Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die Herstellung von neuen Allopolyploiden für die Züchtung

  • Published:
Der Züchter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Becker, G.: Darwin und die Pflanzenzüchtung. Ber. u. Vortr. Dtsch. Akad. Landwirtsch. Wiss. Berlin4, 99–113 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, G.: Reittich und Radies (Raphanus sativus L.). Handb. Pflanzenz. 2. Aufl.6, 23–78 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bender, K.: Über die Erzeugung und Entstehung dihaploider Pflanzen beiSolanum tuberosum. Z. Pflanzenz.50, 141–166 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benett, H. W., andE. C. Bashaw: An interspecific hybrid inPaspalum. J. Hered.51, 81–85 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borrill, M.: Experimental studies of evolution inAnthoxanthum. Genetica34, 183–210 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buxton, B. H., andW. C. F. Newton: Hybrids ofDigitalis ambigua andDigitalis purpurea, their fertility and cytology. J. Genet.19, 269–279 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clausen, R. E., andT. H. Goodspeed: Interspecific hybridization inNicotiana. II. A tetraploidglutinosa-tabacum hybrid, an experimental verification ofWinge's hypothesis. Genetics10, 278–284 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clausen, J., D. D. Keck andW. M. Hiesey: Experimental studies on the nature of species. II. Plant evolution through amphiploidy and antoploidy with examples from the Madiinae. Carnegie Inst. Washington Publ.564, 1–174 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Collins, G. N., andA. E. Longley: A tetraploid hybrid of maize and perennial teosinte. J. agric. Res.50, 123–133 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crane, M. B., andC. D. Darlington: The origin of new forms inRubus I. Genetica9, 241–277 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Darlington, C. D., andK. Mather: The elements of genetics. 446 S. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D'Cruz, R., andK. Chakravarty: Spontaneous allopolyploidy inArachis. Indian Oilseeds J.5, 55–57 (1961); Ref. in: Plant Breed. Abstr.31, 5357 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eghis, S. A.: Experiments on interspecific hybridization in the genusNicotiana. I. Hybridization between the speciesN. rustica L., andN. tabacum L. Bull. Appl. Bot.17, 151–189 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Elvers, I.: Interspecific hybridization inNicotiana. XIV. The cytology of F1 glutinosa×tomentosa. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.17, 341–353 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Emerson, R. A., andG. W. Beadle: A fertile tetraploid hybrid betweenEuchlaena perennis andZea mays. Amer. Nat.64, 190–193 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Emme E. K.: Triploide Bastarde der gegenPhytophthora festen Arten vonSolanum Antipoviczii Buk. sp. coll. (russ.) Biol. Z.5, 901–914 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Endlich, J., undH. Murawski: Bertrage zur Züchtungsforschung an Pflaumen. III. Untersuchungen an Artbastarden vonPrunus spinosa L.×Prunus cerasifera Ehrh. und die Frage der Entstehung vonPrunus domestica L. Züchter32, 121–133 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frandsen, K. J.: Beiträge zur Cytogenetik derBrassica napus L., derBrassica campestris L. und deren Bastarden, sowie der amphidiploideBrassica napocampestris. K. Veter.-og Landbohøjsk. Aarskr. 1941, 59–90 (1941).

  19. Frandsen, H. N., andÖ. Winge:Brassica napocampestris, a new constant amphidiploid species hybrid. Hereditas16, 212–218 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goffart, H., u.H. Ross: Untersuchungen zur Frage der Resistenz von Wildarten der Kartoffel gegen den Kartoffelnematoden (Heterodera rostochiensis Wr.). Züchter24, 193–201 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grant, V.: Cytogenetics of the hybridGilia millefoliata×achilleaefolia. I. Variations in meiosis and polyploidy rate as affected by nutritional and genetic conditions. Chromosoma5, 372–390 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gregor, J. W., andF. W. Sansome: Experiments on the genetics of wild populations. II.Phleum pratense L. and the hybridP. pratense L.×P. alpinum L. J. Genet.22, 373–387 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Haritonova, E. N.: The question of restoration of fertility in sour×sweet cherry hybrids (Cerasus vulgaris Mill,×C. avium Moench) and the hybrid origin of sour cherry (C. vulgaris Mill.)].

