Abstract
The monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus L., oviposits mainly on plants in the Asclepiadaceae, particularly within the genus Asclepias. We studied postalightment oviposition behavior of monarch females on three host species—Asclepias curassavica, A. incarnata , and A. tuberosa. After landing on the host, they used their forelegs, midlegs, and antennae to assess plant suitability. When these appendages were examined by scanning electron microscopy, contact chemoreceptor sensilla were found. In choice tests, A. incarnata was most preferred, while A. tuberosa was least preferred. However, the use of appendages varied for the different host species. Antennae were most frequently used during post-alightment behavior on A. curassavica, whereas forelegs were used more often on A. incarnata, and all three appendages were used extensively on A. tuberosa. Use of the midlegs was generally followed by use of the antennae. Tasting with either forelegs or antennae apparently may lead to egg laying on some host species. Rupture of the plant surface by midleg spines was also observed. The behavior and host preference of individual females varied significantly and may reflect differences in receptor sensitivity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ackery, P. R., and Vane-Wright, R. I. (1984). Milkweed Butterflies and Their Cladistics and Biology, British Museum, London, pp. 201-203.
Allard, R. A., and Papaj, D. R. (1996). Learning of leaf shape by pipevine swallowtail butterflies: A test using artificial leaf models. J. Insect Behav. 9: 961-967.
Anderson, P., and Halleberg, E. (1990). Structure and distribution of tactile and bimodal taste/tactile sensilla on the ovipositor, tarsi and antennae of the flour moth, Ephestia kuehneilla (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Int. J. Insect Morphol. Embryol. 19: 13-23.
Bart, K. M., and Williams, E. H. (1993). Use of dental wax for the study of insect behavior by scanning electron microscopy. Microsc. Res. Techn. 26: 180-181.
Baur, R., Feeny, P., and Städler, E. (1993). Oviposition stimulants for the black swallowtail butterfly: Identification of electrophysiologically active compounds in carrot volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 919-938.
Baur, R., Haribal, M., Renwick, J. A. A., and Städler, E. (1998). Contact chemoreception related to host and oviposition behavior in the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus. Physiol. Entomol. 23: 7-19.
Boodley, J. W., and Sheldrake, R. (1977). Cornell peat-lite mixes for commercial plant growing. Cornell Inform. Bull. 42: 1-8.
Boppré, M. (1983). Leaf scratching-a specialised behaviour of danainae butterflies (Lepidoptera) for gathering secondary plant substances. Oecologia (Berlin) 59: 414-416.
Calvert, W. H. (1974). The external morphology of foretarsal receptors involved with host discrimination by the nymphalid butterfly Chlosyne lacinia. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67: 853-856.
Calvert, W. H., and Hanson, F. E. (1983). The role of sensory structures and preoviposition behavior in oviposition by the Patch butterfly, Chlosyne lacinia. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 33: 179-187.
Chadha, G. K., and Roome, R. E. (1980). Oviposition behavior and the sensilla of the ovipositor of Chilo partellus and Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Zool. (Lond.) 192: 169-178.
Dixon, C. A., Erickson, J. M., Kellet, D. N., and Rothschild, M. (1978). Some adaptations between Danaus plexippus and its food plant with notes on Danaus chrysippus and Euploea core (Insecta: Lepidoptera). J. Zool. (Lond.) 185: 437-467.
Du, Y. J., Van Loon, J. J. A., and Renwick, J. A. A. (1995). Contact chemoreception of oviposition-stimulating glucosinolates and an oviposition-deterrent cardenolide in two subspecies of Pieris napi. Physiol. Entomol. 20: 164-174.
Feeny, P., Städler, E., Åhman, I., and Carter, M. (1989). Effects of plant odor on oviposition by the black swallowtail butterfly, Papilio polyxenes (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). J. Insect Behav. 2: 803-827.
Fox, R. M. (1966). Forelegs of butterflies I. Introduction: Chemoreception. J. Res. Lepidop. 5: 1-12.
Frazier, J. L. (1985). How animals perceive secondary plant compounds. In Blum, M. S. (ed.), Fundamentals of Insect Physiology, Wiley, New York, pp. 89-134.
Frings, H., and Frings, M. (1959). Studies on antennal contact chemoreception by the wood nymph butterfly, Cercyonis pegala. J. N.Y. Entomol. Soc. 42: 97-106.
Haribal, M., and Renwick, J. A. A. (1996). Oviposition stimulants for monarch butterfly: Flavonol glycosides from Asclepias curassavica. Phytochemistry 41: 139-144.
Haribal, M., and Renwick, J. A. A. (1998). Identification and distribution of oviposition stimulants for monarch butterflies in hosts and non-hosts. J. Chem. Ecol. 26: 891-906.
