Skip to main content
Log in

The management of high seas fisheries

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intergovernmental United Nations Conference on Highly Migratory and Straddling Stocks, initiated in 1993 and finished in 1995, addressed the conservation and management of fishery resources located both within the coastal state 200 mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and the adjacent high seas. These types of marine resources continue to be a source for international conflicts and debates. The original United Nations Law of the Sea of 1982 failed to address transboundary fisheries in a proper way. In particular, the agreement did not recognize the emergence of the complicated “straddling stock” issue. In the new United Nations Law of the Sea agreement of 1995, a consensus was reached that the management of the straddling and highly migratory fish stocks should be carried out through regional fisheries management organizations. We present a review of the straddling stock issues in the international agreement emerging from the negotiations within the United Nations. The review is contrasted with and clarified by game theoretic analyses. We also discuss one international fishery exemplifying the case, the Norwegian spring‐spawning herring. The main conclusion is that the local problems, faced during the stage of setting up regional fisheries organizations for the management of straddling and highly migratory fish stocks, are expected to be much more complicated and difficult to solve as compared to the cases of “shared fish stocks”. In the current paper, we present two reasons for this increased complexity. The first is the larger number of players as compared to the case of “shared fish stocks” and the second is the possibility of new members entering the regional fisheries organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Arin and V. Feltkamp, The nucleolus and kernel of veto-rich transferable utility games, International Journal of Game Theory 26 (1997) 61-73.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Bjørndal, A.D. Hole, W.M. Slinde, F. Asche and S. Reithe, Norwegian spring spawning herring-some biological and economic issues: An update, Foundation for Research in Economics and Business Administration, Working paper No. 46/1998, Bergen.

  3. F.T. Christy and A.D. Scott, The Common Wealth in Ocean Fisheries (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.W. Clark, Mathematical Bioeconomics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources (Wiley, New York, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  5. C.W. Clark, Restricted access to common-property fishery resources: A game theoretic analysis, in: Dynamic Optimization and Mathematical Economics, ed. P. Liu (Plenum, New York, 1980) pp. 117-132.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R.D. Eckert, The Enclosure of Ocean Resources: Economics and the Law of the Sea (Hoover Institution Press, Stanford, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. FAO Fisheries Department, Marine fisheries and the Law of the Sea: A decade of change, Special chapter (revised) of The State of Food and Agriculture 1992, FAO Fisheries Circular, No 853, FAO (1993).

  8. V. Kaitala, Game theory models of dynamic bargaining and contracting in fisheries management, Systems Research Reports A11, Helsinki University of Technology, Institute of Mathematics (1985).

  9. V. Kaitala, Game theory models in fisheries management-A survey, in: Dynamic Games and Applications in Economics, ed. T. Basar, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (Springer, Berlin, 1986) pp. 252-266.

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. Kaitala, Nonuniqueness of no-memory feedback equilibria in a fishery resource game, Automatica 25 (1989) 587-592.

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. Kaitala and M. Lindroos, Sharing the benefits of cooperation in high seas fisheries: A characteristic function game approach, Natural Resource Modeling 11 (1998) 275-299.

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. Kaitala and G.R. Munro, The management of high seas fisheries, Marine Resource Economics 8 (1993) 313-329.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. Kaitala and G.R. Munro, The economic management of high seas fishery resources: Some game theory aspects, in: Control and Game-Theoretic Models of the Environment, eds. C. Carraro and J.A. Filar, Annals of the International Society of Dynamics Games (Birkh¨auser, Boston, 1995) pp. 299-318.

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. Kaitala and G.R. Munro, The management of transboundary resources and property rights systems: The case of fisheries, in: Property Rights and the Environment. Social and Ecological Issues, eds. S. Hanna and M. Munasinghe (The Beijer International Institute of Ecological Economics and the World Bank, Washington, 1995) pp. 69-83.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. Kaitala and G.R. Munro, The conservation and management of high seas fishery resources under the new law of the sea, Natural Resource Modeling 10 (1997) 87-108.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Kaitala and M. Pohjola, Optimal recovery of a shared resource stock: A differential game model with efficient memory equilibria, Natural Resource Modeling 3 (1988) 91-119.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Mesterton-Gibbons, Game-theoretic resource modeling, Natural Resource Modeling 7 (1993) 93-147.

    Google Scholar 

  18. G.R. Munro, The optimal management of transboundary fisheries: Game theoretic considerations, Natural Resource Modeling 4 (1990) 403-426.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G.R. Munro, The management of high seas fishery resources, in: Proceedings of the 7th IIFET Conference, Taipei (1994).

  20. G.R. Munro and A.D. Scott, The economics of fisheries management, in: Handbook of Natural Resources and Energy Economics, Vol. II, eds. A.V. Kneese and J.L. Sweeney (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985) pp.623-76.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Nash, The bargaining problem, Econometrica 18 (1950) 155-162.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Nash, Noncooperative games, Annals of Mathematics 54 (1951) 289-295.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. Shapley, A value for n-person games, in: The Shapley Value-Essays in Honor of Lloyd S. Shapley, ed. A.E. Roth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988) pp. 31-40.

    Google Scholar 

  24. United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982, UN Doc. A/Conf. 61/122, 1982.

  25. United Nations Conference on Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks. Agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks, Sixth session, New York, 24 July-4 August, 1995. United Nations, A/CONF. 164/37, 8 September 1995.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bjørndal, T., Kaitala, V., Lindroos, M. et al. The management of high seas fisheries. Annals of Operations Research 94, 183–196 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018925302021

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018925302021

Navigation