Abstract
We present a combined theoretical and numerical procedure for sensitivity analyses of lung mechanics models that are nonlinear in both state variables and parameters. We apply the analyses to a recently proposed nonlinear lung model which incorporates a wide range of potential nonlinear identification conditions including nonlinear viscoelastic tissues, airway inhomogeneities via a parallel airway resistance distribution function, and a nonlinear block-structure paradigm. Additionally, we examine a system identification procedure which fits time- and frequency-domain data simultaneously. Model nonlinearities motivate sensitivity analyses involving numerical approximation of sensitivity coefficients. Examination of the normalized sensitivity coefficients provides direct insight on the relative importance of each model parameter, and hence the respective mechanism. More formal quantification of parameter uniqueness requires approximation of the paired and multidimensional parameter confidence regions. Combined with parameter estimation, we use the sensitivity analyses to justify tissue nonlinearities in modeling of lung mechanics for healthy and airway constricted conditions, and to justify both airway inhomogeneities and tissue nonlinearities during broncoconstriction. The tools in this paper are general and can be applied to a wide class of nonlinear models. © 1998 Biomedical Engineering Society.
PAC98: 8745Hw, 8710+e
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Avanzolini, G., and P. Barbini. A versatile identification method applied to analysis of respiratory mechanics. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 31:520-526, 1984.
Barbini, P., A. Cappello, and G. Cevenini. Real-time tracking of breathing parameters in mechanically ventilated dogs. In: Proceedings of the 10th Annual IEEE-EMBS Conference, 1988, pp. 700-703.
Barbini, P., G. Cevenini, K. R. Lutchen, and M. Ursino. Estimating respiratory mechanical parameters of ventilated patients: A critical study in the routine intensive care unit. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 32:153-160, 1994.
Bard, Y. Nonlinear Parameter Estimation. New York: Academic, 1974.
Barnas, G., D. Stamenovic, and K. R. Lutchen. Lung and chest wall impedance in the dog in the normal range of breathing: Effects of pulmonary edema. J. Appl. Physiol. 73: 1046-1049, 1992.
Barnas, G. M., D. Stamenovic, K. R. Lutchen, and C. F. Mackenzie. Lung and chest wall impedances in the dog: Effects of frequency and tidal volume. J. Appl. Physiol. 72:87-93, 1991.
Bates, J. H. T., and A. M. Lauzon. A nonstatistical approach to estimating confidence intervals about model parameters: Application to respiratory mechanics. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:94-100, 1992.
Csendes, T. Nonlinear parameter estimation by global optimization-efficiency and reliability. Acta Cyber. 8:361- 370, 1988.
Hantos, Z., A. Adamicza, E. Govaerts, and B. Daroczy. Mechanical impedances of lungs and chest wall in the cat. J. Appl. Physiol. 73:427-433, 1992.
Hantos, Z., B. Daroczy, B. Suki, S. Nagy, and J. J. Fredberg. Input impedance and peripheral inhomogeneity of dog lungs. J. Appl. Physiol. 72:168-178, 1992.
Hildebrandt, J. Pressure-volume data of cat lung interpreted by a plastoelastic linear viscoelastic model. J. Appl. Physiol. 28:365-372, 1970.
Lauzon, A. M., and J. H. T. Bates. Estimation of timevarying respiratory mechanical parameters by recursive least squares. J. Appl. Physiol. 71:1159-1165, 1991.
Lutchen, K. R., and H. Gillis. Relationship between heterogeneous changes in airway morphometry and lung resistance and elastance. J. Appl. Physiol. 83(4):1192-1201, 1997.
Lutchen, K. R., Z. Hantos, F. Petak, A. Adamicza, and B. Suki. Airway inhomogeneities contribute to apparent lung tissue resistance during constriction. J. Appl. Physiol. 80:1841-1849, 1996.
Lutchen, K. R., and A. C. Jackson. Statistical measures of parameter estimates from models fit to respiratory impedance data: Emphasis on joint variabilities. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 33:1000-1010, 1986.
Lutchen, K. R., and A. C. Jackson. Confidence bounds on respiratory mechanical properties estimated from transfer versus input impedance in humans versus dogs. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:644-650, 1992.
Lutchen, K. R., B. Suki, Q. Zhang, F. Peták, B. Daroczy, and Z. Hantos. Airway and tissue mechanics during physiological breathing and broncoconstriction in dogs. J. Appl. Physiol. 77:373-385, 1994.
MATLAB and SIMULINK Manuals 4.0, MatWorks Inc., 1993.
Navajas, D., S. Mijailovich, G. M. Glass, D. Stamenovic, and J. J. Fredberg. Dynamic response of the isolated passive rat diaphragm strip. J. Appl. Physiol. 73:2681-2692, 1992.
Peslin, R., C. Saunier, and M. Marchand. Analysis of lowfrequency lung impedance in rabbits with nonlinear models. J. Appl. Physiol. 79:771-780, 1995.
Peslin, R., M. Rotger, R. Farre, and D. Navajas. Assessment of respiratory pressure-volume nonlinearity in rabbits during mechanical ventilation. J. Appl. Physiol. 80:1637-1648, 1996.
Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery. Numerical recipes in C: The art of scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Rotger, M., R. Peslin, E. Oostveen, and C. Gallina. Confi-dence intervals of respiratory mechanical properties derived from transfer impedance. J. Appl. Physiol. 70:2432-2438, 1991.
Suki, B., and K. R. Lutchen. Pseudorandom signals to estimate apparent transfer and coherence functions of nonlinear systems: Applications to respiratory mechanics, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:1142-1151, 1992.
Suki, B., H. Yuan, Q. Zhang, and K. R. Lutchen. Partitioning of lung tissue response and inhomogeneous airway constriction at the airway opening. J. Appl. Physiol. 82:1349-1359, 1997.
Suki, B., Q. Zhang, and K. R. Lutchen. Relationship between frequency and amplitude dependence in the lung: A nonlinear block-structured modeling approach. J. Appl. Physiol. 79:660-671, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, H., Suki, B. & Lutchen, K.R. Sensitivity Analysis for Evaluating Nonlinear Models of Lung Mechanics. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 26, 230–241 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1114/1.117
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1114/1.117