Skip to main content
Log in

A program for editing of community data matrices

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Editing of community data matrices is complementary to analyzing data by multivariate techniques of classification and ordination in the overall task of data analysis. A computer program, DATAEDIT, is described that can perform numerous editing functions, including data transformation, deletion of certain species or samples, deletion of rare species, deletion of outliers, separation of disjunet sample groups, reordering of the species or samples of a data matrix, and the formation of composite samples or of sample subsets. DATAEDIT can use the information in a nonhierarchical or hierarchical classification, and includes its own internal routine for reciprocal averaging ordination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, M. P. & Belbin, L., 1980. The Application of the Twostop Algorithm to Two Floristie Data Sets. Inst. of Earth Resources, CSIRO, Canberra. 7 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, M. P. & Greig-Smith, P., 1968. The application of quantitative methods to vegetation survey. II. Some methodological probiems of data from rain forest. J. Ecol. 56: 827–844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. B. & Curtis, J. T., 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communlties of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27: 325–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., 1977. GRDIFLEX a Flexible Computer Program of Four Ordination Techniques: Weighted Averages, Polar Ordination, Prineipal Components Analysis, and Reciprocal Averaging, Relcase B. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853. 185 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., 1979. COMPCLUS a FORTRAN Program for Rapid Initial Clustering of Large Data Sets. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853. 59 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., 1982. Multivariate Analysis in Community Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G., Whittaker, R. H. & Wentworth, T. R., 1977. A comparative study of reciprocal averaging and other ordination techniques. J. Ecol. 65: 157–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goff, F. G., 1975. Comparison of species ordinations resulting from alternative indices of interspccific association and different numbers of included species. Vegetation 31: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. H., 1980. Multivariate approaches in ecology the assessment of acologic similarity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. and Syst. 11: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O., 1979a. DECORANA a FORTRAN Program for Detrerded Correspondence Analysis and Reciprocal Averaging. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, 52 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O., 1979b. TWINSPAN a FORTRAN Program for Arranging Multivariate Data in án Ordered Two-way Table by Classification of the Individuals and Attributes. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca. New York 14853, 90 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. O. & Gauch, H. G., 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, B., Huntley, J. P. & Birks, H. J. B., 1981. PHYVTOPAK a suite of computer programs designed for the handling and analysis of phytosociological data. Vegetatie 45: 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E.van der, 1979. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community simllarity. Vegetatio 39: 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I., Walker, D., & Williams, W. T., 1975. Data transformations in ecological ordination. II. On the mesning of data standardization. J. Ecol. 63: 779–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L., 1978. Multivariate Analysis in Vegetation Research. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. & Makkattu, M. M., 1973. The effect of species number and type of data on the resemblance structure of a phytosociological collection. J. Ecol. 61: 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R. K., 1980. Ordination as a tool for analyzing complex data sets. Vegetatio 42: 171–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, S. B. & Gauch, H. G., 1979. CONDENSE Convert Data Matrices from any ORDIFLEX Format into a Condensed Format by Samples. Ecology and Systematics. Cornell University, Ithaea, New York 14853. 7 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildi, O., 1980. Management and multivariate analysis of large data sets in vegetation research. Vegetatio 42: 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We appreciate valuable suggestions from the late Robert H. Whittaker, and from Philip Dixon, David Hieks, Laura Huenneke, Linda Olsvig-whittaker, and Mark Wilson. Mark O. Hill kindly supplied a fast subroutine for reciprocal averaging.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gauch, H.G., Singer, S.B. A program for editing of community data matrices. Vegetatio 49, 187–190 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123843

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123843

Keywords

Navigation