Skip to main content
Log in

Notes on the cultural significance of the sciences

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

‘Cultural’ in the title is intended to allude to the bearing of the sciences on humanity's general orientation in the world. Questions about this are distinguished from ones about the sciences' instrumental aspect, as means to ends extrinsic to them qua sciences, and also from ones about their intrinsic character, except to the extent that these bear on the central topic of the paper. It is argued that the sciences, ethical/moral reflection and the arts are distinct but inseparable. The sciences may be regarded as ‘first among equals’ substantively, insofar they are a privileged source of a certain specially important sort of factual knowledge, and, methodologically, insofar as they provide a particularly clear model for understanding a purely naturalistic approach to the world.

...Ulrich...loved mathematics because of the people who could not endure it. He was not so much scientifically as humanly in love with science...many people for whom mathematics or natural science is a job feel it is almost an outrage if someone goes in for science for reasons like [his]. ...[He]...hated...all those who give up half-way, the faint-hearted, the soft, those who comfort their souls with flummery about the soul and who feed it, because the intellect allegedly gives it stones instead of bread, on religious, philosophical and fictitious emotions, which are like buns soaked in milk. ...soul is...easily defined negatively: it is simply what curls up and hides when there is any mention of an algebraic series.

Robert Musil, The Man Without Qualities, Bk. I, Chs. 11, 13, 25.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackermann, R. J.: 1985, Data, Instruments and Theory. A Dialectical Approach to Understanding Science, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.: 1973, Philosophische Terminologie, Bd 1, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T.: 1986, Mahler. Eine musikalische Physiognomik, in Die musikalischen Monographien, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, J.: 1964, ‘The Nature of Scientific Problems and their Roots in Philosophy’, in M. Bunge (ed.), The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy, Free Press, Glencoe, 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L.: 1969, For Marx, Allen Lane, The Penguin Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L.: 1971, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, New Left Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L.: 1976, Essays in Self-Criticism, NLB, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L.: 1990, Philosophy and the Spontaneous Philosophy of the Scientists, Verso, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, L. and Balibar, E.: 1970, Reading Capital, New Left Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, B.: 1992, Understanding the Present. Science and the Soul of Modern Man, Picador, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. M.: 1968, A Materialist Theory of the Mind, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, S.: 1988, Science and Power. Discourse and Ideology in Modern Society, University of Minneapolis Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G: 1986, The New Scientific Spirit, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G.: 1938, La Formation de l'esprit scientifique, Vrin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G.: 1949, Le Rationalisme appliqué, P. U. F., Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G.: 1951, L'Activité rationaliste de la physique contemporaine, P. U. F., Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G.: 1953, Le Matérialisme rationnel, P. U. F., Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G.: 1969, The Poetics of Space, Boston, Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M.: 1981, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M.: 1984, Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M.: 1986, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, E.: 1978, ‘From Bachelard to Althusser: the Concept of “Epistemological Break”’, Economy and Society 7, 207–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balser, W., Molines, C. U., Sneed, J. D.: 1987, An Architectonic for Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltas, A.: 1987, ‘Ideological “Assumptions” in Physics: Social Determinations of Internal Structures’, in A. Fine and P. Machamer (eds.) ‘Philosophy of Science Association 1986, Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltas, A.: 1988, ‘On the Structure of Physics as a Science’, in D. Batens and J. P. van Bendegam (eds.), Theory and Experiment, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 207–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltas, A.: Forthcoming, ‘Physics as a Mode of Production’, Science in Context.

  • Bloch, E.: 1986, Principle of Hope, 3 vols, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, H.: 1983, The Legitimacy of the Modern Age, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass..

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, H.: 1985, Work on Myth, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass..

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, H.: 1987, Das Lachen der Thakerin. Eine Urgeschichte der Theorie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, G. (ed.): 1976, Protophysik. Für und wider eine konstruktive Wissenschaftstheorie der Physik, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, G., van den Daele, W. and Krohn, W.: 1977, Experimentelle Philosophie. Ursprünge autonomer Wissenschaftsentwicklung, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P.: 1977, Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramly, S.: 1991, Leonardo. Discovering the Life of Leonardo da Vinci, Edward Burlingame Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecht, B.: 1974, On Theatre. The Development of an Aesthetic (ed. and tr. J. Willett), Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer, J. and Roodenburg, H. (eds.): 1992, A Cultural History of Gesture: From Antiquity to the Present, Polity Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P. G.: 1927, The Logic of Modern Physics, Longmans, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P. G.: 1937, The Nature of Physical Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P. G.: 1952, The Nature of Some of Our Physical Concepts, Philosophical Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, C.: 1959, A History of Western Morals, Harcourt Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronowski, J.: 1954, William Blake 1727–1827. A Man Without a Mask (2nd ed.), Pelican.

