Skip to main content
Log in

Broadband IF matching for quasioptical mixers

  • Published:
International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Everyone recognizes the need to drive symmetric quasioptical antennas in a symmetric way to maintain clean antenna patterns; in this note we report on the advantages of bringing out the IF in a symmetric (balanced) way as well. The main difference in IF circuits between waveguide and open structure mixers is that the quasioptical mixers are usually also open at IF wavelengths, so IF currents can flow on the outside of the mixer mounting structures. We measured these surface currents and their associated resonances on a scale model of our mixer block for a 690 GHz SIS mixer. Bringing the IF off the mixer with a balanced circuit solves the surface current problems, yielding a broad bandwidth with predictable impedances. We successfully tested an octave bandwidth IF matching circuit for open structure mixers that incorporates a commercial 180° hybrid at cryogenic temperatures. We also found that surface currents are not significant for corner cube mixers because they generate their own balancing currents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eckart, A., Harris, A.I., and Wohlleben, R. 1988, “Scaled Model Measurements of the Sandwiched V-Antenna,”Int'l J. IR and mm Waves 9, 505.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Emerson and Cuming, Canton, MA.

  3. Bowman, D.F. 1961, ch. 31 in “Antenna Engineering Handbook,” ed. H. Jasik, McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bawer, R., and Wolfe, J.J. 1960, “A Printed Circuit Balun for Use with Spiral Antennas,”IRE Trans. MTT-8, 319.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oltman, G. 1966, “The Compensated Balun,”IEEE Trans. MTT-14, 112.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laughlin, G.J. 1976, “A New Impedance-Matched Wide-Band Balun and Magic Tee,”IEEE Trans. MTT-24, 135.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Phelan, H.R. 1970, “A Wide-Band Parallel-Connected Balun,”IEEE Trans. MTT-18, 259.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Duncan, J.W., and Minerva, V.P. 1960, “100∶1 Bandwidth Balun Transformer,”Proc. IRE 48, 156.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tzu-hung Chen et al. 1991, “Broadband Monolitic Passive Baluns and Monolithic Double-Balanced Mixer,”IEEE Trans. MTT-39, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schiek, B., and Köhler, J. 1976, “An Improved Microstrip-to-Microslot Transition,”IEEE Trans. MTT-24, 231.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mini-Circuits, Brookline, NY, model ZFSCJ-2-1-S.

  12. Terman, F.E. 1943, “Radio Engineers' Handbook,” p. 53, McGraw-Hill: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M/A-Com, Control Components Division, Merrimack, NH, model 2031-6331-00.

  14. Harris, A.I., Jaffe, D.T., Stutzki, J. and Genzel, R. 1987, “The UCB/MPE Cassegrain Submillimeter Heterodyne Spectrometer,”Int'l J. IR and mm Waves 8, 857.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harris, A.I., Schuster, K.F. & Tacconi, L.J. Broadband IF matching for quasioptical mixers. Int J Infrared Milli Waves 14, 715–728 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209277

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02209277

Key words

Navigation