Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of Pharmacodynamic Recession Slopes for Direct and Indirect Response Models

  • Published:
Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Direct pharmacologic effects are known to recede over time with largely linear slopes (Levy's k · m product, J. Pharm. Sci. 53: 342, 1964) and indirect responses have similar behavior. Pharmacodynamic slope properties were examined mathematically for the Hill function with monoexponential drug disposition and simulations were carried out for other pharmacokinetic functions. Both types of pharmacodynamic profiles exhibit a single terminal inflection point (fp) when drug concentrations exceed the EC50 (that concentration causing one-half maximum effect, Emax ). For direct effects it was found that Cfp (the drug concentration at fp) =EC50 , the determinants of inflection time were identified, and Slopefp = −λzγEmax /4 where λz is the terminal disposition slope and γ is the Hill coefficient. These characteristics were explored for the four basic indirect response models which also exhibit recession profiles with slight sigmoidity and a single terminal inflection point at higher doses. The drug concentration at inflection Cfp is ≤IC50 or SC50 (drug concentrations causing half-maximal inhibition or stimulation), while the inflection response (Rfp ) attains constant values at larger doses. Indirect Response Models I, III, and IV have nearly linear return slopes for a wide range of doses which are governed by the disposition slope λz of the drug, loss constant kout of the response, maximum inhibition (Imax ) or stimulation (Smax ) factors, and a unique fractional constant (0<G≤1). Model II exhibits more complex behavior with recession slopes which are less likely to be parallel for various doses. Most indirect responses are expected to show nearly linear recession slopes which are parallel for moderate to large doses and mainly governed by an identical combination of pharmacokinetic (λz ), system (kout ), and dynamic capacity factors (Imax or Smax ).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. G. Levy. Relationship between elimination rate of drugs and rate of decline of their pharmacologic effects. J. Pharm. Sci. 53:342–343 (1964).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. J. G. Wagner. Relations between drug concentration and response. J. Mond. Pharm. 4:279–310 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Derendorf and G. Hochhaus. Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Correlation, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995, p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. L. Dayneka, V. Garg, and W. J. Jusko. Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 21:457–478 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Sharma and W. J. Jusko. Characterization of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 24:611–634 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Krzyzanski and W. J. Jusko. Mathematical formalism for the properties of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 25:107–123 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. W. Krzyzanski and W. J. Jusko. Mathematical formalism and characteristics of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses for drug infusions. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 26:385–408 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. W. J. Jusko, H. C. Ko, and W. F. Ebling. Convergence of direct and indirect pharmacodynamic response models. J. Pharmacokin. Biopharm. 23:5–8 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Krzyzanski and W. J. Jusko. Integrated functions of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic response. J. Pharm. Sci. 87:67–72 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. A. V. Hill. The possible effects of the aggregation of the molecules of hemoglobin on its dissociation curves. J. Physiol. 40:iv–vii (1910).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Knowles and S. S. Hwang. The influence of the shape of the plasma drug concentration profile upon the pharmacologic effect. Pharm. Res. 12:168–170 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Levy. Kinetics of pharmacologic effects. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 7:362–372 (1966).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. W. J. Jusko and H. C. Ko. Physiologic indirect response models characterize diverse types of pharmacodynamic effects. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 56:406–419 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Sharma and W. J. Jusko. Characteristics of indirect pharmacodynamic models and applications to clinical drug responses. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 45:229–239 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. T. D. Bjornsson and A. Terzie. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticoagulant drugs. The in vivo study of drug action. In C. J. van Boxtel, N. H. G. Holford, and M. Danhof (eds.), Elsevier Science Publishers, 1992, chap. 16, pp. 303–311.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krzyzanski, W., Jusko, W.J. Characterization of Pharmacodynamic Recession Slopes for Direct and Indirect Response Models. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 26, 409–436 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021012117627

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021012117627

Navigation