Skip to main content
Log in

Using History to Teach Invention and Design: The Case of the Telephone

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper shows how a historical case, the invention of the telephone, can be used to teach invention and design in a way that combines engineering, social sciences, and humanities. The historical problem of transmitting speech was turned into an active learning module, in which students sought to improve patents obtained by early telephone inventors like Alexander Graham Bell and Elisha Gray, using equipment similar to what was available at the time. The result was a collaborative learning environment in which students from a wide range of majors worked in teams, eventually producing a patent application. As part of the project, they were allowed to search historical materials like the Bell notebooks, which were made available on line. This experience gave them a better understanding of the invention and design process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • 1880, The Telephone Suits: Bell Telephone Company Et Al. v. Peter A. Dowd, Part II: Exhibits of Complainants and Defendant., Alfred Judge & Son, Law Printers, Boston.

  • Albano, A.M.: 1990. 'Morse and the Beginnings of Telegraphy'. in David P. Billington and Alphonse M. Albano (eds.), Episodes in American Invention: The Steamboat and the Telegraph. J. Wayman Williams Associates, Basking Ridge, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, N.: 1995, Edison: Inventing the Century, Hyperion, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basalla, G.: 1988, The Evolution of Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A.G.: 1876b, 'Experiments Made by A. Graham Bell', (Vol. I,): Bell Family Papers, Library of Congress.

  • Bell, A.G.: 1908, The Bell Telephone: Deposition of Alexander Graham Bell, American Bell Telephone Co., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, R.V.: 1973, Bell: Alexander Graham Bell and the Conquest of Solitude, Little Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J., Goodnow, J., & Austin, G.: 1956, A Study of Thinking, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, G., Gooding, D., & Jamcs, F.A.J.L.: 1996, Michael Faraday, Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, W.B., & Gorman, M.E.: 1992, 'A Cognitive Framework to Understand Technological Creativity: Bell, Edison, and the Telephone', in R.J.P. Weber, D. N. (ed.), Inventive Minds: Creativity in Technology, Oxford University Press, pp. pp. 48–79.

  • Carlson, W.B., & Gorman, M.E: 1989, 'Thinking and Doing at Menio Park: Edison's Development of the Telephone, 1876–1878S, in W. Pretzer (ed.), Thomas Edison's Menlo Park Laboratory, Wayne State University Press.

  • Chou, D.-L., & Calkins, D.E. (eds.): 1994, ECSEL: Introduction to Design Engineering Active Learning Modules: A Catalogue, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington Copy Services, Scattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, M.J., & Linn, M.C.: 1996, Designing Pascal Solutions: Case-Studies Using Data Structures, Computer Science Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H.M.: 1985, Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice, Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H.M.: 1990, Artificial Experts, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, T.: 1992, 'Why Wilbur and Orville'?, in R.J. Weber & D.N. Perkins (eds.), Inventive Minds, Oxford University Press, pp. 80–92.

  • Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A.: 1984, Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E.S.: 1992, Engineering and the Mind's Eye, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, N.: March 1995, 'Teaching with Cases', ASEE Prism, 16–20.

  • Gardner, H.: 1983, Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, G.K.: March 28, 1991, 'Bell and Edison (A)', in S.C. Wheelwright (ed.), Harvard Business School, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, D.: 1990, Experiment and the Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation and Experiment, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, D., & Addis, T.: 1990, Towards a Dynamical Representation of Experimental Procedures, Paper presented at the Rediscovering Skill in Science, Technology and Medicine Conference, Bath, UK.

  • Gooding, D.C., & Addis, T.R.: 1993, Modelling Faraday's Experiments with Visual Functional Programming 1: Models, Methods and Examples, Joint Research Councils' Initiative on Cognitive Science & Human Computer Interaction Special Project Grant #9107137.

  • Gorman, M.E.: 1986, 'Falsification in Experimental and Classroom Simulations', School Science and Mathematics 86(4), 306–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M.E., & Carlson, W. B.: 1990, 'Interpreting Invention as a Cognitive Process: The Case of Alexander Graham Bell, Thomas Edison and the Telephone', Science, Technology and Human Values, 15, 131–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M.E.: 1992, Simulating Science: Heuristics, Mental Models and Technoscientific Thinking, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M.E.: In Press, 'Mind in the World: Cognition and Practice in the Invention of the Telephone', Social Studies of Science.

  • Gorman, M.E., Mehalik, M.M., Carlson, W.B., & Oblon, M.: 1993, 'Alexander Graham Bell, Elisha Gray and the Speaking Telegraph: A Cognitive Comparison', History of Technology 15, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M.E., Plucker, J.A., & Callahan, C.M.: In Press, 'Turning Students into Inventors: Active Learning Modules for Secondary Students', Phi Delta Kappan.

  • Gorman, M.E., Richards, L.G., Scherer, W.T., & Kagiwada, J.K.: 1995, 'Teaching Invention and Design: Multi-Disciplinary Learning Modules', The Journal of Engineering Education 84(2), 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D.: 1991, Instrumental Realism: The Interface Between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L.: 1982, Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, (2nd ed.), Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, D.J.: 1977, The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W.: 1987, 'Confirmation, Disconfirmation and Information in Hypothesis Testing, Psychological Review 94, 211–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G.A.: 1989, 'Recognition-Primed Decisions', in W.B. Rouse (ed.), Advances in Man-machine Systems Research (Vol. 5), JAI Press, pp. 47–92.

  • Kolodner, J.L.: 1991, 'Improving human Decision Making through Case-Based Decision Aiding', AI Magazine (Summer), pp. 52–68.

  • Kroes, P.: 1995, Technology and Science-Based Heuristics, in J.C. Pitt (ed.), New Directions in the Philosophy of Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995, pp. 17–39.

  • Lakatos, I.: 1978, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, D., & Spinardi, G.: 1995, 'Tacit Knowledge, Weapons Design, and the Uninvention of Nuclear Weapons', 101(1), 44–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.R.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science,: Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J.C.: 1890, The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, Dover Publications, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A.: 1993, Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine, Addison Wesley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroski, H.: 1994, Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in engineering: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.: 1986, The Making of the Atomic Bomb, Simon & Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., McGinn, M.K., & Bowen, G.M.: 1996, 'Technology studies: Effecting Change in Science Education', Science, Technology and Human Values 21(4), 454–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauble, L., Klopfer, L.E., & Raghavan, K.: 1991, 'Student's Transition from an Engineering Model to a Science Model of Experimentation, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28(9), 859–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1981, The Sciences of the Artificial, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I.D.: 1972, Group Process and Productivity, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P.C.: 1960, 'On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual task, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 12, 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R.J., & Perkins, D.N.: 1989, 'How to Invent Artifacts and Ideas', New Ideas in Psychology 7, 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R.J.: 1992, Forks, Phonographs, and Hot Air Balloons: A Field Guide to Inventive Thinking, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N.: 1993, Invention: The Care and Feeding of Ideas, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gorman, M.E., Robinson, J.K. Using History to Teach Invention and Design: The Case of the Telephone. Science & Education 7, 173–201 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008634315698

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008634315698

Keywords

Navigation