  • Butts, R. E. and Brown, J. (eds.): 1989, Construction and Science. Essays in Recent German Philosophy, Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilhem, G.: 1970, ‘Galilée: La Signification de l'oeuvre et la leçon de l'homme’ in Etudes d'Histoire et de philosophie des sciences (2nd ed.), Vrin, Paris, 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1922, Der Raum. Ein Beitrag zur Wissenschaftslehre, Kant-Studien, Ergänzungshefte 56, Verlag von Reuther & Reichard, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1926, Physikalische Begriffsbildung, G. Braun, Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1967, The Logical Construction of the World, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1989, Nature's Capacities and their Measurement, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E.: 1922, Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit, Vols I and II (3rd ed.), B. Cassirer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E.: 1953, Substance and Function and Einstein's Theory of Relativity, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E.: 1921, ‘Goethe und die mathematische Physik. Eine erkenntnistheoretische Studie’, in Idee und Gestalt, B. Cassirer, Berlin, 29–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E.: 1953–1959, Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, 3 vols, Yale University Press, New Haven & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E.: 1925, ‘Die Philosophie der Griechen von den Anfängen bis Platon’, in M. Dessoir (ed.), Lehrbuch der Philosophie, Vol. I, Die Geschichte der Philosophie, Ullstein, Berlin, 1–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E.: 1969, ‘Mythic, Aesthetic and Theoretical Space’ (1931), Man and World 2, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E.: 1956, Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics. Historical and Systematic Studies of the Problem of Causality, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E.: 1961, The Logic of the Humanities, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E.: 1944, An Essay on Man. An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, O.: 1975, The Secularization of the European Mind in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, A.: 1990, Science and Its Fabrication, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar, S.: 1987, Truth and Beauty: Aesthetics and Motivations in Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G.: 1992, Space, Time and Man: A Prehistorian's View, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G.: 1938, The Principles of Art, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G.: 1940, An Essay on Metaphysics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornford, F.: 1957, From Religion to Philosophy. A Study in the Origins of Western Speculation, Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornford, F.: 1952, Principium Sapientiae, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, D. W.: 1980, The Aesthetic Dimension of Science, Philosophical Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtain, D. W. (ed.): 1982, The Aesthetic Dimension of Science, Philosophical Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curthoys, J. and Suchting, W.: 1977, ‘Feyerabend's Discourse Against Method: A Marxist Critique’, Inquiry 20, 243–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlhaus, C.: 1988, Ludwig van Beethoven und seine Zeit (2nd ed.), Laaber-Verlag, Laaber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damerow, P. and Lefèvre, W. (eds.): 1981, Rechenstein, Experiment, Sprache, Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1948, Reconstruction in Philosophy (2nd ed.), Boston:Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1929, The Quest for Certainty, Minton, Balch, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1932, Art as Experience, G. Putnam, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1938, Logic, the Theory of Inquiry, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J.: 1991, The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee, Radius, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingler, H.: 1928, Das Experiment. Sein Wesen und seine Geschichte, Ernst Rinehardt, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingler, H.: 1938, Die Methode der Physik, Ernst Rinehardt, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingler, H.: 1969, Die Ergreifung des Wirklichen Kapitel I–IV, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L. and Harris, H.: 1986, Empiricism, Explanation and Rationality. An Introduction to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1954, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dux, G.: 1976, Strukturwandel der Legitimation, Freiburg/Munich, Karl Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dux, G.: 1982, Die Logik der Weltbilder. Sinnstrukturen im Wandel der Geschichte, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Dux, G.: 1989, Die Zeit in der Geschichte. Ihre Entwicklungslogik vom Mythos zur Weltzeit, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddington, A. S.: 1939, The Philosophy of Physical Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. M.: 1987, Neural Darwinism. The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, S. Y., Jr.: 1991, The Heritage of Giotto's Geometry. Art and Science on the Eve of the Scientific Revolution, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenius, A. (ed.): 1985, The Natural Sciences and the Arts: Aspects of Interaction from the Renaissance to the Twentieth Century, Almqvist & Wiksell, Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B.: 1990, Truth and Objectivity, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Else, G. F.: 1965, The Origin and Early Form of Greek Tragedy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Empson, W.: 1930, Seven Types of Ambiguity, Hogarth Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K.: 1967, ‘The Theatre as an Instrument for the Criticism of Ideologies: Notes on Ionesco’, Inquiry 10, 298–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K.: 1975, Against Method. Outline of an Anarchist Theory of Knowledge, NLB, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K.: 1978, Science in a Free Society, NLB, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K.: 1981, Philosophical Papers, 2 vols, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K.: 1987, Farewell to Reason, Verso, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. P.: 1992, The Character of Physical Law, Penguin.