Huang, X. P., and Renwick, J. A. A. (1993). Differential selection of host plants by two Pieris species: The role of oviposition stimulants and deterrents. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 68: 59-69.
Hughes, P. R., Radke, C. D., and Renwick, J. A. A. (1993). A simple low-input method for continuous laboratory rearing of the monarch butterfly (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) for research. Am. Entomol. 39: 109-111.
Ichinose, T., and Honda, H. (1978). Ovipositional behavior of Papilio protenor demetrius Cramer and the factors involved in its host plants. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 13: 103-114.
Kent, K. S., and Griffin, L. M. (1990). Sensory organs of the thoracic legs of the moth Maduca sexta. Cell Tissue Res. 259: 209-224.
Klijnstra, J. W., and Roessingh, P. (1986). Perception of the oviposition deterring pheromone by tarsal and abdominal contact chemoreceptor in Pieris brassica. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 40: 71-80.
Ma, W. C., and Schoonhoven, L. M. (1973). Tarsal contact chemosensory hairs of the large white butterfly, Pieris brassicae, and their possible role in oviposition behaviour. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 16: 343-357.
Mackay, D. A., and Jones, R. E. (1989). Leaf shape and the host-finding behavior of two ovipositing monophagus butterfly species. Ecol. Entomol. 14: 423-432.
Marion-Poll, F. C., Guillaumin, D., and Masson, C. (1992). Sexual dimorphism of tarsal receptors and sensory equipment of the ovipositor in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis. Cell Tissue Res. 267: 507-518.
Myers, J. (1968). The structure of the antennae of the Florida queen butterfly, Danaus gilippus bernice (Cramer). J. Morphol. 25: 315-328.
Myers, J. (1969). Distribution of foodplant chemoreceptors on the female Florida queen butterfly Danaus gilippus bernice (Nymphalidae). J. Lepidop. Soc. 23: 196-198.
Ramaswamy, S. B. (1988). Host-finding by moths: Sensory modalities and behaviours. J. Insect Physiol. 34: 235-249.
Ramaswamy, S. B., Ma, W. K., and Baker, G. T. (1987). Sensory cues and receptors for oviposition by Heliothis virescens. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 43: 159-168.
Rausher, M. D. (1995). Behavioral ecology of oviposition in the pipevine swallowtail, Battus philenor. In Scriber, J. M., Tsubaki, Y., and Lederhouse, R. C. (eds.), Scientific, Gainesville, FL, pp. 53-62.
Renwick, J. A. A., and Chew, F. S. (1994). Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39: 377-400.
Renwick, J. A. A., and Huang, X. (1994). Interacting chemical stimuli mediating oviposition by Lepidoptera. In Ananthakrishnan, T. N. (ed.), Functional Dynamics of Phytophagus Insects, Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, pp. 79-94.
Roessingh, P., Städler, E., Schöni, R., and Feeny, P. (1991). Tarsal contact chemoreceptors of the black swallowtail butterfly Papilio polyxenes responses to phytochemicals from host and non-host plants. Physiol. Entomol. 16: 485-495.
Siegel, S., and Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Singer, M. C. (1986). The definition and measurement of oviposition preferences in plant-feeding insects. In Miller, J. R., and Miller, T. A. (eds.), Insect-Plant Interactions, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 65-94.
Singer, M. C., Vasco, D., Parmesan, C., Thomas, C. D., and Ng, D. (1992). Distinguishing between preference and motivation in food choice an example from insect oviposition. Anim. Behav. 44: 463-471.
Snedecor, W. G., and Cochran, G. W. (1989). Statistical Methods, Iowa State University Press, Ames.
Städler, E. (1974). Host plant stimuli affecting oviposition behavior of the eastern spruce budworm. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 17: 176-188.
Städler, E., Renwick, J. A. A., Radke, C. D., and Sachdev-Gupta, K. (1995). Tarsal contact chemoreceptor response to glucosinolates and cardenolides mediating oviposition in Pieris rapae. Physiol. Entomol. 20: 175-187.
Stanton, M. L. (1984). Short-term learning and searching accuracy of egg-laying butterflies. Anim. Behav. 32: 33-40.
Traynier, R. M. M., and Hines, E. R. (1987). Probes by aphids indicated by stain induced fluorescence in leaves. Ent. Exp. Appl. 5: 198-201.
Urquhart, F. A. (1960). The Monarch Butterflies: International Traveller, Nelson-Hall, Chicago, pp. 81-84.
Zalucki, M. P., Brower, L. P., and Malcolm, S. B. (1990). Oviposition by Danaus plexippus in relation to cardenolide content of three Asclepias species in southeastern U.S.A. Ecol. Entomol. 15: 231-240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haribal, M., Renwick, J.A.A. Differential Postalightment Oviposition Behavior of Monarch Butterflies on Asclepias Species. Journal of Insect Behavior 11, 507–538 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022363329446
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022363329446