Skip to main content
Log in

MDCK Cell Cultures as an Epithelial In Vitro Model: Cytoskeleton and Tight Junctions as Indicators for the Definition of Age-Related Stages by Confocal Microscopy

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells were grown in culture, and age-related morphological changes in the cytoskeleton and tight junction (TJ) network were used to define stages in view of establishing an optimal in vitro model for the epithelial barrier.

Methods. Growth curves and transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) were determined, and the cytoskeleton (actin, α-tubulin, vimentin) and TJ (Zonula occludens proteins ZO1, ZO2) were investigated with immunofluorescent methods by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and digital image restoration.

Results. TEER measurements indicated that TJ were functional after one day. Values then remained constant. Four morphological stages could be distinguished. Stage I (0−1 day): Sub confluent cultures with flat cells; TJ established after cell-to-cell contacts are made. Stage II (2−6 days): Confluent monolayers with a complete TJ network, which remains intact throughout the later stages. Stage III (7−14 days): Rearrangement in the cytoskeleton; constant cell number; volume and surface area of cells reduced (cobble-stone appearance). Stage IV (≥ 15 days): Dome formation, i.e. thickening and spontaneous uplifting of the cell monolayer.

Conclusions. Based on the structural characteristics of stage III cell cultures, which are closest to the in vivo situation, we expect them to represent an optimal in vitromodel to study drug transport and/or interactions with drugs and excipients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. K. L. Audus, R. L. Bartel, I. J. Hidalgo, and R. T. Borchardt. The use of cultured epithelial and endothelial cells for drug transport and metabolism studies. Pharm. Res. 7:435–451 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Artursson and R. T. Borchardt. Intestinal drug absorption and metabolism in cell cultures: Caco-2 and beyond. Pharm. Res. 14:1655–1658 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. A. McRoberts, M. Taub, and M. H. Saier. The Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell line. In G. Sato (ed.), Functionally Differentiated Cell Lines. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, 1981, pp. 117–139.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Gumbiner. Structure, biochemistry, and assembly of epithelial tight junctions. Am. J. Physiol. 253:749–758 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Bacallao, C. Antony, C. Dotti, E. Karsenti, E. H. K. Stelzer, and K. Simons. The subcellular organization of Madin Darby canine kidney cells during the formation of a polarized epithelium. J. Cell Biol. 109:2817–2832 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Eskelinen, V. Huotari, R. Sormunen, R. Palovuori, J. W. Kok, and V.-P. Lehto. Low intracellular pH induces redistribution of fodrin and instabilization of lateral walls in MDCK cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 150:122–133 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Gumbiner and K. Simons. A functional assay for proteins involved in establishing an epithelial occluding barrier: identification of a uvomorulin-like polypeptide. J. Cell Biol. 102:457–468 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Gumbiner, B. Stevenson, and A. Grimaldi. The role of the cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin in the formation and maintenance of the epithelial junctional complex. J. Cell Biol. 107:1575–1587 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Gonzalez-Mariscal, B. Chávez de Ramirez, and M. Cereijido. Tight junction formation in cultured epithelial cells (MDCK). J. Membr. Biol. 86:113–125 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Shotton and N. White. Confocal scanning microscopy: three-dimensional biological imaging. Trends Biochem. Sci. 14:435–439 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. C. Gonzalez and P. Wintz. Digital Image Processing, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. M. Rothen-Rutishauser, E. Ehler, E. Perriard, J. M. Messerli, and J.-C. Perriard. Different behaviour of the non-sarcomeric cytoskeleton in neonatal and adult rat cardiomyocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 30:19–31 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Schliwa, J. van Blerkom, and K. R. Porter. Stabilization of the cytoplasmic ground substance in detergent-opened cells and a structural and biochemical analysis of its composition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:4329–4333 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. E. Lever. Inducers of mammalian cell differentiation stimulate dome formation in a differentiated kidney epithelial cell line (MDCK). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:1323–1327 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Cereijido, E. S. Robbins, W. J. Dolan, C. A. Rutunno, and D. D. Sabatini. Polarized monolayers formed by epithelial cells on a permeable and translucent support. J. Cell Biol. 77:853–880 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. J. Cho, D. P. Thompson, C. T. Cramer, T. J. Vidmar, and J. F. Scieszka. The Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cell monolayer as a model cellular transport barrier. Pharm. Res. 6:71–77 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Butor and J. Davoust. Apical to basolateral surface area ratio and polarity of MDCK cells grown on different supports. Exp. Cell Res. 203:115–127 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  18. F. Cao and J. M. Burke. Protein insolubility and late-stage morphogenesis on long-term postconfluent cultures of MDCK epithelial cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 234:719–728 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. D. Valentich. Morphological similarities between the dog kidney cell line MDCK and the mammalian cortical collecting tubule. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 372:384–405 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. G. Farquhar and G. E. Palade. Junctional complexes in various epithelia. J. Cell Biol. 17:375–412 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. A. Jesaitis and D. A. Goodenough. Molecular characterization and tissue distribution of ZO-2, a tight junction protein homologous to ZO-1 and the Drosophila discs-large tumor supressor protein. J. Cell Biol. 124:949–961 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. E. Lever. Variant (MDCK) kidney epithelial cells altered in response to inducers of dome formation and differentiation. J. Cell Physiol. 122:45–52 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. M. Jaeger, V. Dodane, and B. Kachar. Modulation of tight junction morphology and permeability by an epithelial factor. J. Membr. Biol. 139:41–48 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rothen-Rutishauser, B., Krämer, S.D., Braun, A. et al. MDCK Cell Cultures as an Epithelial In Vitro Model: Cytoskeleton and Tight Junctions as Indicators for the Definition of Age-Related Stages by Confocal Microscopy. Pharm Res 15, 964–971 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011953405272

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011953405272

Navigation