Abstract
A controversial issue exists in questionnaire survey techniques as to the relationship between questionnaire length and rate of returns. Questionnaire return rates were, therefore, examined under the following six controlled methodological conditions: (1) a large random sample, 1,650; (2) no follow-up procedures; (3) same type of mailout procedures and instructions for each questionnaire length; (4) no incentives or high interest factors; (5) same type of questionnaire for each of the three questionnaire lengths; (6) questionnaires of appropriate lengths (1, 3, and 5 pages); and (7) a daily tally of returns kept for each type of questionnaire. There was a difference in the rate of return among the three types of questionnaires when other influences on rate of return were held to a minimum. The variant results between the study and previous studies referred to in the review of literature can be explained by the fact that the controlled conditions were maintained for this study and not for previous studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachrack, S. D., and Scoble, H. M. Mail questionnaire efficiency: controlled reduction of nonresponse.Public Opinion Quarterly 1967,31 265–271.
Berdie, D. R., and Anderson, J. F.Questionnaires: Design and use. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1974.
Berdie, D. R. Questionnaire length and response rate.Journal of Applied Psychology 1973,58 278–280.
Carpenter, E. H. Personalizing mail surveys: a replication and reassessment.Public Opinion Quarterly 1975,38 614–620.
Champion, D. J., and Sear, A. M. Questionnaire response rate: a methodological analysis.Social Forces 1969,47 335–339.
Dillman, D. A., Christenson, J. A., Carpenter, E. H., and Brooks, R. M. Increasing mail questionnaire response: a four state comparison.American Sociological Review October 1974,39 744–756.
Etzel, M. J., and Walker, B. J. Effects of alternative follow-up procedures on mail survey response rates.Journal of Applied Psychology 1974,59 219–221.
Ford, N. M. The advance letter in mail surveys.Journal of Marketing Research 1967,4 202–204.
Godwin, R. K. The consequences of large monetary incentives in mail surveys of elites.Public Opinion Quarterly 1979,43 378–387.
Goldstein, H., and Kroll, B. H. Methods of increasing mail response.Journal of Marketing 1957,22 55–57.
Goode, W. J., and Hatt, P. K.Methods in Social Research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952.
Heaton, E. E., Jr. Increasing mail questionnaire returns with a preliminary letter.Journal of Advertising Research 1965,5 36–39.
Heberlein, T. A., and Baumgartner, R. Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: a quantitative analysis of the published literature.American Sociological Review 1978,43 447–462.
Hensley, W. E. Increasing response rate by choice of postage stamps.Public Opinion Quarterly 1974,38 280–283.
Hesseldenz, J. S., and Smith, B. G. Computer-prepared questionnaires and grouping theories: considerations for mail surveys in academic settings.Research in Higher Education 1977,6 85–94.
Hesseldenz, J. S. Determining validity and identifying nonresponse bias in a survey requesting income data.Research in Higher Education 1976,5 179–191.
House, J. S., Gerber, W., and McMichael, A. J. Increasing mail questionnaire response: a controlled replication and extension.Public Opinion Quarterly 1977,41 95–99.
Jones, W. H. Generalizing mail survey inducement methods: population interactions with anonymity and sponsorship.Public Opinion Quarterly 1979,43 102–111.
Kerlinger, F. N.Foundations of Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.
Leslie, L. L. Increasing response rates to long questionnaires.Journal of Educational Research 1970,63 347–350.
Linsky, A. S. A factorial experiment in inducing responses to a mail questionnaire.Sociology and Social Research 1965,49 183–189.
Norton, J. K. The questionnaire problem from the viewpoint of the superintendent of schools.NEA Research Bulletin 1930,8(1), 34.
Pucel, D. J., Nelson, H. F., and Wheeler, D. N. Questionnaire follow-up returns as a function of incentives and responder characteristics.Vocational Guidance Quarterly 1971,19 188–193.
Robinson, R. A., and Agisim, P. Making mail surveys more reliable.Journal of Marketing 1951,15 415–424.
Selltiz, C., Jahoda, M., Deutsch, M., and Cook, S. W.Research Methods in Social Relations. New York: Henry Holt, 1959.
Sletto, R. F. Pretesting of questionnaires.American Sociological Review 1940,5 195–196.
Veiga, J. F. Getting the mail questionnaire returned: some practical research considerations.Journal of Applied Psychology 1974,59 217–218.
Wotruba, T. R. Monetary inducements and mail questionnaire response.Journal of Marketing Research 1966,3 398–400.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adams, L.L.M., Gale, D. Solving the quandary between questionnaire length and response rate in educational research. Res High Educ 17, 231–240 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976700
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976700