Summary
For the description of patterns in data from quadrats arranged in a belt or grid, a new ‘paired-quadrat variance’ (PQV) method is introduced. This and other published methods were applied to artificial data with known patterns and to two sets of field data. Hypotheses formed by other methods about patterns shown in the field data are tested by Goodall's method involving ‘random pairing of quadrats to obtain variances’ (RPQV). The advantages of using the PQV method and Hill's new ‘two-term local quadrat variance’ (TTLQV) method over the earlier ‘blocked-quadrat variance’ (BQV) methods are discussed. It is recommended that quadrat data be divided into two subsets, and then the PQV method be applied to one and the RPQV method to the other. This new procedure for spatial pattern analysis would permit the separation of hypothesis formation (by the PQV method) from hypothesis testing (by the RPQV method), and would permit unambiguous significance tests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AshbyE. 1936. Statistical ecology. Bot. Rev. 2: 221–235.
AshbyE. 1948. Statistical ecology. II—A reassessment. Bot. Rev. 14: 222–234.
BartlettM. S. 1964. The spectral analysis of two-dimensional point processes. Biometrika 51: 299–311.
Burden, P.C. 1970. Field and computer studies in the pattern of some calcicolous plants. B.A. Thesis, University of York, York.
ErringtonJ.C. 1973. The effect of regular and random distributions on the analysis of pattern. J. Ecol. 61: 99–105.
GoodallD.W. 1952. Quantitative aspects of plant distribution. Biol. Rev. 27: 194–245.
Goodall, D. W. 1954. Minimal area: a new approach. VIIth Internat. Bot. Congr., Rapp. Comm. parv. avant le Cong., Sect. 7, Ecologic, 19–21.
GoodallD.W. 1961. Objective methods for classification of vegetation. IV. Pattern and minimal area. Aust. J. Bot. 9: 162–196.
GoodallD.W. 1963. Pattern analysis and minimal area — some further comments. J. Ecol. 51: 705–710.
GoodallD.W. 1970. Statistical plant ecology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1: 99–124.
GoodallD.W. 1974. A new method for the analysis of spatial pattern by random pairing of quadrats. Vegetatio 29: 135–146.
Greig-SmithP. 1952. The use of random and contiguous quadrats in the study of the structure of plant communities. Ann. Bot. Lond. n.s. 16: 293–316.
Greig-SmithP. 1961. Data on pattern within Plant communities. I. The analysis of pattern. J. Ecol. 49: 695–702.
Greig-SmithP. 1964. Quantitative Plant Ecology. 2nd. ed. Butterworth, London, 256 pp.
Greig-SmithP. & M.J.Chadwick. 1965. Data on pattern within plant communities. III. Acacia-Capparis semi-desert serub in the Sudan. J. Ecol. 53: 465–474.
HillM.O. 1973. The intensity of spatial pattern in plant communities. J. Ecol. 61: 225–235.
Johnson, R.W. 1973. A study of some multivariate methods for the analysis of botanical data. Ph.D. Dissertation, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. 356 pp.
KershawK.A. 1957. The use of cover and frequency in the detection of pattern in plant communities. Ecology 38: 291–299.
KershawK.A. 1964. Quantitative and Dynamic Ecology. Edward Arnold (Publ.) Ltd., London, 183 pp.
MeadR. 1974. A test for spatial pattern at several scales using data from a grid of contiguous quadrats. Biometrics 30: 295–307.
PielouE.C. 1969. An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 286 pp.
ThompsonH.R. 1958. The statistical study of plant distribution patterns using a grid of quadrats. Aust. J. Bot. 6: 322–342.
UsherM.B. 1969. The relation between mean square and block size in the analysis of similar patterns. J. Ecol. 57: 505–514.
UsherM.B. 1975. Analysis of pattern in real and artificial plant populations. J. Ecol. 63: 569–586.
WilliamsW.T. (Ed.) 1976. Pattern Analysis in Agrieultural Science. CSIRO, Melbourne, Elsevier Sci. Publ., Amsterdam, 331 pp.
WilliamsW.T., & M.B.Dale. 1962. Partitioned correlation matrices for heterogeneous data. Nature, Lond. 196: 602–603.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Nomenclature of Australian species follows Black, J.M. 1957–1964 Flora of South Australia (2nd edition). Government Printer, Adelaide.
This research was performed while on sabbatical leave from The Biology Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, USA.
We are indebted to our colleagues in the Division of Land Resources Management for their stimulating support, to Helen Warrener for secretarial assistance, and to Drs Mike Austin, Jonathan Majer, Imanuel Noy-Neir, David Jupp and Jim Watson for comments on the paper in draft.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ludwig, J.A., Goodall, D.W. A comparison of paired- with blocked-quadrat variance methods for the analysis of spatial pattern. Vegetatio 38, 49–59 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141298
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141298