Skip to main content
Log in

Two aspects of labor mobility: A bivariate Poisson regression approach

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The study introduces a distinction between two types of labor mobility. Direct job to job changes (which are assumed to be voluntary) and job changes after experiencing an unemployment spell (assumed to be involuntary). Exploiting the close relationship between those two phenomena we adopt a bivariate regression framework for our empirical analysis of data on male individuals in the German labor market. To account for the non-negative and discrete nature of the two counts of job changes in a ten year interval a new econometric model is proposed: the bivariate Poisson regression proves to be superior to the univariate specification. Further, the empirical content of distinguishing between two types of mobility is subject to a test, and, in fact, supported by the data: The hypothesis that both measures are observationally equivalent can be rejected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Börsch-Supan A (1990) Education and its double-edged impact on mobility.Economics-of-Education-Review 9(1):39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (1986) Econometric models based on count data: comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests.Journal of Applied Econometrics 1:29–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller, W (1968)An introduction to probability theory and its application Vol. I. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert CL (1979) Econometric models for discrete (integer valued) economic processes. In: EG Charatsis (ed.)Selected Papers on contemporary econometric problems. The Athens School of Economics and Business Science

  • Gourieroux C (1989)Econométrie des variables qualitatives. Paris: Economica

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux C, Monfort A, Trognon A (1984a) Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: Theory.Econometrica 52:681–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux C, Monfort A, Trognon A (1984b) Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: Applications to Poisson models.Econometrica 52:701–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NL, Kotz S (1969)Distributions in Statistics: Discrete Distributions. New York: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic B (1984) Matching, turnover, and unemployment.Journal of Political Economy 92(1): 108–122

    Google Scholar 

  • King G (1989) A seemingly unrelated Poisson regression model.Sociological Methods and Research

  • Kocherlakota S, Kocherlakota K (1992)Bivariate Discrete Distributions. New York: Marcel Dekker

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullagh P, Nelder J (1989)Generalized linear models. London: Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin KJ (1991) A theory of quits and layoffs with efficient turnover.Journal of Political Economy 99(1):1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer J, Jovanovic B (1981) Labor mobility and wages. In: S. Rosen (ed.)Studies in labor markets. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Topel RH, Ward MP (1992) Job mobility and the careers of young men.Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2):439–479

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Valuable comments by Gerd Ronning, Christoph M. Schmidt as well as the editor and two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jung, R.C., Winkelmann, R. Two aspects of labor mobility: A bivariate Poisson regression approach. Empirical Economics 18, 543–556 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01176203

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01176203

JEL Classification System-Numbers

Navigation