  • Fleck, L.: 1979, The Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (1935), Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. et al.: 1949, Before Philosophy. The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man. Pelican.

  • Freud, S.: 1966 ff., The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works, J. Strachey et al. (eds.), The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.

  • Freudenthal, G.: 1986, Atom and Individual in the Age of Newton, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, G.: 1988, ‘Towards a Social History of Newtonian Mechanics. Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossmann Revisited’, in I. Hronszky, M. Feher, B. Dajka (eds.), Scientific Knowledge Socialized, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 193–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D.: 1929, Gotik und Renaissance als Grundlagen der modernen Weltanschauung, B. Filser, Augsburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, K. von: 1962, Antike und Moderne Tragödie. Neun Abhandlungen, W. de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G.: 1975, Truth and Method, Sheed and Ward, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G.: 1986, The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, P. and Helvy, B. (eds.): 1992, Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, P.: 1966, 1969, The Enlightenment: An Interpretation, A. A. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlen, A.: 1980, Man in the Age of Technology, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlen, A.: 1988, Man. His Nature and Place in the World (1972), Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gombrich, E. K.: 1972, ‘The Visual Image’, Scientific American 227(3), 82–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, D.: 1990, Experiment and the Making of Meaning, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiff, B. von: 1976, Gesellschaftsform und Erkenntnisform. Zum Zusammenhang von wissenschaftlicher Erfahrung und gesellschaftlicher Entwicklung, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Groethuysen, B.: 1969, Philosophische Anthropologie, R. Oldenbourg, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, J. W.: 1989, In Defence of Science: Science, Technology, and Politics in Modern Society, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1983, Representing and Intervening. Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I.: 1992, ‘His Father The Engineer’, London Review of Books, 28 May.

  • Hacking, I.: 1992a, ‘Experimentation and Instrumentation in Natural Science’, in W. H. Newton-Smith and Jiang Tianji (eds.), Popper in China, Routledge, London and New York, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjinicolaou, N.: 1978, Art History and Class Struggle, Pluto Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallyn, J.: 1990, The Poetic Structure of the World: Copernicus and Kepler, Zone Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, N.: 1951, Teleologisches Denken, W. de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, A.: 1951, The Social History of Art, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, A.: 1959, The Philosophy of Art History, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, A.: 1965, Mannerism. The Crisis of the Renaissance and the Origin of Modern Art, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.: 1962, Being and Time, J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson (tr.), Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.: 1969, What is a Thing?, Henry Regnery, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M.: 1977, The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinimann, F.: 1945, Nomos und Physis. Herkunft und Bedeutung einer Antithese im Griechischen Denken des 5. Jahrhunderts, F. Reinhardt, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, A.: 1978, Das Alltagsleben. Versuch einer Erklärung der individuellen Reproduktion, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G.: 1952, Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science (International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science, 7(2)), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G.: 1988, Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein (rev. ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass..

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K.: 1968, Wissenschaft als Handlung, W. de Gruyter, Berlin & New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K.: 1986, Sinnliche Erkenntnis. Historischer Ursprung und gesellschaftliche Ursprung der Wahrnehmung (5th ed.), Athenaum, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Hübner, K.: 1978, ‘Mythische und wissenschaftliche Denkform’, Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 40, 637–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. and Wootton, D. (eds.): 1992, Atheism from the Reformation to the Enlightenment, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: 1970, The Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F.: 1981, The Political Unconscious, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M.: 1984, ‘Geometrical Perspective from Brunelleschi to Desargues: A Pictorial Means or an Intellectual End?’ Proceedings of the British Academy 70, 89–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosik, K.: 1976, Dialectics of the Concrete. A Study on Problems of Man and World, D. Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A.: 1955, ‘The Influence of Philosophic Trends on the Formulation of Scientific Theories’, Scientific Monthly, February, 107–111.