  24. : Polyploidy in plants. Transactions of the conference 0 on plant polyploidy, 25–28 June 1958. Trud. moskov. Obšč. Ispyt. Prirod.5, 303–312 (1962); Ref. in: Plant Breed. Abstr.33, 4212 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Haskell, G.: Analyses of sexual-apomictic blackberry populations and their ecological consequences. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. on quant. Biol.20, 111–126 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hirayoshi, I., K. Nishikawa andA. Hakura: Cytogenetical studies on forage plants. VIII. On 3x and 4x hybrids fromMiscanthus sinensis var.condensatus×M. sacchariflorus (jap.). Gifu-Daigabu Nogakubu Kenkyu Hokoku/Res. Bull. Fac. Agric. Gifu Univ.12, 82–88 (1960); Ref. in: Plant Breed. Abstr.31, 4818 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hollingshead, L.: Cytological investigations of hybrids and hybrid derivatives ofCrepis capillaris andCrepis tectorum. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agric. Sci.6, 55–94 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ichijima, K.: Cytological and genetic studies onFragaria. Genetics11, 590–604 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ivanov, V. I.: Formation of polyploid forms inSolanum, sect.Tuberarium. C. R. Acad. Sci. URSS24, 486–488 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ivanovskaja, E. V.: Cytological analysis of hybrids between diploid and tetraploid species of potatoes (russ.). Bull. Acad. Sci. URSS, Ser. Biol.1, 21–33 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jahr, W.: Befruchtungsbiologie und Allopolyploidie bei der Artkreuzung Sommerraps×Chinakohl (Brassica napus f.typica Pospichal×B. pekinensis Rupr. var.cylindrica Tsen et Lee). Züchter32, 216–225 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jahr, W., K. Skiebe u.M. Stein: Bedeutung von Valenzkreuzungen für die Polyploidiezüchtung. Z. Pflanzenz.50, 26–33 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jenkin, T. J., andP. T. Thomas: Interspecific and intergeneric hybrids in herbage grasses. III.Lolium loliaceum andLolium rigidum. J. Genet.37, 255–286 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jones, K., andM. Borrill: Chromosomal status, gene exchange and evolution inDactylis. Genetica32, 296–322 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jones, H. A., andA. E. Clarke: A natural amphidiploid from an onion species hybridAllium cepa L.×Allium fistulosum L. J. Hered.33, 25–32 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Karpechenko, G. D.: Polyploid hybrids ofRaphanus sativus L.×Brassica oleracea L. Z. ind. Abst. u. Vererbl.48, 1–85 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kihara, H.: Genomanalyse beiTriticum undAegilops. VII. Kurze Übersicht über die Ergebnisse der Jahre 1934–1936. Mem. Coll. Agric. Kyoto Imp. Univ.41, 1–61 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kihara, H., undY. Katayama: Genomanalyse beiTriticum undAegilops. III. Zur Entstehungsweise eines neuen konstanten oktoploiden Aegilotricum. Cytologia2, 234–255 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Koopmans, A., andA. H. van der Burg: Chromosome number and chromosome behaviour of F1 and F2 plants of the crossSolanum phureja×Solanum tuberosum. Genetica26, 102–116 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Larsen, C. S., andM. Westergaard: Contributions to the cytogenetics of forest trees: I. A. triploid hybrid betweenLarix decidua Miller andLarix occidentalis Nutt. J. Genet.36, 523–530 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ledingham, G. F.: Cytological and developmental studies of hybrids betweenMedicago sativa and a diploid form ofM. falcata. Genetics25, 1–15 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Levan, A.: The cytology of the species hybridAllium cepa×fistulosum and its polyploid derivatives. Hereditas27, 253–272 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Li, H. W., C. C. Chen, T. S. Weng andK. D. Wuu: Cytogenetical studies ofOryza sativa L. and its related species, 4. Interspecific crosses involvingO. australiensis withO. sativa andO. minuta. Bot. Bull. Acad. sin.4, 65–74 (1963); Ref. in: Plant Breed. Abstr.34, 4160 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Marsden-Jones, E. M., andW. B. Turrill: The history of a tetraploid saxifrage. J. Genet.23, 83–92 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Menzel, M. Y., andF. D. Wilson: An allododecaploid hybrid ofHibiscus diversifolius and some related F1 hybrids. J. Hered.54, 55–60 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Morris, L. E., andR. H. Richharia: A triploid radish×turnip hybrid and some of its progeny. J. Genet.34, 275–286 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Müntzing, A.: Über die Entstehungsweise 56-chromosomiger Weizen-Roggen-Bastarde. Züchter8, 188–191 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nakajima, G.: Karyogenetical studies on the intergeneric F1-hybrids raised betweenTriticum turgidum andHaynaldia hordeacea. Cytologia25, 208–213 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Nakajima, G.: Cytogenetical studies of intergeneric hybrids betweenHaynaldia andSecale. IV. External characters and meiosis in the pollen mother cells of F2 plants ofS. fragile×H. villosa (jap.). Idengaku Zasshi/Jap. J. Genet.36, 129–136 (1961); Ref. in: Plant Breed. Abstr.32, 3219 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Oehler, E.: Untersuchungen an drei neuen konstanten additivenAegilops-Weizenbastarden. Züchter6, 263–270 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Oehler, E.: Art- und Gattungskreuzung. Handb. Pflanzenz.1 563–611 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Olah, L.: Interspecific hybrids in the genusPhleum. Proc. 7th Int. Genet. Congr. Edinburgh, 167–168 (1940).

