Skip to main content
Log in

Solving the quandary between questionnaire length and response rate in educational research

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A controversial issue exists in questionnaire survey techniques as to the relationship between questionnaire length and rate of returns. Questionnaire return rates were, therefore, examined under the following six controlled methodological conditions: (1) a large random sample, 1,650; (2) no follow-up procedures; (3) same type of mailout procedures and instructions for each questionnaire length; (4) no incentives or high interest factors; (5) same type of questionnaire for each of the three questionnaire lengths; (6) questionnaires of appropriate lengths (1, 3, and 5 pages); and (7) a daily tally of returns kept for each type of questionnaire. There was a difference in the rate of return among the three types of questionnaires when other influences on rate of return were held to a minimum. The variant results between the study and previous studies referred to in the review of literature can be explained by the fact that the controlled conditions were maintained for this study and not for previous studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachrack, S. D., and Scoble, H. M. Mail questionnaire efficiency: controlled reduction of nonresponse.Public Opinion Quarterly 1967,31 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdie, D. R., and Anderson, J. F.Questionnaires: Design and use. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdie, D. R. Questionnaire length and response rate.Journal of Applied Psychology 1973,58 278–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, E. H. Personalizing mail surveys: a replication and reassessment.Public Opinion Quarterly 1975,38 614–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion, D. J., and Sear, A. M. Questionnaire response rate: a methodological analysis.Social Forces 1969,47 335–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A., Christenson, J. A., Carpenter, E. H., and Brooks, R. M. Increasing mail questionnaire response: a four state comparison.American Sociological Review October 1974,39 744–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzel, M. J., and Walker, B. J. Effects of alternative follow-up procedures on mail survey response rates.Journal of Applied Psychology 1974,59 219–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, N. M. The advance letter in mail surveys.Journal of Marketing Research 1967,4 202–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, R. K. The consequences of large monetary incentives in mail surveys of elites.Public Opinion Quarterly 1979,43 378–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H., and Kroll, B. H. Methods of increasing mail response.Journal of Marketing 1957,22 55–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, W. J., and Hatt, P. K.Methods in Social Research. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, E. E., Jr. Increasing mail questionnaire returns with a preliminary letter.Journal of Advertising Research 1965,5 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein, T. A., and Baumgartner, R. Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: a quantitative analysis of the published literature.American Sociological Review 1978,43 447–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensley, W. E. Increasing response rate by choice of postage stamps.Public Opinion Quarterly 1974,38 280–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesseldenz, J. S., and Smith, B. G. Computer-prepared questionnaires and grouping theories: considerations for mail surveys in academic settings.Research in Higher Education 1977,6 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesseldenz, J. S. Determining validity and identifying nonresponse bias in a survey requesting income data.Research in Higher Education 1976,5 179–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, J. S., Gerber, W., and McMichael, A. J. Increasing mail questionnaire response: a controlled replication and extension.Public Opinion Quarterly 1977,41 95–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. H. Generalizing mail survey inducement methods: population interactions with anonymity and sponsorship.Public Opinion Quarterly 1979,43 102–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N.Foundations of Behavioral Research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, L. L. Increasing response rates to long questionnaires.Journal of Educational Research 1970,63 347–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsky, A. S. A factorial experiment in inducing responses to a mail questionnaire.Sociology and Social Research 1965,49 183–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J. K. The questionnaire problem from the viewpoint of the superintendent of schools.NEA Research Bulletin 1930,8(1), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pucel, D. J., Nelson, H. F., and Wheeler, D. N. Questionnaire follow-up returns as a function of incentives and responder characteristics.Vocational Guidance Quarterly 1971,19 188–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. A., and Agisim, P. Making mail surveys more reliable.Journal of Marketing 1951,15 415–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selltiz, C., Jahoda, M., Deutsch, M., and Cook, S. W.Research Methods in Social Relations. New York: Henry Holt, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sletto, R. F. Pretesting of questionnaires.American Sociological Review 1940,5 195–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veiga, J. F. Getting the mail questionnaire returned: some practical research considerations.Journal of Applied Psychology 1974,59 217–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wotruba, T. R. Monetary inducements and mail questionnaire response.Journal of Marketing Research 1966,3 398–400.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Adams, L.L.M., Gale, D. Solving the quandary between questionnaire length and response rate in educational research. Res High Educ 17, 231–240 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976700

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00976700

Keywords

Navigation