  • Kitcher, P.: 1984, The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge, Oxford University Press, London & New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristeller, P. O.: 1951–1952, ‘The Modern System of the Arts: A Study in the History of Aesthetics’, (I) (II), Journal of the History of Ideas 12, 496–527, 13, 17–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.: 1977, The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitko, H.: 1979, Wissenschaft als allgemeine Arbeit. Zur begrifflicher Grundlegung der Wissenschaftswissenschaft, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1976, Proofs and Refutations. The Logic of Mathematical Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I.: 1978, Philosophical Papers, 2 vols, J. Worrall and G. Currie (eds.), 8–101, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, S. K.: 1953, Feeling and Form. A Theory of Art Developed from ‘Philosophy in a New Key’, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laymon, R.: 1985, ‘Idealization and the Testing of Theories by Experimentation’, in P. Achinstein and O. Hannaway (eds.), Observation, Experiment, and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 147–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecourt, D.: 1975, Marxism and Epistemology. Bachelard, Canguilhem, Foucault, New Left Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecourt, D.: 1974, Bachelard ou le jour et la nuit (Un essai du matérialisme dialectique), Bernard Grasset, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H.: 1947, Critique de la vie quotidienne, Grasset, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefèvre, W.: 1978, Naturtheorie und Produktionsweise. Probleme einer materialistischen Wissenschaftsgeschichtsschreibung. Eine Studie zur Genese der neuzeitlichen Naturwissenschaft, Luchterhand, Darmstadt & Neuwied.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Grand, H. E.: 1990, Experimental Inquiries. Historical, Philosophical and Social Studies of Experimentation in Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, T.: 1988, ‘Practice, Reason, Context in the Dialogue between Theory and Experiment’, Science in Context 2, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, V. F.: 1931, The Nature of Physical Theory, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, V. F.: 1937–1938, ‘Experience and Convention’, Erkenntnis 7, 257–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, V. F.: 1938, Procedures of Empirical Science (International Encyclopaedia of Unified Science 1(5)), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen, V. F.: 1939, ‘Reason in Science’, University of California Publications in Philosophy, 21, 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K.: 1927, Gesetz und Experiment in der Psychologie, Weltkreis-Verlag, Berlin/Schlachtensee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K.: 1935, ‘The Conflict between Aristotelian and Galilean Modes of Thought in Contemporary Psychology’, in K. Lewin, A Dynamic Theory of Personality, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, H.: 1966–1971, Geschichte der Aufklärung und des Atheismus, VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, J.: 1974, Blast Power and Ballistics. Concepts of Force and Energy in the Ancient World, Frederick Muller, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G.: 1963, Aesthetik, Teil I, 1. Halbband, Luchterhand, Neuwied/Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukács, G.: 1981, Entwicklungsgeschichte des modernen Dramas, Luchterhand, Darmstadt/Neuwied.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1967, A Short History of Ethics, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIintyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue. A Study in Moral Theory, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E.: 1985, ‘Galilean Idealization’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 1, 247–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D.: 1992, Hand and Mind. What Gestures Reveal About Thought, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macherey, P.: 1978, A Theory of Literary Production, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H.: 1978, The Aesthetic Dimension. Towards a Critique of Marxist Aesthetics, Beacon Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. and Engels, F.: 1976, The German Ideology, Vol. 5 in Marx/Engels, Collected Works, Lawrence and Wishart, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M.: 1992, Science as Salvation. A Modern Myth and Its Meaning, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. W.: 1987, Fact and Method. Explanation, Confirmation and Reality in the Natural and the Social Sciences, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstrass, J.: 1962, Die Rettung der Phänomene. Ursprung und Geschichte eines antiken Forschungsprinzips, W. de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstrass, J.: 1970, Neuzeit und Aufklärung. Studien zur Entstehung der neuzeitlichen Wissenschaft und Philosophie, W. de Gruyter, Berlin & New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstrass, J.: 1972, ‘The Galilean Revolution. The Historical Fate of a Methodological Insight’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2, 297–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morson, G. S. and Emerson, C.: 1990, Mikhail Bakhtin. Creation of a Prosaics, Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscovici, S.: 1977, Essai sur l' histoire humaine de la nature (2nd ed.), Flammarion, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nestle, W.: 1941, Vom Mythos zum Logos, A. Kroner, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson, M.: 1956, Science and Imagination, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, L.: 1980, The Structure of Idealization, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pap, A.: 1946, The A Priori in Physical Theory, King's Crown Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, M.: 1971, The Making of Homeric Verse: The Collected Papers of Milman Parry, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J. A.: 1978, Science and Its Critics, Duckworth, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R. E.: 1992, Eloquent Gestures. The Transformation of Performance Style in the Griffith Biograph Films, University of California Press, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S.: 1940, Philosophical Writings, J. Buchler (ed.), Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R.: 1991, Review of Vol. 1 of The Scientific Papers and Letters of James Clerk Maxwell, London Review of Books, 26 September.

