Skip to main content
Log in

Voter information and power dilution: Evidence from Sicilian provincial elections

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is generally accepted that an increase in the amount of voter information is desirable. As Reisman (1990) points out, a well-informed and committed electorate is better able to exercise rational choice and consequently is less likely to have its wishes being thwarted by elected representatives. In this connection, a crucial question relates to the effect of increased voter information on power of elected representatives. In other words, does increased voter information dilute or increase the power of political parties? From the answer to this question flow numerous conclusions about the size of rents enjoyed by political parties under differing electoral systems.

We use data from Sicilian provincial elections (1985 and 1990) to examine the empirical relationship between voter information and power dilution. We use Olson's theory of groups to derive measures of voter information, following a methodology developed in Mudambi, Navarra, and Nicosia (1996). We use a measure of power dilution proposed by Capron and Kruseman (1988) and suggest an adjustment to correct it for truncation bias. We then examine the relationship between voter information and power dilution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achen, C.H. (1975). Mass political attitudes and the survey response. American Political Science Review 69: 1218–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1985). Advanced econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzel, Y. and Silberg, G. (1973). Is the act of voting rational? Public Choice 16: 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. and Pagan, A. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica 47: 1287–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. and Pagan, A. (1980). The LM test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Review of Economic Studies 47: 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosio, G. and Ferrero, M. (1995). Un'interpretazione della Politica Italiana: Un Regime di' Nomenklarura' in un Sistema Democratico. Economia Pubblica 2: 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capron, H. and Kruseman, J.L. (1988). Is political rivalry an incentive to vote? Public Choice 56: 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, G.W. and Munger, M.C. (1989). Closeness, expenditures and turnout in the 1982 U.S. House elections. American Political Science Review 83: 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R.S. (1979). The SRC panel data and mass political attitudes. British Journal of Political Science 9: 89–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (1971). Why do high income people participate more in politics? Public Choice 11: 101–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (1972). Political participation and income level: Reply. Public Choice 13: 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. (1993). Econometric analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J.E. (1992). The revelation of information through the electoral process: An explanatory analysis. Economics and Politics 4: 255–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, T.A., Kenny, L.W. and Morton, R.C. (1995). Constituent errors in assessing their senators. Public Choice 83(3–4): 251–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G.C. (1978). The effects of electoral campaign spending in congressional elections. American Political Science Review 72: 469–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R., Navarra, P. and Nicosia, C. (1996). Plurality versus proportional representation: An analysis of Sicilian elections. Public Choice 86(3–4): 341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarra, P. (1994). Competizione Politica e Gruppi di Interesse: Contratti Idiosincratici e Regole Elettorali tra gli Agenti del Mercato Politico. In G. Sobbrio (Ed.), Modelli Organizzativi e Intervento Pubblico, 213–225. Milano: Giuffre'.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, T. and Poole, K. (1987). The relationship between information, ideology and voting behavior. American Journal of Political Science 31: 511–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, S.C. and Caldeira, G.A. (1983). Getting out the vote: Participation in gubernatorial elections. American Political Science Review 77: 675–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regione Siciliana (1987). =Elezioni dei Consigli delle Amministrazioni Straordinarie delle Province dei Consigli Comunali e dei Consigli di Quartiere nella Regione Siciliana - 12 Maggio 1985. Palermo: Assessorato Enti Locali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regione Siciliana (1992). =Elezioni dei Consigli delle Province Regionali, dei Consigli Comunali e dei Consigli di Quartiere nella Regione Siciliana dal 26 Maggio 1985 al 2 Dicembre 1990. Palermo: Assessorato Enti Locali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisman, D. (1990). Theories of collective actions: Downs, Olson and Hirsh. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, R., Crain, M. and Pautler, P. (1975). Information and voting: An empirical note. Public Choice 24: 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mudambi, R., Navarra, P., Navarra, P. et al. Voter information and power dilution: Evidence from Sicilian provincial elections. Public Choice 92, 169–180 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004970720735

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004970720735

Keywords

Navigation