Skip to main content
Log in

Science partnerships under the microscope: A study of Teacher Education Partnerships at Macquarie University

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Partnerships between schools and teacher education institutions are now widely promoted as an effective pathway to the preparation of pre-service students. This paper examines the ways in which one form of school/tertiary partnership has attempted, over a 25 year period, to respond to the key questions on partnership: How do university lecturers share teacher education with their colleagues in schools? When and where does this occur? What can tertiary staff learn from the “new” teacher educators? What strategies are being considered to enhance the spirit of mutual respect which must underpin successful teamwork? How well are the vital roles of adviser, counsellor, guide, support and teacher understood and shared by school and tertiary staff as they work with pre-service students? Do the partners share similar understandings of the theory and practice of the program? The authors conclude, as a result of their own experiences in the Teacher Education Program at Macquarie University in Sydney, and as a result of recent research into the formation of specific links between school teachers and tertiary lecturers, that the success of new experiments with partnership will depend, ultimately, upon the success of the human rather than the structural relationships established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J. (1992, February).A quantitative analysis of student teacher supervision models: Implications for the role of university supervisors. Research report presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Orlando, Florida.

  • Barber, M. (1993). The truth about partnership.Journal of Education for Teaching, 19(3), 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C., Jones, B., & Maude, P. (1994). Insights from the teaching profession: Potential advantages and disadvantages of greater school involvement in ITE.Cambridge Journal of Education, 24(1), 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Teacher Registration, Queensland. (1994).Learning to teach (Report of the Working Party on the Practicum in Pre-service Teacher Education). Brisbane: Board of Teacher Registration, Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, M., Furlong, J., & Wilkin, M. (1990).Partnership in initial teacher training. London: Cassell

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, L., & Eltis, K. (1982). The practicum: Views of students and teachers associated with two universities.Australian Journal of Teaching Practice, 3(1), 49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, L., Southcott, J., Hardy, C., Osborn, M., & Clingan, R. (1995, July).Reflections on: The Monash primary school-based teacher education programme 1995. Paper presented at a symposium at the annual conference of the Australian Teacher Education Association, Sydney, Australia.

  • Cotton, E., & Fischer, C. (1993, February).School and university partners in education: The selection and preparation of effective cooperating teachers. Paper presented at the national conference of the Association of Teacher Educators, Orlando, Florida.

  • Dart, L. (1993). School-based teacher training: A conservative practice?Journal of Education for Teaching, 19(2), 175–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Employment, Education and Training (DEET). (1989).Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVitis, J., & Simpson, D. (1993). John Goodlad's redesign of teacher education: Forging foundational connections.Educational Foundations, Spring, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, R. (1993, July).The practicum partnership: Implications for teacher education. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Teacher Educators Association, Fremantle, Australia.

  • Dunkley, M. (1970).The purpose of P-type courses. Paper written by the Director of the Teacher Education Program at Macquarie University for submission to the Senate Standing Committee on the Teacher Education Program.

  • Fraser, D. (1995, February).Pain and pleasure in partnership: The state of the partnership between, teachers, students and lecturers. Paper presented at the 2nd National Cross-Faculty Practicum Conference, Gold Coast, Australia.

  • Furlong, J. (1994). Another view from the crossroads.Cambridge Journal of Education, 24(1), 117–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, C. (1982).Guiding clinical experience in teacher education. New York, Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagger, H., Burn, K., & McIntyre, D. (1993).The school mentor handbook. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D., Freeman, L., Horton, C., & Rountree, B. (1993). Personal perspectives on a school-university partnership.Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(5/6), 499–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, S., Wiseman, D., & Smith, C. (1992). The reflective-activity dilemma in school-university partnerships.Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 262–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, J. G., Cole, A. L., & Presswood, C. S. (1994).Through preservice teachers' eyes. Exploring field experiences through narrative and inquiry. New York: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, A. (1994, July).Empowering teacher educators: A process of transition. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Teacher Education Association, Brisbane, Australia.

  • Kroll, L., Rutherford, M., Bowyer, J., & Hauben, M. (1990, April).The effect of a school university partnership on the student teaching experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston U.S.A.

  • Lasley, T., & Matczynski, T. (1992). Collaborative and noncollaborative partnership structures in teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 257–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D. (1991). The Oxford University model of teacher education.South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 19(2), 117–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D., Hagger, H., & Wilkin, M. (1993).Mentoring: Perspectives on school-based teacher education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, P. (1993, June).Partnership in teacher education: The professional fourth year (internship) at James Cook University. Paper presented at the Initial Teacher Training Through Partnership Conference, London, England.

  • McWilliam, E., & O'Brien, P. (1993). Towards teaching in partnership: Lessons still to be learned.South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 21(1), 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, S., Everton, T., & Bonnett, M. (1994). Primary partnership matters: Some views from the profession.Cambridge Journal of Education, 24(1), 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macquarie University Teacher Education Program. (1975).School experience guide. Sydney: Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, J., & Merseth, K. (1992). Collaborating teachers in a professional development school: Inducements and contributions.Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 308–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedley, L. (1993).Partnerships at Macquarie: A study of twenty-five years of partnership between school- and university-based teacher educators in the Macquarie University Teacher Education Program. Unpublished doctoral research, Macquarie University, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedley, L. (1994). Preparing the future language teacher: A tribute tocco-operating classroom teachers.Babel, 29(1), 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smedley, L., O'Brien, D., Trent, L., & Warton, P. (1995). Breaking with tradition: Documented change in patterns of supervision of final year pre-service teachers at Macquarie University.The Journal of Teaching Practice, 14(2), 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (1992). Professional partnerships and educational change: Effective collaboration over time.Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooy, W. (1993a). Teaching controversial issues in the secondary science classroom.Research in Science Education, 23, 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooy, W. (1993b). Excerpts from audio tape recorded as part of doctoral studies of L. Smedley, Macquarie University, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkin, M., & Sankey, D. (1994).Collaboration and transition in initial teacher education. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, P. (1986). Lessons for collaboration between educational agencies.Journal of Teacher Education, Sept–Oct, 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. (1993). Traditions of practice in U.S. preservice teacher education programs.Teacher & Teacher Education, 9(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lea Smedley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smedley, L., Van Rooy, W. Science partnerships under the microscope: A study of Teacher Education Partnerships at Macquarie University. Research in Science Education 26, 73–88 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356964

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356964

Keywords

Navigation