  • Perez Sanchez, A. E. and Sayre, E. A. (eds.): 1989, Goya and the Spirit of Enlightenment, Little Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (ed.): 1992, Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, J. C.: 1992, Galileo, Human Knowledge, and the Book of Nature. Method Replaces Metaphysics, Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohlenz, M.: 1953, ‘Nomos und Physis’, Hermes 81, 418–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H.: 1968, The Value of Science, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1972, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (3rd ed.), Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1966, The Open Society and its Enemies, Vol. I The Spell of Plato (5th ed.), Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1963, Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1982, Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1982a, The Open Universe. An Argument for Indeterminism, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1990, Realism With a Human Face, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass..

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P.: 1931, ‘General Propositions and Causality’ in The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Essays, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, M.: 1989, Von Monet zu Picasso. Grundzüge einer Aesthetik und Entwicklung der modernen Malerei (2nd ed.), Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, M.: 1921, Idee und Gestalt. Ein Führer zum Wesen der Kunst, Delphin-Verlag, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, M.: 1968, The Demands of Art, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, M.: 1945, Prehistoric Cave Paintings, Pantheon Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, M.: 1974, Theorie des geistigen Schaffens auf marxistischer Grundlage, S. Fischer, Frankfurt/M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, M.: 1975, Arbeiter, Kunst und Künstler. Beiträge zu einer marxistischen Kunstwissenschaft, S. Fischer, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz, J. R.: 1971, Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, W.: 1973, Character Analysis, Vision Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, W.: 1972, Sex-Pol. Essays 1929–1934, L. Baxandall (ed.), Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1979, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1989, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, P. W.: 1992, Sons of the Gods, Children of Earth. Ideology and Literary Form in Ancient Greece, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S.: 1992, Review of Schwartz (1992), Midgley (1992), Wolpert (1992), Times Literary Supplement, December 4.

  • Ruby, J. E.: 1986, ‘The Origins of Scientific “Law”’, Journal of the History of Ideas 47, 341–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1916, Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1948, Human Knowledge. Its Scope and Limits, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1949, The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1950, ‘“If”, “So” and “Because”’, in M. Black (ed.), Essays in Philosophical Analysis, Cornell University Press, Itahaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.: 1954, Dilemmas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, F.: 1967, On the Aesthetic Education of Man (Tr. E. M. Wilkinson and L. A. Willoughby), Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M.: 1959, ‘Truisms as the Grounds for Historical Explanations’, in P. Gardiner (ed.), Theories of History, Free Press, New York, 443–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley, J. and Hoeniger, D. (eds.): 1985, Science and the Arts in the Renaissance, Folger Books, Washington, D. C..

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleiermacher, F.: 1958 On Religion. Speeches to Its Cultured Despisers, Harper, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, M.: 1974, General Theory of Knowledge, Springer, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, M.: 1979, Philosophical Papers, 2 vols, D. Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlick, M.: 1987, The Problems of Philosophy in Their Interconnection, D. Reidel, Dordrecht/Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J.: 1992, The Creative Moment. How Science Made Itself Alien to Modern Culture, Jonathan Cape, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G.: 1985, Rembrandt. Eine kunstphilosophischer Versuch (1916), Matthes & Seitz, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1989, Our Place in the Universe. A Metaphysical Discussion, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, M.: 1988, Beethoven Essays, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass..

