Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of female and male schooling on economic growth in the Barro-Lee model

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Barro and Lee (1994), in an influential empirical study of the determinants of economic growth, find that, whereas growth is positively related to male schooling, it is negatively related to female schooling. Stokey (1994) has suggested that this is largely due to the influence of four Asian countries (Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and Korea) that have very high levels of growth but very low levels of female schooling, and that deleting the female education variable would cast doubt on the statistical significance of the male education variable. Deletion diagnostics and partial scatter plots are analysed to identify influential observations. The sensitivity of the Barro-Lee results to deleting selected countries from the sample and deleting female education from their growth equations is then examined. The results obtained point to the fragile nature of both the significant negative effect of female education and the significant positive effect of male education in the Barro-Lee model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

First version received: September 1996/Final version received: December 1998

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorgelly, P., Owen, P. The effect of female and male schooling on economic growth in the Barro-Lee model. Empirical Economics 24, 537–557 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810050071

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001810050071

Navigation