Skip to main content
Log in

A note on the optimality ofk-stage tests

  • Published:
Metrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This note deals with sequential tests requiring at mostk observations. First a lemma is proved concerning the form of Bayes solutions. Then it is demonstrated by giving a counter-example that the theorem ofWald andWolfowitz has no correspondence fork-stage tests.

Zusammenfassung

Es wird gezeigt, daß man beik-stufigen Tests zwar für die Gestalt vonBayes-Lösungen ein Analogon zu den unbeschränkten Sequenztests hat, daß aber der Satz vonWald undWolfowitz über die gleichmäßige Optimalität bzgl. des Stichprobenumfangs keine Entsprechung besitzt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Lehmann, E. L.: Testing Statistical Hypotheses. J. Wiley, New York 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthes, Th. K.: On the optimality of sequential probability ratio tests. Ann. Math. Stat.34, 1963, 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, H.: Optimale Sequenzwiederholungstests. Zeitschr. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Geb.5, 1966, 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmitz, N. A note on the optimality ofk-stage tests. Metrika 19, 72–75 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893280

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01893280

Keywords

Navigation