  53. Oldén, E. J.: Hybridiseringsförsök inom plommongruppen. Sver. Pomol. Fören. Arsskr. 1955, 155–174 (1956), zit. beiE. Johansson u.E. J. Oldén: Zwetschen, Pflaumen, Reineclauden, Mirabellen. Handb. Pflanzenz.6, 602–624 (1962).

  54. Olsson, G.: Species crosses within the genusBrassica. I. ArtificialBrassica juncea Coss. Hereditas46, 171–223 (1960a).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Olsson, G.: Species crosses within the genusBrassica. II. ArtificialBrassica napus L. Hereditas46, 351–386 (1960b).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Oppenheimer, H. C.: Cytogenetische Untersuchungen an Bastarden knollentragenderSolanum-Arten. I.Solanum chacoense Bitt.×Solanum tuberosum L. s. str. Z. ind. Abst. u. Vererbungsl.65, 72–98 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Percival, J.: Cytological studies of some hybrids ofAegilops sp.×wheats, and of some hybrids between different species ofAegilops. J. Genet.22, 201–278 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Perlova, R. L.: Production of an autohexaploidSolanum vallis-mexici Juz. by means of its cultivation in the Pamir. C. R. Acad. Sci. URSS.25, 419–422 (1939); zit. beiW. Rudorf et al.: Kartoffel. Handb. Pflanzenz.3, 1–195 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Poole, Ch. F.: The interspecific hybrid,Crepis rubra×C. foetida and some of its derivatives. II. Two selfed generations from an amphidiploid hybrid. Univ. Calif. Publ. Agric. Sci.6, 231–255 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Prakken, R., andM. S. Swaminathan: Cytological behaviour of some inter-specific hybrids in the genusSolanum, sect.Tuberarium. Genetica26, 77–101 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Propach, H.: Kreuzbarkeit vonSolanum-Arten untereinander und mit Kulturkartoffeln und die Fertilität der Bastarde. Forschungsdienst6, 311–314 (1938a).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Propach, H.: Cytogenetische Untersuchungen in der GattungSolanum, sect.Tuberarium. IV. Tetraploide und sesquidiploide Artbastande. Z. ind. Abst. u. Vererbungsl.74, 376–387 (1938b).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Puskarev, I. I.: The new blight resistant potato variety 8670 (russ). Novoe u Sel'skom Khozjaiste Sel'khozjiz, Moscow, No. 6, pp. 46 (1937); zit. beiW. Rudorf et. al.: Kartoffeln. Handb. Pflanzenz.,3, 1–195 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Richharia, R. H.: Cytological investigation ofRaphanus sativus, Brassica oleracea, and their F1 and F2 hybrids. J. Genet.34, 19–44 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Rozanova, M. A.: On polymorphic type of species origin. C. R. Acad. Sci. URSS.18, 677–680 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rozanova, M. A.: Variation in the processes of form development in some species of the genusRubus. Aus: Questions of evolution, biogeography, genetics and plant breeding (russ.). Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moskva-Leningrad, 210–216 (1960); Ref.: Plant. Breed. Abstr.32, 3008 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Rudorf, W.: Über die Erzeugung und die Eigenschaften synthetischer Rapsformen. Z. Pflanzenz.29, 35–54 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Rybin, V. A.: Polyploid hybrids ofNicotiana Tabacum L.×Nicotiana rustica L. Bull. appl. Bot. Genet. and Plant Breed.17, 191–240 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Rybin, W. A.: Spontane und experimentell erzeugte Bastarde zwischen Schwarzdorn und Kirschpflaume und das Abstammungsproblem der Kulturpflaume. Planta25, 22–58 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Singleton, W. R.: Cytogenetic behavior of fertile tetraploid hybrids ofNicotiana rustica andNicotiana paniculata. Genetics17, 510–544 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Skalinska, M.: Cytological mechanism of segregation in the progeny of an allotetraploidAquilegia. Proc. 6th Int. Congr. Genet.2, 185–187 (1932).