Skip to main content
Log in

An Incumbent Country View on Eastern Enlargement of the EU Part I: A General Treatment

  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An eastern enlargement of the EU, from an incumbent country point of view,involves a fiscal burden from extending Union agricultural and cohesion policiesto new members, coupled with potential gains as well as adjustment problemsderiving from an extended customs union and a larger single market. Enlargementis controversial, because the net effect is unclear, a priori, and will certainly vary across individual countries. Our two-part contribution tries to do shed light on this controversy. In this first part, we present a general treatment of the likely effects on different incumbent countries, while a subsequent companion paper will take a closer look at the specific case of Austria. The general view of part I, in turn, first focuses on various empirical measures highlighting crucial differences between incumbents, pertaining to the fiscal burden on the one hand, and integration gains on the other. We then argue that a proper evaluation must rely on an explicit welfare criterion, and we use a general model of economic integration in order to identify the principalchannels through which aggregate welfare of an incumbent country is affected by an enlargement of the EU. We address traditional effects of trade creation and trade diversion, as well as growth effects arising from an abolition of trade barriers. In addition, we ask how enlargement affects foreign direct investmentand labor migration, and what this implies in welfare terms for an incumbent western European country. Taken together, these effects generate a certain presumption of integration gains, which need to be set against the fiscal burden. However, a final judgement requires a case-by-case approach, based on empirical implementations of enriched and parameterized models for specific countries. The companion paper, therefore, uses a suitably specified, calibrated dynamic equilibrium model, in order to take a closer look at the Austrian case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anell, L. et al. (1998) Removing Obstacles to Deeper Economic Integration in the Broad European Trade Area. Centre for European Policy Studies, Working Party Report No. 22, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. E. (1989) 'Growth Effects of 1992', Economic Policy 9, 247-281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. E., (1992) 'Measurable Dynamic Gains from Trade', Journal of Political Economy 100, 162-174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. E. and Venables, J. (1995) 'Regional Economic Integration', in G. Grossman and K. Rogoff, eds, Handbook of International Economics. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, pp. 1597-1644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. E., Francois, J. F., and Portes, R. (1997) 'The Costs and Benefits of Eastern Enlargement: The Impact on the EU and Central Europe', Economic Policy, 127-176.

  • Baldwin, R. E. and Farslid, R. (2000) 'Trade Liberalization and Endogenous Growth: A q-Theory Approach', Journal of International Economics 50, 497-518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J., Greenaway, D., and Panagariya, A. (1998) 'Trading Preferentially: Theory and Policy', The Economic Journal 109, 1128-1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. J. (1995) 'The Economic Benefits from Immigration', Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, 3-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenton, P. (1999) Trade and Investment in Europe: The Impact of the Next Enlargement. Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breuss, F. (1995) Costs and Benefits of EU's Eastern European Enlargement. Yriö Jahnsson European Integration Lectures, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission, European (1996) Economic Evaluation of the Internal Market, European Economy, No. 4.

  • Commission, European (1998a) Financing the European Union. Commission Report on the Operation of the Own Resources System. European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission, European (1998b) Commission Communication to the Council and to the European Parliament on the Establishment of a New Financial Perspective for the Period 2000-2006. European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission, European (1999) Interinstitutional Agreement Between The European Parliament, The Council, and The Commission of May 6 1999 on Budgetary Discipline and Improvement of the Budgetary Procedure. European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council, European (1999) Presidency Conclusion-Berlin European Council, 24 and 25 March 1999. European Council, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. and Stiglitz, J. E. (1977) 'Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity', American Economic Review 67, 297-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. and Norman, V. (1980) Theory of International Trade. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W. J. (1982) 'National and International Returns to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade', American Economic Review 72, 389-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasiorek, M., Smith, A., and Venables, A. J. (1991) 'Completing the Internal Market in the EC: Factor Demands and Comparative Advantage', in L. Winters and A. Venables, eds, European Integration: Trade and Industry. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 9-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasiorek, M., Smith, A., and Venables, A. J. (1992) '1992: Trade, Factor Prices and Welfare in General Equilibrium', in L. Winters, ed, Trade Flows and Trade Policy after 1992. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 35-66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, H. (1983) 'Some Implications of Non-Homotheticity in Production in a Two-Sector General Equilibrium Model with Monopolistic Competition', Journal of International Economics 14, 85-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuschnigg, C. (1998) 'Investment Externalities and a Corrective Subsidy', International Tax and Public Finance 5, 449-469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuschnigg, C. and Kohler, W. (1996a) 'Austria in the European Union: Dynamic Gains from Integration and Distributional Implications', Economic Policy 22, 155-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuschnigg, C. and Kohler, W. (1996b) 'Commercial Policy and Dynamic Adjustment under Monopolistic Competition', Journal of International Economics 40, 373-409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, W. (2000a) 'Die Osterweiterung der EU aus der Sicht bestehender Mitgliedsländer:Was lehrt uns die Theorie der ökonomischen Integration?', Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 1, 115-141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, W. (2000b) 'Wer gewinnt, wer verliert durch die Osterweiterung der EU?', in L. Hoffmann, ed, Erweiterung der EU. Duncker-Humblot, Berlin, pp. 27-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, D. (1998) Guide to the European Union, 6th ed. The Economist in association with Profile Books, Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1997) Indicators of Tariff and Non-tariff Trade Barriers. OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya, A. (1997) 'The Meade Model of Preferential Trading: History, Analytics, and Policy Implications', in B. Cohen, ed, International Trade and Finance: New Frontiers for Research, Essays in Honor of Peter B. Kenen. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 57-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1997) Has Globalization Gone Too Far? Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1994) 'The Origins of Endogenous Growth', Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 3-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H. and Young, A. R. (1996) 'The Single Market: A New Approach to Policy', in H.Wallace and W. Wallace, eds, Policy Making in the European Union. Oxford University Press, pp. 125-155.

  • Wong, Kar-yui (1995) International Trade in Goods and Factor Mobility. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kohler, W., Keuschnigg, C. An Incumbent Country View on Eastern Enlargement of the EU Part I: A General Treatment. Empirica 27, 325–351 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010929126735

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010929126735

Keywords

Navigation