Skip to main content
Log in

Design considerations for STJ x-ray detectors

  • Superconducting Films And Tunnel Junction Detectors
  • Published:
Journal of Low Temperature Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The geometrical shape and layer thicknesses of superconducting tunnel junctions (STJ) influence their suitability as x-ray detectors. Examples relating to field biasing are discussed. Two related energy loss mechanisms are also modeled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.L. Petterson, Cryogenics 31, 132 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E.P. Houwman,et al., pages 255–263 in Low Temperature Detectors for Neutrinos and Dark Matter IV, N.E. Booth and G.L. Salmon, Editions Frontieres, 1991.

  3. A. Matsumura, T. Takahashi, and M. Kurakado, NIM A329, 227 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deborah Van Vechten and Kent S. Wood, IEEE Trans. on Appl. SuperCond. 3, 2096 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kent S. Wood and Deborah Van Vechten, to be submitted.

  6. Hans le Grand, personal communication, July 1993.

  7. M. Kurakado, personal communication, July 1992.

  8. See Superconductive Particle Detectors, A. Barone,ed, World Scientific,1988.

  9. See, for example, the spectra in C.A. Mears, S.E. Labov, and A.T. Barfknecht, submitted to Appl. Phys. Let., May, 1993.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Vechten, D., Blamire, M.G., Fritz, G.G. et al. Design considerations for STJ x-ray detectors. J Low Temp Phys 93, 671–676 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693494

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00693494

Keywords

Navigation