Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender, pre-service teachers and assessment of pupil work

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Across Australia fewer females choose to study the physical sciences and their achievements are lower than for males. Many reasons have been put forward for this. Elsewhere science teachers have been found to hold gender-stereotyped expectations of their pupils and to assess pupil capabilities differently according to the gender of the pupil. The gender of the teacher has also been found to affect the assessments made. This study investigated whether pre-service teachers would assess pupil capability across a range of work samples and potential in science differently according to the gender of the pupil or the gender of the pre-service teacher. No statistically significant differences were found for the assessments made. Weak trends in the data along gender-stereotypic lines were found which have implications for teacher training courses. Correlational findings also revealed worrying trends relating forms of assessment with assessment of pupil capability and potential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, C. (1985). Teacher attitudes towards issues of sex equality. In J. Whyte, R. Deem, L. Kant, & M. Cruikshank, (Eds.).Girl friendly schooling (pp.119–129), London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. M. & Price, R. A. (1982). Correlates and predictors of women's mathematics participation.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.13, 99–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Education Council (1985).Education for girls. Melbourne: Australian Education Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Science Teachers Association (1987).Policy: Girls and women in science education. Australian Science Teachers Association.

  • Bradley, C. (1984). Sex bias in the evaluation of students.British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 147–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. A., & Massey, D. (1989). Perpetuating gender inequity: Attitudes of teacher education students.Australian Journal of Education, 33(3), 256–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth Schools Commission (1984).Girls and tomorrow: The challenge for schools (Report of the Commonwealth Schools Commission's Working Party on the Education of Girls). Canberra.

  • Commonwealth Schools Commission (1986).A national policy for the education of girls in Australian schools (interim report of the Commonwealth Schools Commission). Canberra.

  • Crossman, M. (1987). Teachers' interactions with girls and boys in science lessons. In A. Kelly (Ed.),Science for girls? (pp. 58–65). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Laeter, J. R., Malone, J., & Dekkers, J. (1989). Female science enrolment trends in Australian senior secondary schools.The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 35(3), 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Employment, Education and Training (DEET) (1989).Discipline review of teacher education in mathematics and science Canberra: DEET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T. D. (1979). Creativity, sex role socialisation and pupil-teacher interactions in early schooling.Sociological Review,27(1).

  • Evans, T. D. (1982). Being and becoming: teachers' perceptions of sex-roles and actions toward their male and female pupils.British Journal of Sociology of Education, 3(2), 127–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E. & Sherman, J. A. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors.American Educational Research Journal, 9, 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1978). Mathematics achievement and related factors: a further study.Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 9, 189–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P., & West, L. (1990). The quality of teacher education programs: Methodological and procedural issues for reviewers.Research in Science Education, 20, 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. (1983).Switched off: The science education of girls. York, England: Longman for Schools Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, R. (1984). The maleness of science.The Australian Science Teachers Journal, 30, (1), 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. G. (1989). Gender issues in teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education, 40, 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. G., & Wheatley, J. (1988). Factors influencing the entry of women into science and related fields.Science Education, 72(2), 127–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. G., & Wheatley, J. (1989). Gender influences in classroom displays and student-teacher behaviors,Science Education, 73(5), 535–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, J. (1988). Gender and science education II. In P. Fensham (Ed.),Development and dilemmas in science education. (pp.249–265). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A. (1987). The construction of masculine science. In A. Kelly (Ed.),Science for girls? (pp.66–77). Milton-Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, G. C. (1982). Mathematics achievement and fear of success.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 124–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, G. C. (1985). Sex-related differences in mathematics: An overview. In E. Fennema (Ed.), Explaining sex-related differences in mathematics: Theoretical models.Educational Studies in Mathematics,16(3), 304–309.

  • Leder, G. C., (1988). Teacher-student interactions: The mathematics classroom.Unicorn, 14(3), 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. & Davies, A. (1988).GAMAST (Girls and Maths and Science Teaching project): Gender equity in mathematics & science. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock Collective (1988).Getting into gear: Gender inclusive teaching strategies in science. Canberra: Curriculum Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education (Schools Division), Victoria (1988).The science framework: P-10: Science for every student. Victoria: Ministry of Education (Schools Division).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. A., & Johnson, D. R. (1983). A reexamination of elementary school teacher expectations: Evidence of sex and ethnic segmentation.Social Science Quarterly, 64(3), 460–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. J. L. (1978). Sex differences in examination performance: Do these reflect differences in ability or sex-role stereotypes?Educational Review, 30(3), 259–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open University (1986).Girls into mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. H., & Offer, J. A. (1987). Girls, boys and lower secondary school achievement: The shifting scence 1972–1986.Unicorn, 13(3), 148–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedro, J., Wolleat, P., Fennema, E., & Becker, A. (1981). Election of high school mathematics by females and males: Attributions and attitudes.American Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, J. (1985). The attitudes of teachers. In J. Whyte, R. Deem, L. Kant, & M. Cruikshank, (Eds.).Girl friendly schooling (pp.24–35), London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., & Punch, K. F. (1984). Attitudes and achievement in science: A relationship clarified.Australian Association for Research in Education, National Conference, Perth, 726–735.

  • Shanks, G. (1981).Science and the road — the vehicle. Road Safety and Traffic Authority (ROSTA) in conjunction with the Education Department of Victoria.

  • Spear, M. G. (1984). Sex bias in science teachers' ratings of work and pupil characteristics.European Journal of Science Education, 6(4), 369–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, M. G. (1985). Teachers' attitudes towards girls and technology. In J. Whyte, R. Deem, L. Kant & M. Cruikshank (Eds.),Girl friendly schooling London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spear, M. G. (1987). Teachers' views about the importance of science to boys and girls. In A. Kelly, (Ed.),Science for girls? (pp.52–57). Milton-Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, D. (1980). Talking in class. In D. Spender & E. Sarah (Eds.),Learning to lose: Sexism and education (pp.148–154). London: The Women's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Board (VCAB) (1988).Report of Examiners, Physics. VCAB.

  • Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Board (VCAB) (1989).Report of Examiners, Physics. VCAB.

  • Wolleat, P., Pedro, J., Becker, A., & Fennema, E. (1980). Sex differences in high school students' causal attributions of performance in mathematics.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11(5), 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Helen J. Forgasz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Ms Helen Forgasz, Research assistant and Ph.D. studen, Faculty of Education, Monash University, 3168.Specializations: science, physics and mathematics education, gender issues.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forgasz, H.J. Gender, pre-service teachers and assessment of pupil work. Research in Science Education 21, 113–122 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02360464

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02360464

Keywords

Search

Navigation