Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The accountants are coming! How accountants can help policymakers in social program evaluation

  • Published:
Policy Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, numerous writers, accountants and non-accountants alike, have considered the relative merit of extending the scope of accountants' activities to include a role in social program evaluation. This paper attempts, firstly, to offer a framework which identifies various aspects of the evaluation process and, secondly, to highlight the contribution accountants can make within that framework. The paper consists of three sections. The first section considers activities which are typically performed by accountants in the profit-seeking sector of economy. The second section describes various facets of evaluation and the stages of program development, and attempts to integrate the two via a differential evaluation process. In the concluding section, it suggests that accountants do have a significant contribution to make to social program evaluation, and that this contribution is consonant with their role in profit-seeking enterprises. However, the paper also seeks to caution about the areas where accountants cannot and should not be expected to make contributions without specific training beyond their accounting expertise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Accounting Association (1957).Accounting and Reporting Standards for Corporate Financial Statements and Preceding Statements and Supplements. Columbus, Ohio: American Accounting Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Accounting Association (1966).A Statement of Basic Accounting Theory. Evanton, Ill.: American Accounting Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Accounting Association (1972). “Report on the Committee on Measures of Effectiveness for Social Programs,” Robert E. Jensen, Chairman,The Accounting Review, Supplement to Vol. XLVII.

  • Anthony, Robert N. and Herzlinger, Regina (1975)Management Control in Nonprofit Organizations. Homewood, Ill: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binner, P. (1973). “Program Evaluation,” in S. Feldman (ed.),The Administration of Mental Health Services. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnberg, Jacob G. and Gandhi, Natwar M. (1976). “Toward Defining the Accountant's Role in the Evaluation of Social Programs,”Accounting, Organizations and Society, June.

  • Churchman, C. West (1971). “On the Facility, Felicity, and Morality of Measuring Social Change,”The Accounting Review, (Jan.), 30–35.

  • Francis, M. E. (1973). “Accounting and the Evaluation of Social Programs: A Critical Comment,”The Accounting Review, (Apr.), 245–257.

  • Ginzberg, Eli and Solow, Robert M. (1974). “Some Lessons of the 1960's,”The Public Interest, (Winter), 210–220.

  • Iscoe, Ira (1974). “Evaluation for Mental Health Programs or The Accountants are Coming! The Accountants are Coming!” paper presented at American Psychological Association, International Meetings, Montreal, Canada.

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul (1971). “Accounting and Social Bookkeeping,” inAccounting in Perspective, Contribution to Accounting Thought by Other Disciplines, Robert R. Sterling and William F. Bentz (eds.). Cincinnati: South-Western Publ. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linowes, David F. (1968). “Socio-Economic Accounting,”The Journal of Accountancy (Nov.), 37–42.

  • Livingstone, John L. and Gunn, Stanford E. (1974).Accounting for Social Goals. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Ronald H. (1975). “Psychologists in Administrative Evaluation,”American Psychologist (June), 707–708.

  • Perloff, Robert, Perloff, Evelyn and Sussna, Edward, (1976). “Program Evaluation,”Annual Review Psychology (in press).

  • Simon, Herbert et al. (1954).Centralization vs. Decentralization in Organizing the Controllers' Department. New York: Controllership Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, Edward A. (1967).Evaluative Research, Principles and Practice in Public Service and Social Action Programs. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripodi, Tony, Fellin, Phillip and Epstein, Irwin (1971).Social Program Evaluation. Itasca, Ill.: F. E. Peacock Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Carol H. (1972).Evaluation Action Programs, Readings in Social Action and Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wholey, Joseph S. (1972). “What Can We Actually Get from Program Evaluation?”Policy Sciences,3: 361–369.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pittsburgh, 15260, Pittsburgh, Pa.

    Jacob G. Birnberg (Professor of Business Administration) & Natwar M. Gandhi (Assistant Professor of Business Administration)

Authors
  1. Jacob G. Birnberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Natwar M. Gandhi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Authors are grateful to Professor Arthur L. Thomas for his many valuable suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birnberg, J.G., Gandhi, N.M. The accountants are coming! How accountants can help policymakers in social program evaluation. Policy Sci 8, 469–481 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01727411

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01727411

Keywords

Search

Navigation