductive organs. Jpn J Crop Sci 55:465–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince-Prue D (1975) Photoperiodism in plants. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vince-Prue D, Thomas B, Cockshull KE (eds) (1984) Light and the flowering process. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH (1973) Commentry upon: Plant architecture and physiological efficiency in the field bean. In: Seminar on potentials of field beans and other food legumes in Latin America. Series Seminar No. 2E. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH (1980) The genetics of photosynthesis and crop productivity with emphasis on beans. In: (eds) Well-being of mankind and genetics vol. 1 book 2. Proc XIV Int Congr Genet. MIR Publ, Moscow, pp 306–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH (1985) Physiological-genetics of plant maturity, adaptation and yield. Plant Breeding Reviews 3:21–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH (1991) System analysis of yield trials can raise efficiency of breeding for yield. In: Prakash J, Peirik RLM (eds) Proc Int Seminar New Frontiers Hortic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH, Enriquez GA (1980) Daylength and temperature effects on days to flowering of early and late maturing beans (Phaseolus vulgaris. L). J Am Soc Hortic Sci:105–583–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH, Masaya PN (1988) Using yield trial data to analyze the physiological genetics of yield accumulation and the genotype × environment interaction effect on yield. Annu Rep Bean Improvement Coop 31:vii-xxiv

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH, Zobel RW (1982) The biology of crop yield. In: Rechcigl M Jr (ed) Handbook of crop productivity. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH, Peet MM, Ozbun JL (1976) Studies of CO2 metabolism in Phaseolus vulgaris L. and applications in breeding. In: Burris RH, Black CC (eds) CO2 metabolism and plant productivity. University Press, Baltimore, pp 43–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH, Gniffke PA, Masaya PN, Zobel RW (1991) Photoperiod, temperature and genotype interaction effects on days and node to flower of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Am Soc Hortic Sci 116:534–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH, Yourstone KS, Masaya PN, Zobel RW (1993a) Photoperiod gene control over partitioning between reproductive and vegetative growth. Theor Appl Genet 86:6–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace DH, Zobel RW, Yourstone KS (1993c) A whole-system reconsideration of paradigms about photoperiod and temperature control of crop yield. Theor Appl Genet 86:17–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw IF (1990) The review of carbon partitioning in plants. New Phytol 116:341–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner BK, Wilcox JR (1990) Recurrent selection for yield in Glycine max using male sterility. Euphytica 50:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Whisler FD, Acock B, Baker DN, Fye RE, Hodges HF, Lambert JR, Lemmon HE, McKinion JM, Reddy VR (1986) Crop simulation models in agronomic systems. Adv Agron 40:141–208

    Google Scholar 

  • White JW, Izquierdo J (1989) Dry bean: physiology of yield potential and stress tolerance. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia, and FAO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago, Chile

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf S, Marani A, Rudich J (1990) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on assimilate partitioning in potato. Ann Bot 66:513–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yourstone KS (1988) Photoperiod and temperature interaction effects on time to flower and its components in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yourstone KS, Wallace DH (1990) Effects of photoperiod and temperature on rate of node development in indeterminate bean. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 115:824–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelitch I (1971) Photosynthesis, photorespiration and plant productivity. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobel RW (1990) A powerful statistical model for understanding genotype-by environment interaction. In: Kang MS (ed) Genotype by environment interaction and plant breeding. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La., pp 126–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobel RW, Wright MJ, Gauch HG (1988) Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron J 80:388–393

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by A. R. Hallauer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallace, D.H., Baudoin, J.P., Beaver, J. et al. Improving efficiency of breeding for higher crop yield. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 86, 27–40 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223805

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223805

Key words

Navigation