Skip to main content
Log in

Biochemical correlates of genetic variation in marine lower invertebrates

  • Published:
Biochemical Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper extensive data on enzyme variation in 23 species of coelenterates and sponges were used to investigate the possible correlation of levels of genetic variation with various parameters of enzyme molecular structure and function. The data provide an opportunity not only to look for such correlations for the first time in lower invertebrates, but also to study organisms with far higher average levels of genetic variability than those used in any previous work. A clear inverse relationship was found between enzyme subunit number and levels of polymorphism, with monomers being more variable than dimers or tetramers. No significant difference in polymorphism could be found in enzymes of the functional groups I and II of Gillespie and Langley (1974). Regulatory enzymes appeared to be significantly more polymorphic than nonregulatory enzymes, but a significant relationship was observed between regulatory power and subunit structure which could bias this result. The results suggest that both neutralist and selectionist ideas may have a useful role to play in the understanding of the factors which can influence or limit levels of genetic variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayre, D. J. (1984). The effects of sexual and asexual reproduction on geographic variation in the sea anemoneActinia tenebrosa.Oecologia 62222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, P. R. (1978).Sponges Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, G. J. (1970).An Introduction to Isozyme Techniques. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickenson, R. E. (1971). The structure of cytochrome c and the rates of molecular evolution.J. Mol. Evol. 126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M., and Webb, E. C. (1979).Enzymes 3rd ed., Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fincham, J. R. S. (1972). Heterozygous advantage as a likely general basis for enzyme polymorphisms.Heredity 28387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, J. H., and Kojima, K. (1968). The degree of polymorphism in enzymes involved in energy production compared to that in non-specific enzymes in twoDrosophila ananassae populations.Genetics 61837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, J. H., and Langley, C. H. (1974). A general model to account for enzyme variation in natural populations.Genetics 76837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gojobori, T. (1982). Means and variances of heterozygosity and protein function. In Kimura, M. (ed.),Molecular Evolution, Protein Polymorphism and the Neutral Theory Japan Scientific Society Press, Tokyo, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, H., and Hopkinson, D. A. (1978).Handbook of Enzyme Electrophoresis in Human Genetics North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, H., Hopkinson, D. A., and Edwards, Y. H. (1977). Polymorphism and the subunit structure of enzymes: A contribution to the neutralist-selectionist controversy.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochachka, P. W., and Somero, G. N. (1984).Biochemical Adaptation Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkinson, D. A., Edwards, Y. H., and Harris, H. (1976). The distribution of subunit numbers and subunit sizes of enzymes: A study of the products of 100 human loci.Ann. Hum. Genet. 39383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. B. (1971). Metabolic implications of polymorphism as an adaptive strategy.Nature 232347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. B. (1973). Importance of substrate variability to enzyme polymorphism.Nature New Biol. 243151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. B. (1974). Enzyme polymorphism and metabolism.Science 18428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G. B. (1976). Genetic polymorphism and enzyme function. In Ayala, F. J. (ed.),Molecular Evolution Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. (1968). Evolutionary rate at the molecular level.Nature 217624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M. (1983).The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, M., and Ohta, T. (1974). On some principles governing molecular evolution.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 712848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, R. K., and Eanes, W. F. (1977). Subunit size and genetic variation of enzymes in natural populations ofDrosophila.Theor. Pop. Biol. 11330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, R. K., and Eanes, W. F. (1978). Molecular structure and protein within and among populations.Evol. Biol. 1139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, K., Gillespie, J., and Tobari, Y. N. (1970). A profile ofDrosophila species enzymes assayed by electrophoresis. I. Numbers of alleles, heterozygosities and linkage disequilibrium in glucose metabolizing systems and some other enzymes.Biochem. Genet. 4627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehninger, A. L. (1975).Biochemistry Worth, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei, M., Fuerst, P. A., and Chakraborty, R. (1978). Subunit molecular weight and genetic variability of proteins in natural populations.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 753359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, K., and Hedgecock, D. (1980). Enzyme polymorphism and adaptive strategy in the decapod Crustacea.Am. Nat. 116238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, E. (1978). Genetic variation in natural populations: patterns and theory.Theor. Pop. Biol. 13121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevo, E. (1983). Adaptive significance of protein variation. In Oxford, G. S., and Rollinson, D. (eds.),Protein Polymorphism: Adaptive and Taxonomic Significance Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. R. (1975). Protein variation in natural populations of animals.Evol. Biol. 879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quicke, D. L. J., and Brace R. C. (1983). Phenotypic and genotypic spacing within an aggregation of the sea anemone,Actinia equina.J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 63493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, R. C., and Wold, F. (1976). The subunit structure of glycolytic enzymes.Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 54B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander, R. K. (1976). Genetic variation in natural populations. In Ayala, F. J. (ed.),Molecular Evolution Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. J., and Fujio, Y. (1982). Genetic variation in marine teleosts: High variability in habitat specialists and low variability in habitat generalists.Mar. Biol. 697.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R. D. (1977). Relationship between enzyme heterozygosity and quaternary structure.Biochem. Genet. 15123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R. D. (1978). Subunit size of enzymes and genetic heterozygosity in vertebrates.Biochem. Genet. 16779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R. D., and Skibinski, D. O. F. (1988). Evidence that mitochondrial enzymes are genetically less variable than cytoplasmic enzymes.Genet. Res. Cambr. 51121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouros, E. (1975). Electrophoretic variation in allozymes related to function or structure?Nature 254446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zouros, E. (1976). Hybrid molecules and the superiority of the heterozygote.Nature 262227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A. M. Sole-Cava was supported by grants from CAPES and FAPERJ (Brazil).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sole-Cava, A.M., Thorpe, J.P. Biochemical correlates of genetic variation in marine lower invertebrates. Biochem Genet 27, 303–312 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00554165

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00554165

Key words

Navigation