Summary
A theoretical comparison between two multiple-trait selection methods, index and tandem selection, after several generations of selection was carried out. An infinite number of loci determining the traits, directional and truncation selection, discrete generations and infinite population size were assumed. Under these assumptions, changes in genetic parameters over generations are due to linkage disequilibrium generated by selection. Changes continue for several generations until equilibrium is approached. Algebraic expressions for asymptotic responses from index selection can be derived if index weights are maintained constant across generations. Expressions at equilibrium for genetic parameters and responses are given for the index and its component traits. The loss in response by using initial index weights throughout all generations, instead of updating them to account for changes in genetic parameters, was analyzed. The benefit of using optimum weights was very small ranging from 0% to about 1.5% for all cases studied. Recurrence formulae to predict genetic parameters and responses at each generation of selection are given for both index and tandem selection. A comparison between expected response in the aggregate genotype at equilibrium from index and tandem selection is made considering two traits of economic importance. The results indicate that although index selection is more efficient for improving the aggregate breeding value, its relative efficiency with respect to tandem selection decreases after repeated cycles of selection. The reduction in relative efficiency is highest with the highest selection intensity and heritabilities and with negative correlations between the two traits. The advantage of index over tandem selection might be further reduced if changes in genetic parameters due to gene frequency changes produced by selection, random fluctuations due to the finite size of the population, and errors in estimation of parameters, were also considered.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennet GL, Swiger LA (1980) Genetic variance and correlation after selection for two traits by index, independent culling levels and extreme selection. Genetics 94:763–775
Bulmer MG (1971) The effect of selection on genetic variability. Am Nat 105:201–211
Blumer MG (1980) The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Caballero A (1989) Efficiency in prediction of response in selection index experiments. J Anim Breed Genet 106:187–194
Dekkers JCM (1990) Reduction of response to selection due to linkage disequilibrium with selection on best linear unbiased predictors. In: Hill WG, Thompson R, Woolliams JA (eds) Proc 4th Wrld Congr Genet Appl Livestock Prod, Edinburgh, vol 13, 277–280
Finney DJ (1962) Genetic gains under three methods of selection. Genet Res 3:417–423
Gomez-Raya L, Burnside EB (1990a) Optimum selection indices for continuous selection programmes. In: Hill WG, Thompson R, Woolliams JA (eds) Proc 4th Wrld Congr Genet Appl Livestock Prod, Edinburgh, vol 13, 273–276
Gomez-Raya L, Burnside EB (1990 b) The effect of repeated cycles of selection on genetic variance, heritability, and response. Theor Appl Genet 79:568–574
Harris DL (1964) Expected and predicted progress from index selection involving estimates of population parameters. Biometrics 20:46–72
Hayes JF, Hill WG (1980) A reparametrization of a genetic selection index to locate its sampling properties. Biometrics 36:237–248
Hazel LN, Lush JL (1942) The efficiency of three methods of selection. J Hered 33:393–399
Hill WG, Meyer K (1984) Effects of errors in parameter estimates on efficiency of restricted genetic selection indices. In: Hinkelmann K (ed) Experimental design, statistical models, and genetic statistics. Essays in honor of O. Kempthorne. Marcel Decker, New York, pp 345–367
Hill WG, Thompson R (1978) Probabilities of non-positive definite between-group or genetic covariance matrices. Biometrics 34:429–439
James JW (1982) Construction, uses, and problems of multitrait selection indices. In: Proc 2nd Wrld Congr Genet Appl Livestock Prod Madrid, vol 5, pp 130–139
Lin CY (1978) Index selection for genetic improvement of quantitative characters. Theor Appl Genet 52:49–56
Lin CY, Allaire FR (1977) Heritability of a linear combination of traits. Theor Appl Genet 51:1–3
Nordskog AW (1978) Some statistical properties of an index of multiple traits. Theor Appl Genet 52:91–94
Pearson K (1903) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. XI. On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 200:l-66
Sales J, Hill WG (1976) Effect of sampling errors on efficiency of selection indices. 2. Use of information on associated traits for improvement of a single important trait. Anim Prod 23:1–14
Sen BK, Robertson A (1964) An experimental examination of methods for the simultaneous selection of two characters, using Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 50:199–209
Tallis GM (1960) The sampling errors of estimated genetic regression coefficients and the errors of predicted gains. Aus J Stat 2:66–77
Villanueva B, Kennedy BW (1990) Effect of selection on genetic parameters of correlated traits. Theor Appl Genet 80:746–752
Villanueva B, Kennedy BW (1991) Efficiency of indirect selection at selection equilibrium. Theor Appl Genet 81:166–172
Williams JS (1962a) Some statistical properties of a genetic selection index. Biometrika 49:325–337
Williams JS (1962 b) The evaluation of a selection index. Biometrics 18:375–393
Wray NR, Hill WG (1989) Asymptotic rates of response from index selection. Anim Prod 49:217–227
Young SSY (1961) A further examination of the relative efficiency of three methods of selection for genetic gains under less-restricted conditions. Genet Res 2:106–121
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by L.D. Van Vleck
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Villanueva, B., Kennedy, B.W. Index versus tandem selection after repeated generations of selection. Theoret. Appl. Genetics 85, 706–712 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225009
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00225009