Skip to main content
Log in

Sexual dimorphism in proconsul

  • Published:
Human Evolution

Abstract

One of the more important sources of variability in primate species is sexual dimorphism. Most Primates heavier than five kilos bodyweight are sexually dimorphic, both in body size and in shape of certain hard tissues. Despite these facts, most of the fossil Primates from East African Miocene deposits were originally perceived as being monomorphic, a perception which has propogated through the literature. Re-examination ofProconsul from various sites in Western Kenya results in the view that it was as dimorphic in its splanchonocranium and in bodyweight as chimpanzees and gorillas. The clearest evidence comes from Rusing Island, where adequate samples are known of two morphs, traditionally identified as two species, but more likely to represent two sexes of a single species,P. nyanzae. Co-occurrence of the two morphs is 100% at the various Rusinga sites. Less complete samples have been collected from the Tinderet sites os Koru and Songhor, yet what is available shows that similar patterns of dimorphism characterise the speciesP. africanus andP. major, and that the co-occurrence of the two morphs in each species is 100%. The identification of fossils taking into consideration the role of sexual dimorphism clarifies many of the old debates in which individual specimens frequently shifted between different species, mainly on the basis of metric rather than morphologic evidence. Consequently, the distribution of the species ofProconsul is rather different after accounting for dimorphism, than it was before.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews P. J., 1978.A revision of the Miocene Hominoidea of East Africa. Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Geol., 30 (2): 85–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews P. J., 1981.Species diversity and diet in monkeys and apes during the Miocene. In C. B. Stringer (ed). Aspects of Human Evolution London. Taylor and Francis, 25–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews P. J. &Van Couvering J. A. H., 1975.Palaeoenvironments in the East African Miocene. In H. Kuhnet al. (eds). Contributions to Primatology Basel, S. Karger, 5: 62–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews P. J. & Walker A., 1976.The Primate and other fauna from Fort Ternan, Kenya. In G. Isaac & E. McCown (eds). Human Origins: Louis Leakey and the East African Evidence Menlo, Univ. California Press: 279–304.

  • Ashton E. H. &Zuckerman S., 1950.Some quantitative dental characteristics of the chimpazee, gorilla and orangutan. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, 234 (B): 471–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonis L. de, & Melentis J., 1984.La position phyletique d’Ouranopithecus. In P. Andrews & J. Franzen (eds). The early evolution of man. Cour. Forsch. Inst. Senckenberg Frankfurt, 69: 13–23.

  • Bosler W., 1981.Species groupings of early Miocene Dryopithecine teeth from East Africa. Jl Human Evol., 10: 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesters K. I. M., 1957.The Miocene flora of Rusinga Island, Lake Victoria, Kenya. Palaeontographica, 101 (B): 30–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day M., 1977.Guide to fossil man; A handbook of human palaeontology. London, Cassel, 3rd edition; 1–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake R., Van Couvering J. A., Pickford M. & Curtis G., in prep.K-Ar geochronology of early Miocene volcanic strata and associated vertebrate and early hominoid fossil localities: Rusinga and Mfwangano Islands, Uyoma Peninsula and Karungu-Western Kenya.

  • Fleagle J., Kay R. &Simons E. L., 1980.Sexual dimorphism in early anthropoids. Nature, 287: 328–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch J., 1963.Sexual dimorphism in canines of Hylobates lar. Primates, 4: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garn S. M., Lewis A. B., Swindler D. R. &Kerewsky R. S., 1967.Genetic control of sexual dimorphism in tooth size. Jl. Dental Res., 46: 963–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich P. D., 1972.Correlation of tooth size and body size in living hominoid primates, with a note on relative brain size in Aegyptopithecus and Proconsul. Amer. Jl. Phys. Anthropol., 47: 395–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield L. O., 1972.Sexual dimorphisms in Dryopithecus africanus. Primates. 13: 395–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield L. O., 1973.Note on the placement of the most complete Kenyapithecus africanus mandible. Folia Primat, 20: 274–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield L. O., 1978.On the dental arcade reconstructions of Ramapithecus. Jl. Human. Evol., 7: 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield L. O., 1979.On the adaptive pattern of Ramapithecus. Am. Jl. Phys. Anthropol., 50: 527–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison T., 1982.Small-bodied apes from the Miocene of East Africa. PhD Thesis. Univ. London: 1–647.

