Abstract
The trunk road system in Norway has to be supplemented by a number of ferries due to the long coastline with numerous islands and fjords. Most of the ferries are run by private companies, but at a loss. The deficitś are covered by the Ministry of Transport. The subsidies have risen rapidly in the last years and have focussed attention on whether the ferries are really run as efficiently as possible. To change the incentives to economize, a lump-sum payment is considered. To implement such a system, an initial assessment of reasonable input requirements is needed. The aim of this article is to provide such a yardstick by establishing a best practice frontier. Both a non-parametric and a parametric approach to a deterministic frontier are tried and differences of results discussed. Peculiarities due to choice of methods are revealed. The efficiency distributions are quite similar for the two methods except for scale efficiency, where the parametric method indicates substantial unrealized scale economies, while the non-parametric approach shows the largest and some small ferries to be scale efficient. The results indicate a substantial rationalization potential of about 30 percent in total.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afriat, S.N. (1972). “Efficiency estimation of production functions.” International Economic Review 13, pp. 568–598.
Aigner, D.J. and S.F. Chu. (1968). “On estimating the industry production function.” American Economic Review 58, pp. 226–239.
Albriktsen, R.O. and F.R. Førsund. (1990). “A productivity study of the Norwegian building industry.” The Journal of Productivity Analysis 2, pp. 53–66.
Ali, A.I., (1989). “Computational aspects of data envelopment analysis.” Paper presented at a conference on New Uses of DEA in Management, Austin Texas.
Banker, R.D., R.F. Conrad, and R.P. Strauss. (1986). “A comparative application of data envelopment analysis and translog methods: An illustrative study of hospital production.” Management Science 32, pp. 30–44.
Banker, R.D., A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper, and A. Maindiratta. (1988). “A comparison of DEA and translog estimates of production frontiers using simulated observations from a known technology.” In A. Dogramaci and R. Färe (eds.), Applications of modern production theory: Efficiency and Productivity. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Banker, R.D., V.M. Gadh, and W.L. Gorr. (1990). “A Monte Carlo comparison of two production frontier estimation methods: Corrected ordinary least squares and Data Envelopment Analysis.” Paper presented at a conference of New Uses of DEA in Management, Austin, Texas.
Bjurek, H., L. Hjalmarsson, and F.R. Førsund. (1990). “Deterministic parametric and non parametric estimation of efficiency in service production. A comparison.” Journal of Econometrics 46, pp. 213–227.
Bös, D. (1988). “Recent theories on public enterprise economics.” European Economic Review 32, pp. 409–414.
Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2 (6), pp. 429–444.
Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and T. Sueyoshi. (1988). “A goal programming/constrained regression review of the Bell System breakup.” Management Science 34, pp. 1–26.
Deprins, D., L. Simar, and H. Tulkens. (1984). “Measuring Labor-Efficiency in Post Offices.” In M. Marchand, P. Pestieau, and H. Tulkens (eds.), The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concept and Measurement. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.
Farrell, M.J. (1957). “The measurement of productive efficiency.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120 (III), pp. 253–281.
Ferrier, G.D. and C.A.K. Lovell. (1990). “Measuring cost efficiency in banking: Econometric and linear programming evidence.” Journal of Econometrics 46, pp. 229–245.
Førsund, F.R. and E. Hernaes. (1990). “Ferry transport in Norway: An application of DEA analysis.” Working Paper No. 45, Centre for Applied Research, Department of Economics, University of Oslo.
Førsund, F.R. and L. Hjalmarsson. (1974). “On the measurement of productive efficiency.” Swedish Journal of Economics 76, pp. 141–154.
Førsund, F.R. and L. Hjalmarsson. (1979a). “Frontier production functions and technical progress: A study of general milk processing in Swedish dairy plants.” Econometrica 47, pp. 883–900.
Førsund, F.R. and L. Hjalmarsson. (1979b). “Generalized Farrell measures of efficiency: An application to milk processing in Swedish dairy plants.” Economic Journal 89, pp. 294–315.
Førsund, F.R. and L. Hjalmarsson. (1987). “Analyses of Industrial Structure: A putty-clay approach.” The Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Petersen, N.C. and O. Olesen. (1989). “Chance constrained efficiency evaluation.” Publications from Department of Management, No. 9, Odense University.
Sengupta, J.K. (1987). “Data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement in the stochastic case.” Computers and Operations Research 14, pp. 117–129.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I am indebted to three referees for forcing me to improve significantly the quality of the study. Any remaining shortcomings are, of course, my responsibility.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Førsund, F.R. A comparison of parametric and non-parametric efficiency measures: The case of Norwegian ferries. J Prod Anal 3, 25–43 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158767
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00158767