Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of paired- with blocked-quadrat variance methods for the analysis of spatial pattern

  • Published:
Vegetatio Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

For the description of patterns in data from quadrats arranged in a belt or grid, a new ‘paired-quadrat variance’ (PQV) method is introduced. This and other published methods were applied to artificial data with known patterns and to two sets of field data. Hypotheses formed by other methods about patterns shown in the field data are tested by Goodall's method involving ‘random pairing of quadrats to obtain variances’ (RPQV). The advantages of using the PQV method and Hill's new ‘two-term local quadrat variance’ (TTLQV) method over the earlier ‘blocked-quadrat variance’ (BQV) methods are discussed. It is recommended that quadrat data be divided into two subsets, and then the PQV method be applied to one and the RPQV method to the other. This new procedure for spatial pattern analysis would permit the separation of hypothesis formation (by the PQV method) from hypothesis testing (by the RPQV method), and would permit unambiguous significance tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AshbyE. 1936. Statistical ecology. Bot. Rev. 2: 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • AshbyE. 1948. Statistical ecology. II—A reassessment. Bot. Rev. 14: 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • BartlettM. S. 1964. The spectral analysis of two-dimensional point processes. Biometrika 51: 299–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burden, P.C. 1970. Field and computer studies in the pattern of some calcicolous plants. B.A. Thesis, University of York, York.

  • ErringtonJ.C. 1973. The effect of regular and random distributions on the analysis of pattern. J. Ecol. 61: 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoodallD.W. 1952. Quantitative aspects of plant distribution. Biol. Rev. 27: 194–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, D. W. 1954. Minimal area: a new approach. VIIth Internat. Bot. Congr., Rapp. Comm. parv. avant le Cong., Sect. 7, Ecologic, 19–21.

  • GoodallD.W. 1961. Objective methods for classification of vegetation. IV. Pattern and minimal area. Aust. J. Bot. 9: 162–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoodallD.W. 1963. Pattern analysis and minimal area — some further comments. J. Ecol. 51: 705–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoodallD.W. 1970. Statistical plant ecology. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1: 99–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • GoodallD.W. 1974. A new method for the analysis of spatial pattern by random pairing of quadrats. Vegetatio 29: 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-SmithP. 1952. The use of random and contiguous quadrats in the study of the structure of plant communities. Ann. Bot. Lond. n.s. 16: 293–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-SmithP. 1961. Data on pattern within Plant communities. I. The analysis of pattern. J. Ecol. 49: 695–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-SmithP. 1964. Quantitative Plant Ecology. 2nd. ed. Butterworth, London, 256 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greig-SmithP. & M.J.Chadwick. 1965. Data on pattern within plant communities. III. Acacia-Capparis semi-desert serub in the Sudan. J. Ecol. 53: 465–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • HillM.O. 1973. The intensity of spatial pattern in plant communities. J. Ecol. 61: 225–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.W. 1973. A study of some multivariate methods for the analysis of botanical data. Ph.D. Dissertation, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. 356 pp.

  • KershawK.A. 1957. The use of cover and frequency in the detection of pattern in plant communities. Ecology 38: 291–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • KershawK.A. 1964. Quantitative and Dynamic Ecology. Edward Arnold (Publ.) Ltd., London, 183 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • MeadR. 1974. A test for spatial pattern at several scales using data from a grid of contiguous quadrats. Biometrics 30: 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • PielouE.C. 1969. An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 286 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ThompsonH.R. 1958. The statistical study of plant distribution patterns using a grid of quadrats. Aust. J. Bot. 6: 322–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • UsherM.B. 1969. The relation between mean square and block size in the analysis of similar patterns. J. Ecol. 57: 505–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • UsherM.B. 1975. Analysis of pattern in real and artificial plant populations. J. Ecol. 63: 569–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • WilliamsW.T. (Ed.) 1976. Pattern Analysis in Agrieultural Science. CSIRO, Melbourne, Elsevier Sci. Publ., Amsterdam, 331 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • WilliamsW.T., & M.B.Dale. 1962. Partitioned correlation matrices for heterogeneous data. Nature, Lond. 196: 602–603.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Nomenclature of Australian species follows Black, J.M. 1957–1964 Flora of South Australia (2nd edition). Government Printer, Adelaide.

This research was performed while on sabbatical leave from The Biology Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, USA.

We are indebted to our colleagues in the Division of Land Resources Management for their stimulating support, to Helen Warrener for secretarial assistance, and to Drs Mike Austin, Jonathan Majer, Imanuel Noy-Neir, David Jupp and Jim Watson for comments on the paper in draft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ludwig, J.A., Goodall, D.W. A comparison of paired- with blocked-quadrat variance methods for the analysis of spatial pattern. Vegetatio 38, 49–59 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141298

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141298

Keywords

Navigation