Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating faculty performance under the equal pay for equal work doctrine

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The issue of sex discrimination in faculty employment has become a prominent legal and political concern, necessitating the development of objective empirical methods to determine the existence of patterns of discriminatory treatment. In this study, regression techniques are employed to apply the equal pay for equal work interpretation of the fair employment doctrine. Specifically, faculty promotion and salary policies at the University of Texas at Austin are analyzed to determine whether male and female faculty members are rewarded equally for equal academic qualifications and performances. This regression analysis tends to support the discrimination hypothesis with respect to both promotion and salary policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blackstone, T., and Fulton, O. (1975). Sex discrimination among university teachers: a British-American comparison. British Journal of Sociology 26:261–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. (1973). Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources 8:436–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. (1972). “The Status of Women in Higher Education.” New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, M., and Loeb, J. (1973). Performance, rewards, and perceptions of sex discrimination among male and female faculty. American Journal of Sociology 78:997–1002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (1970). The second sex in academe. AAUP Bulletin 56:283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeb, J., and Ferber, M. (1971). “Sex as predictive of salary and status on a university faculty.” Journal of Educational Measurement 8:235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics. (1975). Salaries and tenure of full-time instructional faculty, 1974–75. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Civil Rights (1972). Higher education guidelines: executive order 11246. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, B. (1973). Uncle Sam wants you to help women: ending sex discrimination on the campus. Delivered at the annual meeting of the National Association of College and University Business Officers.

  • Simon, R., and Rosenthal. (1967). Profile of the women Ph.D. in economics, history, and sociology. AAUW Journal 60:127–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buzan, B.C., Hunt, T.L. Evaluating faculty performance under the equal pay for equal work doctrine. Res High Educ 5, 113–123 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992006

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992006

Key words

Navigation