Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular Simulation of Joule–Thomson Inversion Curves

  • Published:
International Journal of Thermophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method to determine Joule–Thomson inversion curves, using isobaric-isothermal Monte Carlo molecular simulations, is presented. The usual experimental practice to obtain the locus of points in which the isenthalpic derivative of temperature with respect to pressure vanishes is to process volumetric data by means of thermodynamic relations. This experimental procedure requires the very precise measurement of volumetric properties at conditions up to five times the fluid's critical temperature and twelve times its critical pressure. These harsh experimental conditions have hindered the publication of data for even simple fluids and mixtures. By using molecular simulation, these problems may be circumvented, since the computational effort is roughly independent of the actual value of the pressure or the temperature. In general, Joule–Thomson inversion curves obtained by molecular simulation may be used either as an unambiguous test for equations of state in the supercritical and high-pressure regions or for the prediction of real fluid behavior, should the potential be well known. Both applications are exemplified for a Lennard-Jones fluid for which the complete inversion curve is obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. W. G. Kortekaas, C. J. Peters, and J. de Swaan Arons, Fluid Phase Equil. 139:205 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. D. Gunn, P. L. Chueh, and J. M. Prausnitz, Cryogenics 6:324 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. G. Miller, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 9:585 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. G. Castillo, C. M. Colina, J. E. Dubuc, and C. Olivera-Fuentes, Int. J. Thermophys., in press.

  5. A. V. Colazo, F. A. Da Silva, E. A. Müller, and C. Olivera-Fuentes, Lat. Am. Appl. Res. 22:135 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Song and E. A. Mason, J. Chem. Phys. 91:7840 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. D. M. Heyes and C. T. Llaguno, Chem. Phys. 168:61 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Lustig, J. Chem. Phys. 100:3068 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. M. Colina and E. A. Müller, Mol. Simulat. 19:237 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. K. Johnson, J. A. Zollweg, and K. E. Gubbins, Mol. Phys. 78:591 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Kolafa and I. Nezbeda, Fluid Phase Equil. 100:1 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Lofti, J. Vrabec, and J. Fischer, Mol. Phys. 76:1319 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colina, C.M., Müller, E.A. Molecular Simulation of Joule–Thomson Inversion Curves. International Journal of Thermophysics 20, 229–235 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021402902877

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021402902877

Navigation