Skip to main content
Log in

More on the nature of scientific thought: Responses to Professors Lederman and Ohlsson

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

These comments are responses to the papers of Professors Lederman and Ohlsson published inScience & Education Vol. 4, No. 4, 1995. Their papers advanced comments on, and criticisms of, my paper ‘On the Nature of Scientific Thought’ (Science & Education Vol. 4, No. 1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BachelardG.: 1938,La formation de ésprit scientifique. Contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance objective, J. Vrin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • BachelardG.: 1964 [1938],The Psychoanalysis of Fire, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • BuchdahlG.: 1993 ‘Styles of Scientific Thinking’,Science & Education 2, 149–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • CrombieA.C.: 1994,Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Trandition, 3 Vols, Duck-worth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeweyJ.: 1938,Logic. The Theory of Inquiry, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • FreudenthalG.: 1986,Atom and Individual in the Age of Newton, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • FreudenthalG.: 1988, ‘Towards a Social History of Newtonian Mechanics. Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann Revisited’, in I.Hronszky, M.Feher & B.Dajka (eds.),Scientific Knowledge Socialized, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • GouldS.J.: 1989,Wonderful Life. The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History, W.W. Norton, New York/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • KellertS.H.: 1993,In the Wake of Chaos. Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems, University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • MillerR.W.: 1987,Fact and Method. Explanation, Confirmation and Reality in the Natural and the Social Sciences, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • MittelstrassJ.: 1962,Die Rettung der Phänomene. Ursprung und Geschichte eines antiken Forschungsprinzips, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • MorsonG.S. & EmersonC.: 1990,Mikhail Bakhtin. Creation of a Prosaics, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • NicklesT.: 1989, ‘Justification & Experiment’, in D.Gooding et al. (eds.),The Uses of Experiment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 299–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • SoberE.: 1988,Reconstructing the Past, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass./London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W.: 1997, ‘Reflections on Peter Slezak and “Sociology of Knowledge”’,Science & Education 6 (forthcoming).

  • ValéryP.: 1932,Moralités, Gallimard, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanFraassenB.C.: 1980,The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • WallaceW.A.: 1974,Causality and Scientific Explanation, 2 Vols, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • WolpertL.: 1992,The Unnatural Nature of Science, Faber & Faber, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suchting, W.A. More on the nature of scientific thought: Responses to Professors Lederman and Ohlsson. Sci Educ 5, 381–390 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00625608

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00625608

Keywords

Navigation