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Skiebe, K.: Artbastardierung und Polyploidie in der GattungCheiranthus L. Züchter26, 353–363 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Skiebe, K.: Die Bedeutung von unreduzierten Gameten für die Polyploidiezüchtung bei der Fliederprimel (Primula malacoides Franchet). Züchter28, 353–359 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Stelzner, G.: Wege zur züchterischen Nutzung desSolanum chacoense Bitt. in Hinblick auf die Züchtung käferresistenter Kartoffelsorten. Züchter15, 33–38 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Storey, W. B.: Diploid and polyploid gamete formation in orchids. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.68, 491–502 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Straub, J.: Polyploidieauslösung durch Temperaturwirkungen. Z. Bot.34, 385–481 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ternovsky, M. F.: Erscheinungen der Polyploidie bei Artenbastarden vonNicotiana. Z. Pflanzenz.20, 268–289 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Thompson, R. C.: An amphidiploidLactuca, produced by nonreduction in F1-hybrids. J. Hered.33, 253–264 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Tischler, G.: Das Problem der Basis-Chromosomenzahlen bei den Angiospermen-Gattungen und-Familien. Cytologia19, 1–10 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  80. U.N.: Genome-analysis inBrassica with special reference to the experimental formation ofB. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Jap. J. Bot.7, 389–452 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  81. U. N., U. Midusima andK. Saito: On diploid and triploidBrassica-Raphanus hybrids. Cytologia8, 319–326 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Veihmeyer, F. J.: Soil moisture. Handb. Pflanzenphysiol.3, 64–123 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wangenheim, K. H. v.: Zur Ursache der Kreuzungsschwierigkeiten zwischenSolanum tuberosum L. undS. acaule Bitt. bzw.S. stoloniferum Schlechtd. et Bouché. Z. Pflanzenz.34, 7–48 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Whitaker, Th. W.: The occurrence of a spontaneous triploid celery. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.39, 346–348 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Whittington, W. J., andJ. Hill: Growth studies on natural hybrids betweenLolium perenne andFestuca pratensis. J. exp. Bot.12, 330–340 (1961); Ref. in: Plant Breed. Abstr.31, 4807 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Pflanzenzüchtung Quedlinburg der Deutschen Akademie der Landwirtschaftswissenschaften zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    W. Jahr, K. Skiebe & M. Stein

Authors
  1. W. Jahr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Skiebe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Stein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Herrn Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c.Becker zum 60. Geburtstag.

Quedlinburger Beiträge zur Züchtungsforschung Nr. 65

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jahr, W., Skiebe, K. & Stein, M. Die Herstellung von neuen Allopolyploiden für die Züchtung. Der Züchter 35, 7–14 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705835

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705835

Search

Navigation