Skip to main content
Log in

Accounting for Environmental Influences in Stochastic Frontier Models: With Application to International Airlines

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The principal aim of this paper is to measure the efficiency of international airlines. We obtain measures of technical efficiency from stochastic frontier production functions which have been adjusted to account for environmental influences such as network conditions, geographical factors, etc. We observe that two alternative approaches to this problem have been proposed in the efficiency measurement literature. One assumes that the environmental factors influence the shape of the technology while the other assumes that they directly influence the degree of technical inefficiency. In this paper we compare the results obtained when using these two approaches. The two sets of results provide similar rankings of airlines but suggest differing degrees of technical inefficiency. Both sets of results also suggest that Asian/Oceanic airlines are technically more efficient than European and North American airlines but that the differences are essentially due to more favourable environmental conditions. Nevertheless, it is among Asian companies that the major improvements in managerial efficiency (technical efficiency with environmental factors netted out) took place over the sample period (1977–1990).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn, S. C., D. Good, and R. C. Sickles. (1997). “A Dynamic Frontier Approach to Assessing the Relative Efficiency of Asian and North American Airline Firms.” Paper presented at the Taipei International Conference on Efficiency and Productivity Growth, June 20–21, 1997.

  • Aigner, D. J., C. A. K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt. (1977). “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics 6, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H., J. M. Griffin, and D. P. Rich. (1995). “Airline Deregulation: The Cost Pieces of the Puzzle.” International Economic Review 36, 245–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barla, P., and S. Perelman. (1989). “Technical Efficiency in Airlines under Regulated and Deregulated Environments.” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 60, 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli. (1988). “Prediction of Firm-level Technical Efficiencies with a Generalised Frontier Production Function and Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 38, 387–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli. (1993). “A Stochastic Frontier Production Function Incorporating a Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects.” Working Papers in Econometrics and Applied Statistics No 69, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese, G. E., and T. J. Coelli. (1995). “A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data.” Empirical Economics 20, 325–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P.W. (1990). “Decomposing TFP Growth in the Presence of Cost Inefficiency, Nonconstant Returns to Scale, and Technological Progress.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 1, 287–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIE (Bureau of Industry Economics). (1994). International Performance Indicators. Aviation. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Captain, P. F., and R. C. Sickles. (1997). “Competition and Market Power in the European Airline Industry: 1976–1990.” Managerial and Decision Economics 18, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and M. W. Tretheway. (1981). “U.S. Trunk Air Airlines, 1972–1977: A Multilateral Comparison of Total Factor Productivity.” In T. G. Cowing and R. E. Stevenson (eds.), Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries. Academic Press, 47–77.

  • Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and E. Diewert. (1982). “Multilateral Comparisons of Output, Input, and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers.” The Economic Journal 92, 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and M. W. Tretheway. (1984). “Economies of Density versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Service Airline Costs Differ.” Rand Journal of Economics 15, 471–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T. J. (1992). “A Computer Program for Frontier Production Function Estimation.” Economic Letters 39, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T. J. (1994). “A Guide to Frontier Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation.” mimeo, Department of Econometrics, University of New England, Armidale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, C., P. Schmidt, and R. C. Sickles. (1990). “Production Frontiers with Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Variation in Efficiency Levels.” Journal of Econometrics 46(1/2), 185–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Distexhe, V., and S. Perelman. (1994). “Technical Efficiency and Productivity Growth in an Era of Deregulation: The Case of Airlines.” Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 130, 669–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, I., G. Gallais-Hamonno, Z. Liu, and R. Lutter. (1994). “Productivity Growth and Firm Ownership: An Analytical and Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Political Economy 102, 1006–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, P. J., R. D. Hill, and C. D. Trengove. (1986). “Measuring Airline Efficiency.” Fiscal Studies 7, 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathon, H.-J., and P. Pestieau. (1995). “Decomposing Efficiency into the Managerial and Regulatory Components. The Case of European Railways.” European Journal of Operation Research 80, 500–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, D., M. Nadiri, L. H. Röller, and R. C. Sickles. (1993). “Efficiency and Productivity Growth Comparisons of European and U.S. Air Carriers: A First Look at the Data.” The Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, D., L. H. Röller, and R. C. Sickles. (1995). “Airline Efficiency Differences Between Europe and the US: Implications for the Pace of EC Integration and Domestic Regulation.” European Journal of Operational Research 80, 508–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A., and W. Taylor. (1981). “Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects.” Econometrica 49, 1377–1399.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAO, International Civil Aviation Organisation. (1977–1990a). Digest of Statistics, Montreal.

  • ICAO, International Civil Aviation Organisation. (1977–1990b). Personel Series and Fleet Digest, Montreal.

  • ICAO, International Civil Aviation Organisation. (1977–1990c). Commercial Airline Traffic Series, Montreal.

  • Kalirajan, K. P. (1989). “On Measuring the Contribution of Human Capital to Agricultural Production.” Indian Economic Review 24, 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., S. C. Ghosh, and J. T. McGuckin. (1991). “A Generalised Production Frontier Approach for Estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in U.S. Dairy Farms.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 9, 279–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oum, T. H., and C. Yu. (1995). “A Productivity Comparison of the World's Major Airlines.” Journal of Air Transport Management 2, 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, M. M., and L.-F. Lee. 1981. “Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the IndonesianWeaving Industry.” Journal of Development Economics 9, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pestieau, P., and H. Tulkens. (1993). “Assessing and Explaining the Performance of Public Enterprises: Some Recent Evidence from the Productive Efficiency Viewpoint.” Finanz Archiv 50, 293–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, S. C., and K. Mukherjee. (1994). “Decomposition of the Fisher Ideal Index of Productivity: A Non-parametric Dual Analysis of U.S. Airlines Data.” University of Connecticut, mimeo.

  • Schmidt, P., and R. C. Sickles. (1984). “Production Frontiers and Panel Data.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2, 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sickles, R. C. (1985). “A Non-linear Multi-variate Error Component Analysis of Technology and Specific Factor Productivity Growth with an Application to the U.S. Airlines.” Journal of Econometrics 27, 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sickles, R. C., D. Good, and R. L. Johnson. (1986). “Allocative Distortions and the Regulatory Transition of the U.S. Airline Industry.” Journal of Econometrics 33, 143–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle, R. J. (1991). “The World's Airlines: A Cost and Productivity Comparison.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 25, 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coelli, T., Perelman, S. & Romano, E. Accounting for Environmental Influences in Stochastic Frontier Models: With Application to International Airlines. Journal of Productivity Analysis 11, 251–273 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007794121363

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007794121363

Navigation