  • Hopwood A. T., 1933.Miocene primates from British East Africa. Zool. Jl. Linn. Soc., 38: 437–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay R. F., 1982.Sexual dimorphism in Ramapithecinae. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 79: 209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keith A., 1932.Africa. Man, 32: 208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent P. E., 1944.The Miocene beds of Kavirondo, Kenya. Quart. Jl. Geol. Soc. London, 100: 85–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey L. S. B., 1962.A new lower Pliocene fossil primate from Kenya. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., 13: 689–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leakey L. S. B., 1967.An early Miocene member of Hominidae. Nature, 213: 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey L. S. B., 1968.Lower dentition of Kenyapithecus africanus. Nature, 217: 827–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Gros Clark W. E. &Leakey L. S. B., 1950.Diagnosis of East African Miocene Hominoidea. Quart. Jl. Geol. Soc. London, 105: 260–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Gros Clark W. E. &Leakey L. S. B., 1951.The Miocene Hominoidea of East Africa. Foss. Mamm. Afr., 1: 1–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger W., 1970.Das Becken der rezenten Primaten. Gegenbaurs morph. Jb., 115: 1–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger W., 1972.Beziehungen zwischen der Neugeborenengrosse und dem sexualdimorphism am becken bei simischen Primaten. Folia Primat., 12: 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger W., 1978.Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body size and breeding system in primates. Nature, 272: 610–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger W. &Kelly J. T.: 1977.Relationships of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioural and ecological correlates in anthropoid primates. Primates, 18: 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas P. W., 1982.An analysis of the canine tooth size of Old World higher Primates in relation to mandibular length and body weight. Archs Oral Biol., 27: 493–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacInnes D. G., 1943.Notes on the East African Miocene Primates. Jl. E. Afr. Uganda Nat. Hist. Soc., 17: 141–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin S. M. &Bruce M. F., 1984.Sex determination from the pelvis of dutch skeletal series. Proc. Anat. Soc. Gr. Brit. Ireland, Dec. 1984: 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin L., 1981.New specimens of Proconsul from Koru, Kenya. Jl. Human Evol., 10: 139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobb J. &Wood B., 1977.Allometry and sexual dimorphism in the primate innominate bone. Amer. Jl. Anat., 150: 531–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napier J. & Napier P., 1985.The natural history of the primates. London, Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.): 1–200.

  • Oxnard C. E., 1983.Sexual dimorphisms in the overall proportions of primates. Amer. Jl. Primatol., 4: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickford M., 1981.Preliminary Miocene mammalian biostratigraphy for Western Kenya. Jl. Human Evol., 10: 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickford M., 1983.Sequence and environments of lower and middle Miocene hominoids in Western Kenya. In Ciochon R. & Corruccini R. (eds.). New interpretations of ape and human ancestry. New York, Plenum: 421–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickford M., 1985.A new look at Kenyapithecus based on recent discoveries in Western Kenya. Jl. Human Evol., 14: 113–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam D., 1969.Tertiary Pongidae of East Africa: Evolutionary relationships and taxonomy. Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist., 31: 1–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remane A., 1965.Die Geschichte der Menschaffen. In Menschliche Abstammungslehre. Stuttgart, Gustav Fischer Verlag: 249–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz A., 1963.Age changes, sex differences and variability as factors in the classification of primates. In S. Tax (ed.). Classification and Human Evolution. Viking Fund. Publ. Anthropol., 37: 85–115.

  • Schultz A., 1969.The life of Primates. New York, Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons E. L. &Pilbeam D. R., 1965.Preliminary revision of the Dryopithecinae (Pongidae, Anthropoidea). Folia Primatol, 3: 81–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdcourt B., 1963.The Miocene non-marine Mollusca of Rusinga Island, Lake Victoria and other localities in Kenya. Palaeontographica, 121A: 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker A. &Pickford M., 1983.New postcranial fossils of Proconsul africanus and Proconsul nyanzae. In Ciochon R. & Corruccini R. (eds.). New interpretations of ape and human ancestry. New York, Plenum: 325–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitworth T., 1958.Miocene ruminants of East Africa. Foss. Mamm. Afr., 15: 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu R. &Oxnard C. E., 1983.Ramapithecines from China: evidence from dimensions of teeth. Nature, 306: 258–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu R. &Oxnard C. E., 1983.Ramapithecus and Sivapithecus from China: some implication for higher primate evolution. Amer. Jl. Primatol, 5: 303–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwell M., 1972.On the supposed Kenyapithecus africanus mandible. Nature, 240: 236–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pickford, M. Sexual dimorphism in proconsul. Hum. Evol. 1, 111–148 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437490

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437490

Key words

Navigation