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, T.: 1991, Scientism: Philosophy and the Infatuation with Science, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, O.: 1926–1928, The Decline of the West, 2 vols, Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, O.: 1932, Man and Technics. A Contribution to a Philosophy of Life, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprinker, M.: 1987, Imaginary Relations. Aesthetics and Ideology in the Theory of Historical Materialism, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachel, J.: 1974, ‘A Note on the Concept of Scientific Practice’, R. S. Cohen et al. (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 15, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 417–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbing, L. S.:1937, Philosophy and the Physicists, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, G.: 1992, After Babel. Aspects of Language and Translation (2nd ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, I. F.: 1988, The Trial of Socrates, Little Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stove, D.:1991, The Cult of Plato and Other Philosophical Follies, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, E. W.: 1936, Procedures and Metaphysics. A Study in the Philosophy of Mathematical-Physical Science in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W.: 1975, ‘Marx on the Dialectics of Production and Consumption in the Introduction to the Grundrisse’, Social Praxis 3, 291–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W.: 1983, Marx. An Introduction, Wheatsheaf Books, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W.: 1986, Marx and Philosophy. Three Studies, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W.: 1991, ‘On Some Unsettled Questions Touching the Character of Marxism, especially as Philosophy’, Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal, New School for Social Research, 14(1), 139–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W.: 1992, ‘Reflections on Roy Bhaskar's “Critical Realism”’, Radical Philosophy 61.

  • Taylor, C.: 1989, Sources of the Self. The Making of the Modern Identity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetens, H.: 1987, Experimentelle Erfahrung. Eine wissenschaftstheoretische Studie über die Rolle des Experiments in der Begriffs- und Theorie-Bildung der Physik, F. Meiner, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theiler, W.: 1965, Zur Geschichte der teleologischer Naturbetrachtung bis auf Aristoteles (2nd ed.), W. de Gruyter, Berlin and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G.: 1946, Aeschylus and Athens. A Study in the Social Origins of Drama (2nd ed.), Lawrence and Wishart, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, G.:1955, The First Philosophers, Lawrence and Wishart, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiles, M.: 1984, Bachelard: Science and Objectivity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E.: 1953, Philosophy of Science. An Introduction, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E.: 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E.: 1959, ‘Criticism in the History of Science: Newton on Absolute Space, Time, and Motion’, Philosophical Review 68, 1–29, 203–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E.: 1961, Foresight and Understanding. An Enquiry into the Aims of Science, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E.: 1972, Human Understanding, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vološinov, V. N. 1973, Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, Seminar Press, New York & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vološinov, V. N.: 1987, Freudianism. A Critical Sketch, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S.: 1962, Thought and Language, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass..

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S.: The Psychology of Art, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass..

  • Wagner, R.: 1893, Opera and Drama, Vol. II of Prose Works (tr. W. A. Ellis), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, W. H.: 1938, On Understanding Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M.: 1947, The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L., Jr.: 1946, ‘Natural Science and Naturalistic Art in the Middle Ages’, American Historical Review 52, 421–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, W.: 1970, Die Aristotelische Physik (2nd ed.), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Gottingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Will, F. L.: 1988, Beyond Deductivism. Ampliative Aspects of Philosophical Reflection, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R.: 1983, Keywords. A Vocabulary of Culture and Society, Fontana, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winspear, A. D.: 1974, The Genesis of Plato's Thought (3rd ed.), Harvest House, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1967, Zettel, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1969, On Certainty, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1974, Philosophical Grammar, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1977, Vermischte Bemerkungen, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1978, Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics G. H. von Wright, R. Rhees, G. E. M. Anscombe (eds.) (2nd ed.), Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1986, Conversations 1945–1951 (with O. K. Bouwsma), Hackett Publ. Co., Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, L.: 1992, The Unnatural Nature of Science, Faber, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. M. and Wood N.: 1978, Class Ideology and Ancient Political Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilsel, E.: 1942, ‘The Genesis of the Concept of Physical Law’, Philosophical Review 51, 245–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilsel, E.: 1942a, ‘The Sociological Roots of Science’ American Journal of Sociology 47, 544–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilsel, E.: 1976, Die sozialen Ursprünge der neuzeitlichen Wissenschaft, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M..

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J.: 1978, Reliable Knowledge. An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The word ‘Notes’ here is meant to indicate, not that the paper presents only more or less random reflections, but rather that it is very condensed, and also that, though it is meant to be basically self-contained, the footnotes are more than usually important. The compression is the result both of a desire to set out a fairly complex argument in such a way that it can be surveyed as far as possible in a single sweep, and, also within the scope of that intent, of restrictions of space. I have supplemented the basic presentation with notes that give further indications on certain points and direct attention (in a necessarily extremely selective way) to relevant literature that, among other things, contains developments that cannot be pursued here.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suchting, W.A. Notes on the cultural significance of the sciences. Sci Educ 3, 1–56 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540222

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540222

Keywords

Navigation