Skip to main content
Log in

Lessons from the transition process

  • Published:
Empirica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The illusions that market mechanism would transform former communist countries easily into welfare states were gradually replaced by disappointments. Major problems are common to all countries in transition; they all endured an unprecedented fall in measured output and rise of unemployment. Four countries: former Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, and Slovenia constitute a group in which the fall was the lowest and which also have reached the bottom. While the mechanisms of depression in these countries differ basic links of the “vicious circle” seem to be similar. The transition is reflected in constitutional provisions on property rights; new constitutions depart radically from their socialist predecessors, return to the principles of French revolution, and provide more than adequate protection of private property. Equally important are legal frameworks for market activities, and privatization aimed to improve efficiency, enable fairness, and serve in the abolition of the monoparty system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bajt, A. (1992)A Property Rights Analysis of the Transition Problems in the EAST, Ljubljana: EIPF, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOCUS: Eastern Europe (1993)Deutsche Bank Research, No. 85, Frankfurt.

  • Gabrich, H. (1993)Under the Impact of Western Recession, WIIW Forschungsberichte No. 197b, June 1993.

  • Grey, W.C. et al. (1991, 1992)The Legal Framework for Private Sector Development in a Transitional Economy, Working Papers on Poland, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Romania; The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, P. (1991) ‘The Assessment: Microeconomics of Transition in Eastern Europe’,Oxford Review of Economic Policy 7 (4), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (1992) ‘Large Scale Privatization in Central Europe: Practical and Conceptual Issues’,Discussion Papers on the Economic Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe, Louven 1992/1.

  • Kornai, J. (1993) ‘Anti-Depression Cure for Ailing Postcommunist Economies’ (interview),Transition, February 1993.

  • Korze, U. (1992) ‘Decentralized Privatization Strategy: Pitfalls and Benefits—Slovenia’, in Simoneti, M. and Bohm, A. (eds.)Privatization in Central and Eastern Europe 1991, Ljubljana: Central and Eastern European Privatization Network, pp. 140–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krovak, J.et al. (1993)The Czech and Slovak Economies After the Split, WIIW, Forschungsberichte, No. 199, June 1993.

  • Urban, L. (1990) ‘Objectives, Methods and Problems of Privatization’, inPrivatization in Eastern Europe, Proceedings of the Conference “Privatization: How to Use This Instrument for Economic Reform in Eastern Europe”, Vienna, November 17–18, 1990.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mencinger, J. Lessons from the transition process. Empirica 20, 189–204 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384252

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01384252

Key Words

JEL-Code

Navigation